New projects on TokenLab:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
New article in our blog::Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
New projects on TokenLab:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
We finally started our blog and have some interesting information to share with you in near future. Now you may read about:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
looks like interestin project with experienced team Need some time to make an assesment of your project also
|
|
|
New projects on TokenLab:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
New projects on TokenLab:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
New projects on TokenLab:Join us on Telegram!
|
|
|
Do you charge to rate or are you completely independent?
No, we are completely independent I like that you have specific parameters for rating the ICO. But I don't see my favorite project Hashrush and then stormx. Does the ICO developer have to pay you to get their project listed?
Thank you. No, its free
|
|
|
New projects on TokenLab:Nice project. Are you going to offer a technical analysis of the ICO contracts?
Yes. Contact us for details via e-mail
|
|
|
That's an interesting project.
People need more information and reviews about ICOs and tokens.
Promising project. Waited long for such rating agency.
Thank you a lot! We will do our best to do better and better.
|
|
|
Our main goal is to provide crystal clear assessment of upcoming and ongoing projects on the market. Each evaluation is set manually and adjusted later when it changes. We do not use data parsing to avoid errors.
We developed TLI (TokenLab Index) - index calculated by more than 20 parameters for companies which are planning to launch an ICO and token sale or have already done it. Currently, there are several people working in our team of analysts who have an unbiased assessment of the projects:
- reading WhitePapers
- view the profiles of team members ICO projects
- testing MVP (if available)
- watch and rate activities in social networks
- evaluate the previous investment activity (from venture funds, business angels)
- evaluate the activity in the media
- explore the technical details of smart contracts, etc.
Each rating in the index has several criteria — weighting factors. They depend on the importance of the object. For example, for a team, the weight factor is the maximum, since the team and its experience are very important. And for the age of the domain, the weighting coefficient is minimal, since this parameter is not very important. Now we have more than 120 projects on our website and continue to add new ICOs every day.We strongly believe that this project will help people to spend less time for project assessment and at the same time make considered investment decisions. We will be thankful for a feedback and comments concerning our project:)
|
|
|
username:IEATZU
Would be nice to have an actual team playground. Other than the adhoc teaming in king of the hill. Payouts for team in the lead for x minutes could be randomly selected from all team members weighted by their mass at the time. Probably like 3 members get paid or something each period.
Also would be nice if you had an entirely different game to play to like diep.io I like that game to.. though obviously that is a bigger task.
I'd prefer to simply watch a video ad every 10 minutes and remove most of the ads on the site. Need a stretch break anyway between rounds sometimes and a bit of time to trash talk. That'd work well for the standard timed playgrounds, not sure how could do that with king of the hill, maybe pause the whole game? Not sure.
Oh and for paid playground,you need a queue set up where I can simply click and say I'd like to play as soon as 5 other players want to play, and you could have a popup on my screen if I'm in another game section to tell me the round will begin in 30 seconds so I can leave and go play. I don't play paid because it's hard to get others coordinated to play, and then you have to wait until a new round begins. It's just not convenient.
And how about this, base payout around how many people are playing, as in if had 50 in the room could double the payout or something.
|
|
|
I followed the same steps. Mine did open on vbe7. Then I edited the voltage, core clocks and fan control on vbe7, saved it to a new file name then flash it. Card accepted it. Editing in vbe7 corrected the checksum.
Hrmm.... not sure what I could have done wrong.. Guess will try again. NEvermind, I'm an idiot, I thought vbe7 didn't open it, and was still showing the previous cards bios I opened but it did actually load it, and once I saved it with vbe7 it corrected the checksum. The part about using vbe7 is not present in the tutorial though. Should be added. Whats your hashrate? on that card it didn't change. 70 HS/s. Not sure....Probably doing something dumb.
|
|
|
I followed the same steps. Mine did open on vbe7. Then I edited the voltage, core clocks and fan control on vbe7, saved it to a new file name then flash it. Card accepted it. Editing in vbe7 corrected the checksum.
Hrmm.... not sure what I could have done wrong.. Guess will try again. NEvermind, I'm an idiot, I thought vbe7 didn't open it, and was still showing the previous cards bios I opened but it did actually load it, and once I saved it with vbe7 it corrected the checksum. The part about using vbe7 is not present in the tutorial though. Should be added.
|
|
|
I just followed the instructions on that russian tutorial.
However, after I modified the bios, and tried to open it with VBE7 program (just to verify it was valid) it says the checksum is wrong and won't open it. Then I actually flashed it to the card, and it showed the new information to be blank on the card like it normally says old info was Taithti PRO or whatnot, and new info says Taithti Pro.. But this time it was all blank for the new info, so I pussed out and put back the original bios on it. In never rebooted the system.
Is that normal for the new info fields to be blank, I wouldn't think so. Thanks.
Here's what ATiwinflash output on the modified bios. C:\Users\1a\Desktop\biosstuff\atiflash_274>ATIFLASH.EXE -f -p 0 0mod.ROM Old DeviceID: 679A New DeviceID: 0 Old Product Name: TAHITI PRO GDDR5 3GB BIOS New Product Name: Old BIOS Version: 015.025.000.099.000000 New BIOS Version: Flash type: GD25Q10TCP 20000/20000h bytes programmed 20000/20000h bytes verified
Restart System To Complete VBIOS Update.
After that I reverted to original.
|
|
|
Arghhhh, no idea how to do this... I've flashed bios before on these even, but never hex edited a bios file I have according to GPUz and the lookup function. 2 Sapphire HD 7950 Vapor-X OC Boost Elpida Sapphire HD 7970 OC Boost w Hynix 2 Sapphire HD 7950 FleX OC Boost w Elipida PowerColor PCS+ HD 7950 w Elipida Sapphire HD 7950 Dual-X with Boost w Elipida Then a Sapphire Vapor-X R9 280X OC with hynix MSI HD 7970 OC w Hynix mem Is there a tutorial somewhere.
|
|
|
|