Latest posts of: Btceon

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: September 02, 2019, 08:05:58 AM

Hello to all! For fast transaction processing and security, which of the two protocols is better? CryptoNote or Scrypt? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CryptoNote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrypt

on: August 01, 2019, 12:52:45 PM

Proper generated private key wil be in the 254,255,256 bits range, wih a random search it will be not feasible. So to search within a specific range will be more succesfull. I do respect my friend scorta...but you also need to have a look a this repo...https://github.com/pikachunakapika/BitCrack this repo is a fork of this repo https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack...the difference with the Picachu fork in comparisson to the original is the added flag -r (random)...so that means you can search within a specific keyrange, with applying flag --keyspace with also a random mode...this means bigger change for succes (read also the original repo of BRichard, all flags what you will see there are also applicable with the Picachu fork...so only added the -r flag (random). Also a big advantage of this repo's will be, they run on GPU...their is a version for CUDA (Nvidia) and OCL (AMD, Intel) depending on your GPU you will get a speed between 1 and 250 Mkeys...the app of scorta runs on CPU and will have a speed between 5 and 10 k pro CPU core...so that's a huge difference here...

on: June 10, 2019, 11:54:11 AM

How to check the balance of the list of 1 million Bitcoin Addresses? Is there such a program?

on: May 30, 2019, 09:42:13 AM

Hello!!! Please explain why earlier the repeated values of "R" occurred in Bitcoin translations. For example, this transaction has a repetition of the value "R": https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/19d66411a5aa716a04b37197c11c93c9446a54694a2d2302093d8b0a93ed5d83 If you look at RawTX: https://btc.com/19d66411a5aa716a04b37197c11c93c9446a54694a2d2302093d8b0a93ed5d83.rawhex repeat value "R": R = cabc3692f1f7ba75a8572dc5d270b35bcc00650534f6e5ecd6338e55355454d5 What was the reason for this? Explain the reason for this error?

on: May 30, 2019, 09:09:38 AM

Please advise me! I have a list of 15 million compressed public keys, as well as Bitcoin Address. Using "Vanitygen" is it possible to find at least one private key from any public key from the list from the large list of compressed public keys secp256k1? Public keys: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HByDJR9Ck5CdIwTl-v_IzcaVhsG8aKaA Bitcoin Address: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KFTPpH8fmw_44Ns0F3mEOFXXjzOQecVG EMAIL: rozwrcd@gmail.com

on: May 30, 2019, 08:20:46 AM

Is it possible to find at least one private key from any public key from the list from the large list of compressed public keys secp256k1? Public keys: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HByDJR9Ck5CdIwTl-v_IzcaVhsG8aKaA As I know, this list contains 15 million compressed public keys. Is it possible to use any method for such a large list of compressed public keys in order to finally find at least one private key?

on: May 27, 2019, 12:54:13 PM

Tell me please, I heard that on this forum or GitHub there is a large list of found Bitcoin private keys where BTC transactions have ever been. (with Balance: 0 BTC) Please share this information.

on: May 27, 2019, 11:27:38 AM

Greetings to all friends! Tell me please, I heard that on this forum or GitHub there is a large list of found Bitcoin private keys where BTC transactions have ever been. (with Balance: 0 BTC) Please share this information.

on: April 24, 2019, 11:39:40 AM

Quote from: Ambirus on April 24, 2019, 07:11:13 AM Quote from: Btceon on April 23, 2019, 12:06:09 PM I managed to decrypt the public keys for each Bitcoin Address from the list. Public keys: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HByDJR9Ck5CdIwTl-v_IzcaVhsG8aKaA Now I will try to extract a few private keys through the "Baby-step Giant-step" method. What software do you use the Baby-step Giant-step method? The baby-step giant-step method works by using a hash table to trade space for time. It's particularly easy to implement since python has hash tables nicely built in as dictionaries. >>> crack_baby_giant(C, P, n, Q) Priv key: d = 692847 Time: 0.356 secs https://github.com/qubd/mini_ecdsa

on: April 23, 2019, 12:06:09 PM

I managed to decrypt the public keys for each Bitcoin Address from the list. Public keys: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HByDJR9Ck5CdIwTl-v_IzcaVhsG8aKaA Now I will try to extract a few private keys through the "Baby-step Giant-step" method.

on: April 23, 2019, 11:41:28 AM

Quote from: 33bitcoin on April 22, 2019, 12:59:37 PM Quote from: MCXI on November 07, 2018, 08:08:04 AM Quantum computation is irrelevent to the common internet of things we all use, they work on different metrics... 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007913129639936 to 1 is quantums challenge and thats per private key, and per to the X degree of years it would mathematically take for 1 correct vector of a single private key... and all of this is done on hypothetical qubit math and integrated towards an incompatible SHA-256 metric... .:.fear is learning untried.:. Quantum computing may never come to be a reality, its still just an unproven theory. Bitcoin can't be cracked, it is impossible for any address to be brute forced unless there was a flaw in the key generation. The one who found the vulnerability in secp256k1 will never share with you in this forum. Just you quote the words of those that it is not possible! But experts in the field of cryptography have a different opinion.

Pages: [1]