Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 »
|
it kinda sux that the rewards have been private members only till now
It is not correct. The project has been announced at cyberc0n almost 1 year ago (please keep in mind that the distribution from this presentation has been significantly changed based on the community feedback). Access to validator set was available for everybody since euler-1, every bit of decision has been discussed in #fuckgoogle at telegram. Those who participated last year in euler-4 have rewards in the form of 0.27% of Genesis for supporting the network which is not significant but really important for guys who invested into bootstrap. github public
IMHO to be "github public" has more grassroots than "bitcointalk public". To be honest I did not want to post on the bitcointalk because I saw how bloated and scamy it become. So I wanted to attract real engineers first. Sorry for that.
|
|
|
So much of development around ideas of a more resilient web. Yet we still fail to build the most important piece on the road to replace ALL THE SHIT we use every day. I am talking about Google. In the tenth Bitcoin birthday January 3, 2019, the cyber network has been introduced to those who believe that search on the Internet can be better, can do more. Want to thank everybody who helps to build this vision for last and upcoming years. I invite the broader community to participate and bring more relevance to yourself, for everybody. https://github.com/cybercongress/cyberd/blob/master/docs/cyberd.md
|
|
|
this is an atypical ICO arrangement.
What I noticed is that many comments here reflect a misunderstanding of apocalyptic proportions. I can only refer to the terms and conditions. These are carefully written and should pretty much speak for themselves: we are not doing what under today's convention is understood as an ICO, we do not issue any shares in a company and we give no promises about any (possible) future rewards. But if you enjoy this project and want to support it, we are happy to receive your benevolent donation. A donation is a donation and not a deposit. Once donated, the donations belong to us and we can spend them, burn them, use them to make the world a better place or do whatever is up to our imagination. My personal intention is not only donating myself. I strive to provide ultimate transparency for exciting fundings here https://cyber.fund/radar. And we need to calculate raised money as well.
|
|
|
A lot of interesting happens here. I'd like to put some if code will be released
|
|
|
BitShares pros: - The most scalable in-memory blockchain - Monetisation of issued assets using custom fees - Really fast 1.5 sec average conformation no matter what is your tx about - Smartcoins (bitUSD, bitCNY, bitEUR) allow to build trustless processes with off-line businesses - Forward thinking community - Built-in referral program - Community client is built for in-browser use on steroids (web-sockets + react) - Network explorer (Cryptofresh.com) will be open-sourced soon - Fast adoption signals - Truly decentralized blockchain self-paid development team - Technological certainty as Bitshares already passed the most hard iterations trying to find minimum lovable product - DPoS
BitShares cons - Currently smartcoins have low liquidity - Currently multisig don't work in clent - No asset-based voting and account control - No ability to create assets with locked supply. UIA are always issuer dependent in some sense.
NXT pros: - Convenient Phasing and Account control allow you to build highly customized processes - Data Storage, Marketplace
NXT cons: - No ability to monetize assets through custom fees - Very slow in comparison with BitShares and slow in comparison with Ethereum - Stagnating community and network activity - Development and consensus through BDFL model (with all honour to Jean-Luc) - Weak improvement process: If you develop custom soft, so get ready for sudden API changes - Huge uncertainty caused by NXT 2.0 - Naive PoS
Summing up if you need asset with exchange without all bells and whistles of NXT (alias, data storage, marketplace) go BitShares. If ability to build sophisticated asset-based voting processes is crucial for your use case go NXT. Otherwise go BitShares.
If you need really deep custom things go Ethereum (much custom, significantly slower than BitShares but much more faster than NXT)
|
|
|
We updated info about results of Lisk crowdsale https://cyber.fund/system/LiskTotal Tokens: 100000000 Tokens Sold: 85000000 Raised: 13750,28579618 BTC + 328,90002926 BTC + 80696176.84699945 XCR *0,000 013 00 BTC = 15128.236124451 BTC Average Initial Price (will be used for pre-public cap calculations and lifetime CMGR calculation): BTC AIP: 0.000177979 USD AIP: 0.07297139 Pre-Public Fixed Cap: BTS Cap: 17,798 USD Cap: 7,297,139 All calculations are unofficial and preliminary and was done based on information provided by Lisk Foundation on site. Calculations can be changed in case of Lisk foundation provide clarifying proofs.
|
|
|
Very interesting project, will come back  Came back and it's dead! Not surprised at all?  Ups. Not yet. There was no interest from this thread. That is why it is calm. We've raised 5 bitcoins and turned them all back in accordance with terms. We are developing now using our own resources. Today we announce that we support balance autoupdate for 15 blockchain protocols and 35 blockchains assets including Ethereum, Factom, NXT, BitShares etc. https://blog.cyber.fund/blockchain-balances-2cdb4a710f8
|
|
|
Hi guys. I'd like to share a paper draft and a corresponding PoC implementation of what I am working on. tldr: Paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vz-yS9W-l-Wdqbw3n0SFwXyYFv0Xo-F4i8NbXQvGHxg/editPoC implementation: https://cyber.fund/tracking (sortable by rating) Here are 2 reasons why I need such a thing: Coinmarketcap sucks for me. Superficial methodology of cap calculation, proprietary software, almost absence of due diligence for markets and systems, no transactional analytics. That is definitely not the information I would like to rely on my investment road.. I believe it could be done better. I expect explosion of high quality investment opportunities due to developments of Ethereum, BitShares and Sidechains . Basic idea behind cyber•Rating is to gather all meaningful cryptoproperty regardless of underlying technology. Think of it like S&P of blockchains. But S&P is not just a rating. It rely on IFRS or GAAP. So when I started to work on rating I stuck with an issue of comparable reporting and criteria. I came to exciting conclusions that could become foundations for the Internet of things, values, chains and everything. In a paper I discuss design of a proposed system. All reporting logic is based on a foundations mostly has been built by BitShares. Paper is a draft and is not published yet. A document is editable by anybody. PoC implementation in fact does not implement blockchain reporting yet and this is an issue for the next year. But even now it show very interesting non opinionated results that are far better than Coingecko. Christmas Bonus: https://cyber.fund/tracking contain very interesting CMGR indicator that you wont find anywhere. We've audited all historical data for all blockchains that allow to calculate Compound Monthly Growth Rate. It like CAGR but monthly. It is recalculated real time. Enjoy!
|
|
|
Reading
Interesting, I'll keep an eye and see how it's going. Might purchase a few hours before ICO ends.
Just curious why you want to postpone a decision? We know that flat sale could not make good deal. But what is your rationale? Would you invest if we gather 10 BTC or if 42 BTC?
|
|
|
node.js, appreciate your contribution to fighting with NODE either fools or scammers... But I suppose both. Interested in ICO. 1 Question. Have you heard about Crypti project? (I am not affiliated yet) But guys are building Dapps platform with strong focus on Node.js applications. How you want to distinguish Crypti and your project? Wouldn't be better to join them? 2 Question. Guys from Ethereum implemented the protocol using JS. Again, not exactly the same, but probably you can start from there using live, almost ready to use protocol and network? Create Genesis block the same as initial Ethereum investors and you likely get support and interest from some of 9k smart guys? 3 Question. Maybe its better to implement Ethereum using raw Node.js? That are just considerations, not a statements!
|
|
|
We listed Skycoin in RadarLet me know if there are inaccuracies. That is so pity that we still was not able to get tokens, though we wrote a lot both in BitMessage and this thread... Awful management of such critical process.
|
|
|
Recently we release two new features: - Radar: Allow you to see upcoming crowdsales into meaningful blockchain projects. - Portfolio: Allow you to track you blockchain investment portfolio in one convenient place. We are beta testing now! So need any feedback. Portfolio feature for public accounts is free forever. For private accounts it is free only while in beta. PM me your Skype! I'd like to hangout with you about your experience with cyber•Fund!
|
|
|
So what is this, i received some cyberShare through the NXT asset exchange a couple months ago out of nowhere.
We begin sharedrop to NXT shareholders in accordance with our plan to unite awesome communities
|
|
|
300 cyber•Shares for zercrypt - He is lucky! Others, pls check - 10 cyber•Shares for participation! Happy new year!
|
|
|
akYmmHbQ87za4P78hdYxLLJZ8vwnYBpb4Yu
cybershares will have a good feature. 3i is shit.
happy new year
Happy new year! Why do you think that 3i is shit?
|
|
|
akXFQhUNhMSY3aPZ3RVDgg2RE7ctRxCvHHF
happy new year
PS I did not get my introductory fund because I have sent my counterparty address instead of coinprism. Would you still consider ? thank you.
Yes! I've send you bounty and new year gift :-) But you can still try to import you XCP private keys to coinprism wallet - so you can possess both
|
|
|
|