Price is falling because there is very low diff for miners. Miners dumping all coins. Maybe dev could think about not to limit pool to 25mh/s and release the source for other pools. it should help to pump the price on exchanges in long run. Anyway there is pool which is not limited by mh/s per user. I know there was idea to allow cpu/gpu miners to be profitable but I think It's not possible on scrypt algos anymore, maybe only to change algo, if dev wan't to go gpu's way... In this situation the price will be 20- sat soon and people were byuing this for 100+ sats. But anyway, nice coin... Good luck
|
|
|
how much coins needed to start masternode?
|
|
|
Yes, you was right
|
|
|
network stuck at block 32,681?
No, just not enough the hash power strange, because there was no reason to jump in difficulty,hashrate was same as at lower diff... Network hashrate seens to be 1.97gh.... I noticed that this statistic is not true. As soon as the hash power comes to suchpool then block chain starts to move. ok i will return to suchpool and will see...
|
|
|
network stuck at block 32,681?
No, just not enough the hash power strange, because there was no reason to jump in difficulty,hashrate was same as at lower diff... Network hashrate seens to be 1.97gh....
|
|
|
network stuck at block 32,681?
|
|
|
yes it's good price. But +shipping +taxes + PSU's Gold rated(2200w)... And if I remember correctly they had problems with stable hashrate, maybe it's fixed now idk.
|
|
|
I'm currently on block 216052.
Kimmyf had to change the server that the block explorer was on circa 5/9/2015. Perhaps that is why the block explorer is behind.
I will get in touch with kimmyf about it.
In other news, I spoke with a developer this week who is capable of building EventHub and willing to do it as a job, but he was very straightforward with me about his opinion that he doesn't think the concept is viable. Obviously, I'd prefer to work with and invest in a developer who does think the concept is viable and is interested in seeing it succeed, so for now, the search continues.
infinitechaos, thank You for update and for your work. Also i think I'm on right chain, finally on block 216150.
|
|
|
Somebody is staking on different chain, not the block explorer one. I was staking also on wrong chain,block count was over 210 000,block explorer is 207925, Resyncing now with nodes posted....
EDIT: I have completly resynced the wallet with posted nodes and I'm on block 128105 but block explorer's last block is 207925 from 5/9/2015 2:29:27 PM;
our block explorer does indeed seem to be stuck at block 207925 on 5/9/2015. I run two nodes that are currently on block 215962 and staking. I'm using the nodes listed in the OP and they both seem to be working but without the block explorer I can't verify that I'm not on a fork....... .....Houston, we may have a little issue .......... Thank You for reply, I will resync again.
|
|
|
Somebody is staking on different chain, not the block explorer one. I was staking also on wrong chain,block count was over 210 000,block explorer is 207925, Resyncing now with nodes posted....
EDIT: I have completly resynced the wallet with posted nodes and I'm on block 128105 but block explorer's last block is 207925 from 5/9/2015 2:29:27 PM;
|
|
|
Nothing major to share quite yet.
We have some ideas we are considering and contacts to whom we are reaching out.
StudioProject left us with absolutely zero tech that can sustain the intended functionality of this coin, so it is going to take some time to find the right people, funding, etc. to get us to where we want to go, but we are here doing our best!
any news?
|
|
|
slr back on track 3btc to 18k...nice
|
|
|
Is there any reason why Suprnova still says that we are on block 415? and Dev honestly how long is the block time for this coin? Because all I know is that was ridiculous that it took like 12 hours just to get off block 415
Last found block by suprnova is 415, current block 418, thats what suprnova is saying right now. Anyway block diff retargeting is not good, no reason to mine right now, I think...
|
|
|
Yup. Should I put the masternode configuration in the "masternode.conf" file as explained in a Dashtalk forum.
In your wallet you need exactly 25,000 Goats in single block 1. run wallet with masternode=0 in .conf -> generate your priv key 2. close wallet -> in conf file masternode=1 3. run wallet 4. start masternode
|
|
|
hopefully bittrex will not delist the coin....
|
|
|
Hello everyone, I've been pretty busy lately with non-crypto life but I did have a chance this week to make a proper pitch to the Blocknet, essentially proposing that they might consider taking over development of the EventToken project and integrate it with the Blocknet. If this proves to be a fruitful avenue to finding development resources that can manifest this application of blockchain technology to event ticketing and finances, I think EventToken could potentially serve to be one of the most viable resources available through the Blocknet, a cross-chain communication protocol/platform that is making some interesting moves in this space right now. You can follow the conversation re: this proposal at the Blocknet's Public Meeting ConceptBoard: https://conceptboard.com/board/df5k-3bu1-7hfa-i6uz-k865For more information on the Blocknet: http://blocknet.co/DonShoshan has also gratefully shared this information with the CCC - CryptoCurrency Collector Club - on Facebook. ~infinitechaos Great news, hope we will be back soon...
|
|
|
What's the current block number?
3628?
same....
|
|
|
longest does not automatically imply the correct one Smiley
diff is much higher on the the other chain, and we're also not alone here Yes I know I haven't problem with that. Just saying where I am (somewhere in forest trying to find friends)
|
|
|
{ "blocks" : 3003, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : { "proof-of-work" : 7.50529447, "proof-of-stake" : 1696.39477649, "search-interval" : 16 }, "blockvalue" : 1973167540, "netmhashps" : 805.87485770, "netstakeweight" : 2504185177500.73095703, "errors" : "", "pooledtx" : 0, "stakeweight" : { "minimum" : 0, "maximum" : 0, "combined" : 0 }, "testnet" : false }
heh, lets see where this finish
|
|
|
|