Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 06:58:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: November 19, 2019, 08:29:41 AM
It depends what expenses you have. I'm using my small rig to heat my home so actually it's paying itself by just generating heat. Everything else is just pure profit.

Just like the old days of mining Bitcoin. Smiley

I live in a warm temperate to arid area, so the excess heat is usually unwanted, except in the coldest parts of Winter. The temperature today is going to peak around 35 degrees C.

...surely there must be a more efficient way to heat your house? Your GPU is basically like a simple foot heater, so its efficiency is very low compared to something like reverse cycle A/C.

Good answer - I like it.

I apologize that my question is a little off topic.
For addresses that have an output transaction, people retrieve R, S and Z values from a  Bitcoin Transaction.
The process of obtaining (extracting) R, S and Z values from a Bitcoin Transaction is known and understandable to me.
Another thing is not clear - the practical application of the parameters R, S and Z. Is there a thread on this forum that discusses the practical application of these parameters R, S and Z?
And secondly, the 2coin.org resource often freezes and does not work.
Is there any other resource similar to 2coin.org?
Perhaps there is a stand-alone script or software option on GitHub?
Tell me.


wow, man thks for 2coins, very usefull
22  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: November 08, 2019, 07:27:35 PM
I have imported 27,000 completed ranges into the pool DB.  I did it in such a way as to not affect any ones current stake.  It will just increase our chances of finding the solution a little sooner.

http://www.ttdsales.com/64bit/
what type of range you mean ? those 27,000 are range of what size ?!!
I am still want to join your pool but need Ubunto version first  Sad

I think it is about the number of batches issued for calculation. 27,000 size ranges in hex FFFFFFFF.
it also could be FF
23  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: November 08, 2019, 04:52:46 PM

The pool is now running ~6.25 billion keys a second and has around 80 users.  Only about 10 are active currently though. 



so and my question is still in air, what y gona do when there would be 1865156715671567841784 range?

1865156715671567841784
                      6000000000 billions?
24  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: November 06, 2019, 11:59:09 AM
I added the current amount you will get paid to top 10 list if solution is found.  Takes into account the real time value of bitcoin.

http://www.ttdsales.com/64bit/


i think(thats only mu thought and decisions), that bitcrack is rather stupid, because you don't know where and what are you doing.. in fact you all time bit a rock...but it's only my thought,  what you gone do in range 12873562336973246598716213543 - 48975348027768076943679-84769847698 ?

I think bitcrack is not a tool for all time work, bytheway while you checking 1mlrd addresses you can loose another one with balance
25  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: October 23, 2019, 01:14:15 PM
I have been trying to solve the puzzle but every time I tried I got an headache. I dont know where to start and I keep on researching until I end up with nothing. I even ask some of my friends who are good with this things but I cannot understand fully their explanation. I guess I will stop doing the challenge and will focus on the signature campaign. Well good luck to you guys in solving the puzzle its hopeless for me.
Just a every day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=im2VlRprLVc

how can i play the same? )
26  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 30, 2019, 07:59:50 AM
#64

9000000000000000   -     900008c8cdbfc000
fe38B13505B26867   -     fe38b4e9a9e18000
fe08b4e9a9e18000   -      fe38b28c4dcdf000
f908b4e9a9e18000   -      f908b83fef996800
e908b4e9a9e18000  -      e908b8e3fd70a800
f200000000000000   -      f20007dc504d4000
a0dea1390507f800   -      a0decf332bc7f800
f4430518eaddc000   -      f44309cb5f5dc000
d39b97986985a000  -      d39bf99dea45a000
c89526398b87e000  -      c895840b4507e000
de1df04147b1b000  -       de1df13e0f31b000
e3ef4e58aa31b000   -      e3efc87af531b000
cde0b6b3a7640000  -      cde0c690b6a40000

This ranges are already scanned.
 


why do check this ranges?
27  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 16, 2019, 10:56:34 AM
-o, --out FILE
    Append private keys to FILE, one per line

can bitcrack save adresses in file or only private keys?
to this file bitcrack record found addresses with keys.one per line.can also be called as you want -o 1out.txt, -o myrich.txt ,etc.

try to use this function, but don't see files that bitcrack record, where is it saves, in bin??
in windows it saves in the same folder where the bitcrack is located. the file is created as soon as at least 1 key is found.

maybe i sad wrong, i need all keys and adresses which bitcrack goes to save
28  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 16, 2019, 10:04:06 AM
-o, --out FILE
    Append private keys to FILE, one per line

can bitcrack save adresses in file or only private keys?
to this file bitcrack record found addresses with keys.one per line.can also be called as you want -o 1out.txt, -o myrich.txt ,etc.

try to use this function, but don't see files that bitcrack record, where is it saves, in bin??
29  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 16, 2019, 07:13:39 AM
-o, --out FILE
    Append private keys to FILE, one per line

can bitcrack save adresses in file or only private keys?
30  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 11, 2019, 04:34:34 PM
can anyony told me how to use --continue to save a result of scan private and addr?
or mb show a command?

 use first time -  xxBitCrack -c -u -i target.txt -o finish.txt --keyspace 1:FFFFFFFFFFF -continue step.txt
 and after       -  xxBitCrack -c -u -i target.txt -o finish.txt -continue step.txt

How do u guys convert hex to wif? offline?

 -target.txt - this is must be?

 -continue step.txt - wtf this?

thanks
-i target.txt(-i   IN)*(target.txt)a text file with your addresses, you can name it whatever you like. -continue step.txt(also can name whatever) here the program will record your progress and after restarting it will start from the place where it stopped.-continue does not work if the -r(random) flag is enabled.


Great! Thanks, go test it
31  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 11, 2019, 04:11:46 PM
can anyony told me how to use --continue to save a result of scan private and addr?
or mb show a command?

 use first time -  xxBitCrack -c -u -i target.txt -o finish.txt --keyspace 1:FFFFFFFFFFF -continue step.txt
 and after       -  xxBitCrack -c -u -i target.txt -o finish.txt -continue step.txt

How do u guys convert hex to wif? offline?

 -target.txt - this is must be?

 -continue step.txt - wtf this?

thanks
32  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 11, 2019, 11:21:57 AM
can anyony told me how to use --continue to save a result of scan private and addr?
or mb show a command?
33  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: September 10, 2019, 02:06:36 PM
anyony start in ubuntu 2+ gpu in bitcrack? how to do this?
34  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 29, 2019, 09:35:12 AM
IMHO
ranges should go from blah...blah...00000000 to blah...blah...FFFFFFFF
just to keep things neat and tidy.  maybe i am OCD.

why are all these bizarre ranges being scanned?
like 2b87eefd01e43a40 - 2b87f0798ea43a40
it makes no sense to me.

is something being converted from decimal?
that makes even less sense.

i just don't get it.  enlighten me.

Yeah so that range is within the 62-bit range, what is the problem?

i am just saying that, for me, for reasons of accounting and clarity, in my messed up mind (and probably in the perfectly good minds of others), i prefer a block to start on a 00 and end on FF.  

for example:
A600000000 - A6FFFFFFFF
3B92C70000000000 - 3B92C7FFFFFFFFFF
0000 - FFFF

like that.  it makes sense to me and is easy to understand.

what i do not understand, is how people come up with these ranges with some arbitrary collection of least significant bytes.
(no example given)

and i wonder where these come from.  are hands mashed down on a hex keyboard?  is it somebody's birthday?  their name in ascii?  is it just random?  is it some nice round decimal number that converts to god-awful looking hex.  Why is decimal even mentioned in this forum?

just wondering why.  not saying it is right or wrong.  it just does not align with my thought process.


Well the way I have been getting my starting points is by taking #61 hex key, converting it to decimal, multiplying it by anything from 1.1 to 2.9 and then converting it back to hex, then the ending key is the original decimal value plus how many addresses I've searched then converted back to hex.

But now I won't be posting any more ranges because I'm using random..

i was testing bitcrack in random...it will never find nothing as i decided...  he was looking to find 1 add in 3mlrd range ...6 hours)) lol
35  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 27, 2019, 01:16:59 PM
I tried to test clbittrack on old laptop, and found some interesting. It works on integrated laptop graphics card with speed 12-14MKey/sec, but on integrated CPU with speed just 0.8-1MKey/sec.

HOWEVER, CPU made real calclulations and found the solution (for #61 wallet), but graphics card showed 15times more speed, but found nothing. I selected very short range with the know key --> pls have a look at the screen shot.



How could it be? Why clbitcrack with the graphic card just wasting the time?
So, the quiestion is also - could that speed showed with RTX2080ti devices (1,200-1,300 MKey/sec) also be just waste of time without real search?


i tested at almost founded addreses, and it find, but only on 1.
hm maybe you make some mistakes in commands? is it real?
36  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 26, 2019, 01:23:33 PM
I read again most of the results posted here, and collected them to one table. Of corse results could differ from card to card depending on the settings. I also add the price of the CUDA. I tried to collect some benchmark. If you have some other device - pls, do not hesitate to add  Roll Eyes

Code:
1. RTX 2080ti    1,200-1,300M key/sec  (price $1,200-1,500)
2. GTX 1070      250 Mkey/sec          (price $450-550)
3. GTX 1080ti    150 Mkey/sec          (price $700-1,000)
4. GTX 680       109 Mkey/sec          (price $150)
5. RX 480        107 Mkey/sec          (price $130-150)
6. RX 470        105 Mkey/sec          (price $150-300)
7. RX 580        89 Mkey/sec           (price $200-250)
8. RX 560        50 Mkey/sec           (price $100-150)
9. R9 280/290x   20 Mkey/sec           (price $50)


i got RX 580        110-120 Mkey/sec  with no boost
37  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 26, 2019, 11:54:02 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?


What is your goal? I made for myself such a digital lottery - generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it. But it was not bitcrack.
Do you want just a list of random hex+addr? It will not be useful cause it will be difficult later to compare all these random results with the already scanned ranges.


i am just start using bitcrack, i was using my own algo on python, but it is very slow, very slow...

can you wrote a command - "generated a random number between the range and check the corresponding wallet to it"   also it would be great to save data. hex and addr for base
 
thanks
38  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 26, 2019, 05:57:21 AM
no this verion of bitcrack dont have random included

can i scan random and save the result of scan?  hex + addr?
39  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 26, 2019, 04:28:27 AM

[/quote]
-r is random. this is from pikachu release

[/quote]


doesn't work in https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack ?
40  Other / Off-topic / Re: [ARCHIVE] Bitcoin challenge discusion on: August 25, 2019, 06:01:41 PM
i make random from 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 with 120 Shares with 3 nvidia Cards

i search also from beginning and in the middle all low spaces between all with random and share Funktion

all with Shell script automated restart after 20 min

Looks like that

Code:
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 1/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 1/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 1/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 1/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 2/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 2/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 2/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 2/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 3/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 3/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 3/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 3/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 4/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 4/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 4/120
timeout 20m ./cuBitCrack.exe -d 0 -i addr.txt -c -o found1.txt -r --keyspace 347AE147AE147AE1:4000000000000000 -b 15 -t 512 -p 3200 --share 4/120

Maybe i help some newbies here Smiley

not understand, can you wrote step buy step what are happening)))
addr.txt - you already got it?
 -r what is it?
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!