|
-transparency on the same chain provides worse privacy for private tx through "guesses", especially when 99% of all tx are transparent
-who is more shady from the outside, one who uses tor from time to time or someone who lets everything go through tor? Filtering and tracking is much easier
-tainted coins, fungibility problem not 100% solved with optional privacy
About Mimblewimble
MW coins are linkable
miners see the rawtx, they are not encrypted
just when they are combined you cant undo it
but miners can literally datamine all the raw MW tx - also on the chain different in & outputs are visible
I'm long gone from coins that leave metadata on the chain for chainanalyse
|
|
|
|
mal wieder top news und der lite mode bei ARRR wird auf jeden fall den preis nach oben pushen - hoffe ich  apropo ARRR - gibt was neues von der top2o exchange zwecks intergrierung und stehen vielleicht andere börsen in der pipeline? Ist für juli jetzt angesetzt das Listing - hätte ich mir zwar früher gewünscht, aber naja - was soll man machen - viele andere Börsen die wir angeschrieben haben wollen meist über 2 BTC als Listungsgebühr haben, das sind jetzt mittlerweile über 20k $ - wir bemühen uns dennoch ARRR weiter voranzubringen |
|
|
|
A 51% attack on a Proof-of-Stake cryptocurrency is an unrealistic scenario and it's strange to bring this up as a critique against Spectrecoin. Think about what you are saying Acura: You believe someone can acquire more than half of all coins (!) and then will use that to attack the chain? Even if someone somehow managed to acquire such an enormous amount of coins (I doubt it would even be possible) it would cost this entity unbelievable sums as the price would increase to unforseeable heights and he would be the largest stakeholder in the network. So what possible reason could this entity then have to attack his own stake after spending an insane amount of money on this? It doesn't make much sense. The Spectrecoin developers have implemented a unique consensus algorithm (PoAS or 'StealthStaking') which makes Spectrecoin currently the only cryptocurrency that has truly anonymous staking! The dual-coin system of Spectrecoin is a massive advantage and not a weakness. It allows users to choose. It allows services to implement xspec whereas spectre might be more difficult, or technically or legally impossible. To quote Satoshi Nakamoto: 'If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry' Acura, I will make a spectre transaction and you will tell me where it ends up ok? Since by your claims Spectrecoin is not a good privacy coin because it has a dual-coin system, it should be very easy for you to track this transaction. Let's see if there is some substance behind your claims or if it was all just hot air to pump your Pirate bags. I wish you good luck  https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xspec/tx.dws?8d17d8ecd9e5e32c8c2eebd1efd0e670a84e374d7d147c9177f552c6de35d206So please tell me where this payment came from and where it ends up. Hint: it originally was in public xspec. Since you claim Spectrecoin's dual-coin system is allegedly a privacy weakness, I am REALLY interested to see this proven now. Your statement shows that you have not understood how easy it is for chain analysis companies to deanonimize such transactions. I prefer you to read the pdf file ...It can be applied to all coins with optional privacy Answer me the question, what percentage of all Spectrecoin users use the shielded feature? 0,5% ? 1% ? 3% ? 5%? But while Spectrecoin gives the user the choice of using transparent or privacy, Pirate’s addresses are forced to be private. And this is exactly where the difference lies. Data protection in Spectrecoin is optional, i.e. parts of the blockchain are transparent. Where as Pirate is completely anonymous. ConclusionBoth crypto currencies use advanced technology and algorithms. The transactions and thus the blockchain of Pirate are 99.9% anonymous, where as Spectrecoin does not offer forced anonymous transactions, furthermore in Spectrecoin large parts of the blockchain are transparent. The Spectrecoin brand name promises a lot, but the technology is no better than other optional privacy coins. In contrast, Pirates transactions are private by default, which encourages greater use of these transactions and provides more network security. |
|
|
|
Oh aus Komodo wird Antara. Das ist schon noch sehr ungewohnt... aber danke auf jeden fall für den link. da sind sehr viele interessante news zu lesen  und nicht vergessen den thread hier rechtzeitig umzubenennen Komodo als Name bleibt, nur das Framework welches zum erstellen von Blockchains innerhalb von 2min angedacht ist, heißt Antara. Bin auch sehr gespannt. https://komodoplatform.com/komodo-and-the-early-pioneers-of-atomic-swaps/ |
|
|
|
thank you both for your answers. So Spectrecoin has no technical protection against 51% attacks like dPow from Komodo, or Chainlocks from Dash. And the fact that a user can go from a transparent state to a protected one may be quite great (optional privacy), but the fact that he afterwards switches back to a transparent transaction only to be able to deposit his coin on an exchange, for example - allows deanonimizing already by the low use of the feature. Even with Zcash, only 4-6% use the shielded feature, even this low usage is enough to deanonimize the users behind the chain analysis. Proof: https://cryptolux.org/images/d/d9/Zcash.pdfSpectre will be no exception, as well as many other coins with optional privacy. If Spectre here is so great and anonymous, why don't you read about it anywhere? Why doesn't Darkmarket use it? Why is he not represented on Binance? Why doesn't he win in comparison with Monero? I think Spectre is now almost 4 years old... I now save myself the rest that I could still bring. So much for the statement "Best privacy coin" ... |
|
|
|
Sorry for the hard words, but spectrecoin is a joke...
I see a public Richlist... much privacy
I see public Metadata exist on the Chain for Chainanalys
I see no 51% double spends resistance
I see transparent Transactions
Even if only 5% of the people use the privacy feature this is enough to deanonymize the people anyway.
My previous choice of Privacycoins remains
1st ARRR Piratechain
2.XMR Monero
It is possible to forgive rough words, but not deliberate lie or misleading! You were able to lie on all four counts. The project has 2 coins: public (xspec) and private (spectrecoin), therefore what is seen in the blockchain is xspec. Spectrecoin is not tracked. The rich list also consists of wallets whose owners did not transfer xspec to spectre for any reason. Below I will leave a link to a rich list, you will see in 1 place anonymous - the researcher can not identify anonymous spectre and relate them to wallets, so he considers them for 1 wallet! Show us how you were able to evade hidden transactions, but you will not be able to confirm any of his statements. You aggressively defend your project, which no one thought to attack. That's low. Cryptoprotection large and the competition all at hand - forces you to grow. https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xspec/#!rich So Spectrecoin is a coin with optional privacy (transparent & shielded transactions)- we all know what that means in terms of privacy... So i see metadata on the Chain - sender , amount, input / output - there is no lie about that I see public Richlist with all metadata - Wow, the first place is anonymous from the top500 And what is with 51% double Spend resistance... so Spectrecoin has no protection against it ? Where is that a lie ? Everyone here in the forum and on the internet will agree with me that coins with optional privacy are a waste of time. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry for the hard words, but spectrecoin is a joke...
I see a public Richlist... much privacy
I see public Metadata exist on the Chain for Chainanalys
I see no 51% double spends resistance
I see transparent Transactions
Even if only 5% of the people use the privacy feature this is enough to deanonymize the people anyway.
My previous choice of Privacycoins remains
1st ARRR Piratechain
2.XMR Monero
|
|
|
|
Few other notes and clarifications about information that we have already shared. - The much waited rebrand is going live on July 15th together with the Antara Framework launch. - Antara is a framework used to develop customizeable and purpose-built Smart Chains - 'Chain Lizard' was an codename for the blockchain generator app. The branded name is "Antara Composer" (Antara Smart Chain Composer) - Antara Composer app is used to launch new Smart Chains on AWS infastructure within a minute (new product) - AtomicDEX is a multi-coin wallet with atomic swap support. It is currently in closed beta & heavy testing. (new product) https://twitter.com/binance/status/1145615561180639232https://twitter.com/gamecredits/status/1144288499987832839
|
|
|
|
wird es für KMD keine Agama wallet mehr geben? (ich weiss, dass man bei der Verus version auch den KMD coin hinzufügen kann) und heute soll ja die neue exchange für ARRR bekannt gegeben werden - bin schon gespannt  Soweit ich weiß wird es Agama weiter geben - Bin auch gespannt ob das Liting heute erfolgt - hinter vorgehaltener Hand gibts das Gerücht das sie grad probleme haben mit dem integrieren von Z Adressen |
|
|
|
muss man bei der PirateOcean wallet für jede transaktion eine neue empfangsadresse generieren?
will jetzt nichts falsch machen, bevor ich meinen restbestand an ARRR von DigitalPrice zu meiner wallet gui schicke
Soweit mir bekannt kannst du immer ein und dieselbe Adresse nutzen bei PirateoceanQT. Wichtig ist denn PrivKey mitunter zu speichern von der Adresse. Heute oder morgen sollte das Listing kommen auf der neuen Börse. |
|
|
|
A new release of Agama has been posted: https://github.com/VerusCoin/Agama/releases/tag/v0.5.7-2This release fixes the following: ```Fixed max amount handling with unknown fees (e.g. BTC where fees are calculated when a tx is created) Fixed init crash after enabling custom electrum servers.``` |
|
|
|
bevor ARRR auf der top20 exchange gelistet wird und dann bestimmt noch weitere folgen werden, habe ich meinen "verlorenen" bestand, heute wieder komplett neu nachgekauft. gehe davon aus, dass ARRR demnächst nicht mehr so billig zu haben wird. als ARRR wallet werde ich jetzt die PirateOcean wallet benutzen also, bin wieder am Pirate board - ahoi wird es demnächst ein neues update der agama wallet geben? Es wird Updates bei Wallet geben, aktuell nutze ich die Verus Agama 0.5.7.1 Version - manch andere nutzen auch die PirateOceanQT - Was wir brauchen sind Litewallets, die sind bereits in der Mache, wir alle wollen sie haben - glaubt mir. Heute gab es auch Lob vom offiziellen Zcash Team zwecks der Anonymität von Pirates : https://twitter.com/ZcashFoundation/status/1142825729005981696?s=19Schauen wir mal was diese kommende Woche so bringt: 2 Exchanges listings sind schonmal drinn laut meinen Infos. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
