-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Max Mintages of 2017 Brass XMR coins:

150 coins - 2017 ONE XMR Brass w/ original XMR holograms
150 coins - 2017 ONE XMR Nickel-Plated Brass w/ original XMR holograms
150 coins - 2017 0.5 XMR Brass w/ slightly modified XMR holograms
150 coins - 2017 0.5 XMR Nickel-Plated Brass w/ slightly modified XMR holograms

ONE XMR coin diameter = 28.5 mm
0.5 XMR coin diameter = 26 mm

Both ONE XMR coin types will have the denomination laser marked on to the holograms.
0.5 XMR coins will not have this laser mark given the difference in size (smaller) and slight design changes in the hologram for distinction.

If a coin is sold unfunded then the hologram will be marked with the word "UNFUNDED".

All funded coins come with a digital certificate with similar format to previous funded XMR coins by LEALANA.

Smoothie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJcT3D/AAoJEJqyV7+nZNgzKN8H/120pspaHEXfh/pVGAO/rDqq
11Siddz+20PSP2hJm+yq38g5kMuCxmh9tBzLwR9cGr+h4nCGwk+jVcujyx9Cnkoz
7PujZEDhtjUJFdBqJEVgA16ZcgPmxqI1draaAw1lClTHCRVZ8VbTo+R27hZtC5nY
n/Z+Z3QGnELuaQQXl6c8/ZBLQVdu7PAR2wU1kJjnR7OKeqCxJd8IsQliOVcOmSQT
tkT0Om8cQP++Jbzx4AUH8/ZTVhLUO06iAA3YJ6fq7U0DqEsbNmRpNxKuHr+y8XDi
YrYI1t9wFKuZRE7WJhkh1r4OGvkp3YcgPaBIpX20qul4awR/ohcolBr3Zcnln7g=
=1tB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





pictures: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089359.msg48877043#msg48877043

These coins in general (2013 brass) were first sold after I stopped funding coins directly. This coin type was never funded by me, ever (to be clear). The purchaser of the coins funded them if the holograms are unmarked.

The brass BTC coins may be indeed funded, but not by me.

Anyone claiming that I funded a coin after early 2014 has misled you.

Hope this helps.

This "degradation" of the holograms for the first batch of 10 LTC coins (aka "error" coins) may have this issue. It is an issue that was unforeseen of course as no one had ever created bulgy physical crypto coins with holograms. The issue doesn't appear to manifest itself until months if not years later. Could be also related to alternating temperature increases and decreases that causes the hologram to degrade because of any trapped air under the hologram expanding and contracting (just a theory).

Some of my own coins in my possession have displayed this issue of degradation due to the gap the bulge induces on the hologram.

All of my other coins that have the recess in the metal have not displayed this type of degradation.

The specific area this is affected is only in the middle where the paper private key exists which causes the bulge. The outer areas have not in my knowledge had this issue even with these coins.

I've had one such customer ask me about this in the past.

If you are worried about coins being tampered with or not sure of the state of such a coin you could always request that the coins be sent to you while funds are held in an escrow until you are able to physically check for yourself that the coins are indeed not tampered with before releasing payment to the seller.

This is the responsibility of course of any buyer of physical coins to know the possible risks associated with physical funded crypto coins.

Hope this helps.

Updated the OP to reflect this explanation of the set described below. Will post the same on my website in the near future.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


October 19th, 2017

NOTICE REGARDING UNFUNDED "FUNDED" KAM SET #17

This set listed here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2258677.msg22877122#msg22877122

Was purchased in the early summer of 2017 by a customer.

The customer requested the entire set of coins be fully funded by them, with 1 BTC each.

They asked if they could have the coins funded after they were received in person given the high value of Bitcoin currently. After some thought and consideration I made an exception for this user as they were a repeat customer of mine and I had no reason to think they wouldn’t do what they said they would.

After some time this customer asked me to delay their package stating they were going on vacation for several weeks and would contact me when they returned.

Once they returned and requested shipment they requested their set to be shipped with COAs in a separate package to the set. I obliged and shipped their set.

At no point did this customer indicate that they did not want to fund the coins.

- - From the time they got the package until they sold the coins was likely a short time frame as the package shipped out in late August.

Given it was an international shipment, the package could take 2-5 weeks depending upon transit etc.

Then fast forward to last week (October 10th). I got a few messages about a unfunded “funded” set of my KAM coins. To my surprise I had not heard back yet from this customer and found that the set was being auctioned off on the bitcointalk.org forum. It was surprising how quick this set was resold before I could confront the original buyer about funding them.

It was my mistake in trusting this customer to do what they said they would in funding the coins as they initially requested.

All of the messages with this customer have been documented and indicate clearly that this set was supposed to be fully funded by them and given my willingness to work with them to attempt to avoid risk of shipping funded coins, in the end the agreement was broken on their end.

To be clear, this set is in no way an “error” set. There is nothing error-like about it other than that the purchaser reneged on their end of funding the set fully.

COIN ADDRESS LIST:
1FPBzVr7aPD8Mr5oTHdLA5pg465rDKzn3m
https://blockchain.info/address/1FPBzVr7aPD8Mr5oTHdLA5pg465rDKzn3m
1JqJJ1P7vXu2hZDkDq8XEkweXXjShqRNms
https://blockchain.info/address/1JqJJ1P7vXu2hZDkDq8XEkweXXjShqRNms
15pAT929xj87XsCPy2TvF4aQ28cEDnw7XQ
https://blockchain.info/address/15pAT929xj87XsCPy2TvF4aQ28cEDnw7XQ
1KG3nUFbyD6ojyyrCJ7ScAw8PSkpNamRky
https://blockchain.info/address/1KG3nUFbyD6ojyyrCJ7ScAw8PSkpNamRky
1P33yps8AnpbFLDwjKxB1dvXdaN481HgQg
https://blockchain.info/address/1P33yps8AnpbFLDwjKxB1dvXdaN481HgQg
1LsLAWenYzpeoZrJbEWqdPfYzKe5Uo2mku
https://blockchain.info/address/1LsLAWenYzpeoZrJbEWqdPfYzKe5Uo2mku
17WcL12JVCp9kSnr7FPY1iG7g5TAmjUg9V
https://blockchain.info/address/17WcL12JVCp9kSnr7FPY1iG7g5TAmjUg9V
16NXE3bAJCbntyrwcWZDK7hh2hc65GHjW
https://blockchain.info/address/16NXE3bAJCbntyrwcWZDK7hh2hc65GHjW
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZ6U0uAAoJEJqyV7+nZNgznXYH+gKC5XjF19mn/SZm6XD8dKPh
whU/CBAzeq4IxQsd0YwAOHe4fWJlQqUYMWqUb/HfJhhmB1FOlLEL94TLjLm9mnok
9/ulLtKVC7qUcGbIEos3raFILQODHCu4KrqTi3BSxIh/IeQ0bTEac5paGnX3mFKK
6MLd4ksFW2BwzivfcSmowH1029v//qSJA+dSZ3yBsV8SbmU+bROb/WS614581L5j
6t662RnLYwVOGu9JavcHDOQw262n2TK5hxKcgdtLe8oczw5Xf+UFIwUgztxrn6dk
N+BGNRy9scVvmUusi/h0FSubSelwfAMlU3Em8pWzwrdxfy/nwjrK+0ugVPmriIU=
=Z9jF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In my opinion and in my post I will indicate that this is not the case.

As my explanation will show there is no physical "error" about the set.

Of course anyone is free to claim anything is an error and attempt to sell it as that.

Perception is reality.

greenplastic you win.

I will likely end up putting up a post on the main KAM thread and probably my website (eventually) clearly stating that these coins are unfunded and that I've attempted to purchase them back in this auction, given the circumstances of them being unfunded.

Now that you will likely own the set, I would assume you wouldn't try to defraud any unsuspecting buyer who thinks the coins are funded, when they are not.

The explanation will be made in those two places on how this occurred and the general details surrounding the set.

1.905

1.775

1.765

1.755

1.705
edit bid for the increment.

1.605

1.505

1.405

1.335 BTC

Explanation of this set will come after the auction has ended.

This is not an “error” set as there was no physical error on my part in creating the set.

** If whomever is the bidder below my bid that wants the set and is willing to fund the set, I will gladly ship it to them after they fully fund the coins (after I receive it in my possession to inspect the set myself fist) and sell it to them for their last bid listed in this auction thread (the difference will be my incurred cost). Shipping would be on me as well.

1. There are no duplicate keys in our coins that are currently being held by customers.

2. It was an honest mistake that was determined to be isolated to miffman’s specific order of coins.

3. One reason why no post was made regarding this issue by LEALANA was because it could have caused unnecessary concern among customers who have our coins in their possession. 

4. While no one lost any money or was harmed, I welcome any customer with concerns to contact me directly.

I apologize if any of LEALANA customers felt that we should have made a post/announcement given the circumstances. It was determined that in the best interest of LEALANA and our customers and because it was an isolated incident, that such an announcement was unwarranted.

winning bid ^

Please send me your full shipping information.

this auction is now closed.

Winning bid ^.

This auction is now closed.

Will be in touch shortly.