|
has someone made a ClosedEx joke yet
|
|
|
|
Buying in bulk, PM with reasonable offers
to save time, what constitutes a reasonable offer: when last market price is hovering in 0.07/0.06 and occasionally flirting with 0.05 and below in last hours (lowpoint ~0.04) asking for 2x,3x this amount as some have offered is nonsense. If you are looking to offload bulk quickly, this is still buyers market. with the considerable bulk of the volume still tied up in addresses generated without full installation (lazy burners) and waiting to be unloaded with the forthcoming release of thin wallet we will see a price drop which will not be offset by the new interest generated. Therefore either trade at the price you want to sell on centralised exchanges, by putting up small asks in batches and waiting for your xxxx XCP to sell in time which is a tedious process, place a market order and drag the price down due to thin orderbook OR offload all in bulk at fixed price here. |
|
|
|
|
I would be interested in a service which can interface with counterparty to allow a user to buy and later redeem a voucher
presumably, an asset would be created; for example 'amazongift10', the user would pay a price pegged to USD 10 equivalent to receive 1 'amazongift10', and would later navigate to a website, enter their email address and then make a tx of this asset, or some other similar mechanism
Please forgive my ignorance on the technical aspects.
If any developers out there feel they are capable of creating such a service (if it is even possible) please get in touch discuss & negotiate.
|
|
|
|
|
Buying in bulk, PM with reasonable offers
|
|
|
|
2014-03-11 07:54:51 Sell 0.00410 13.000
2014-03-11 07:53:29 Sell 0.00410 64.000 to the seller, please if you have more available do get in touch for bulk sells |
|
|
|
It seems he sold users info to other companies, just received this email on my BitAds exclusive email:
Are you sure that you only used it for BitAds? Because I also received that e-mail on one of the e-mail addresses that I did not use for BitAds. It doesn't sound like a move that he would make since he could earn a lot more from just selling BitAds/BitVegas. Bit weird if you ask me. I can't tell I'm 100% sure, our mind sometimes trick us, but I could say I'm 99.9% sure. The inbox only has one email, and it's from CampBX. And I didn't receive any other CampBX email to my other inbox's. I got this e-mail today ------------------------- Hi xxx+bitads@gmail.com, Receive 0.02 BTC for free at CampBX! Register a new account or log in into existing one and enter this code 245405 here! If you have any questions, please contact us at https://CampBX.com/contact.php or refer to the FAQ page at https://CampBX.com/faq.php for more information. Welcome to CampBX! - CampBX Team ------------------------- In the beginning, they link directly to http://www.flashupdatepageversion.com/index.php which is a website that tells you to download a .exe file. Doesn't seem very legit. Also, as you might've noticed, I added "+bitads" to my gmail address when registering at bitads, so that's where they got my e-mail. Anyone else got the same e-mail? Yes same email; Marked as free CampBX coins, redirect to flashupdate malware I also used unique Tag which marks BitAds as the culprit of leaking my email. either they have been compromised or are knowingly selling this data to hackers. |
|
|
|
Yes same email; Marked as free CampBX coins, redirect to flashupdate malware I also used unique Tag which marks BitAds as the culprit of leaking my email. either they have been compromised or are knowingly selling this data to hackers. |
|
|
|
Trading doesnt work at bter?
seems it's down for last 4 and a half hours, based on last trade data. had wondered why my buys were not being filled. coinmarketcap now includes BTER trade volume into consideration when accounting for XCP daily trade volume which is nice addition |
|
|
|
Wont't P2P exchanges bloat the blockchain even more?
Nope, CounterParty (XCP) P2P DEX currently uses multisig transactions as a means of escrow, with advent of Bitcoin 0.9 it will transition seamlessly to implementing OP_RETURN which can be pruned |
|
|
|
Sorry if this is a dumb question or not really in the scope of the protocl but I had an idea a while ago that I would like to make into a reality if possible;
1) issue an asset ie: DOMINOS on the DEX. Each share would equate to one 10$ pizza voucher
2) The buyer would pay in DEX or BTC (pegged to USD) or whatever mechanism is suitable so that issuer does not lose money
3) somehow the voucher would be sent to the buyer. As I understand this is not possible in the protocol itself, but maybe the buyer would prove they have ownership of 1 DOMINOS with a key or signed message or something, and then be able to input some proof of ownership to a web-site, the voucher would then be automatically sent to an email address provided and marked as spent.
is such at thing possible? I love the idea of the decentralised exchange & if possible want to built some link to the 'real-world' on it.
My understanding is the asset DOMINOS, will act like a giftcard for 10$. So, the customer can purchase this asset in the distributed exchange. When they need to redeem it for a pizza for 10$, they would send 1.0 DOMINOS to an address owned by the Business. On receipt of this transaction the Business would then ship the pizza. (This can be handled by an intermediate service provider). Thank you. This makes sense I am interested in launching such a service. Will try to give it some more study. |
|
|
|
|
Sorry if this is a dumb question or not really in the scope of the protocl but I had an idea a while ago that I would like to make into a reality if possible;
1) issue an asset ie: DOMINOS on the DEX. Each share would equate to one 10$ pizza voucher
2) The buyer would pay in DEX or BTC (pegged to USD) or whatever mechanism is suitable so that issuer does not lose money
3) somehow the voucher would be sent to the buyer. As I understand this is not possible in the protocol itself, but maybe the buyer would prove they have ownership of 1 DOMINOS with a key or signed message or something, and then be able to input some proof of ownership to a web-site, the voucher would then be automatically sent to an email address provided and marked as spent.
is such at thing possible? I love the idea of the decentralised exchange & if possible want to built some link to the 'real-world' on it.
|
|
|
|
The decision to take the leap to list an innovative new protocol, rather than the most currently-pumped clone coin that will leave some rich and some holding a bag, is one that I think will instill a lot of confidence in your exchange as having serious long-term motives and a vision for future. Overall a good reputation- Commendable move. |
|
|
|
Have there been any major developments or attempts to make a p2p exchange? Something to trade altcoins and be automatic like a fully function exchange yet you hold your keys until you trade?
yes. https://www.counterparty.co/about/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.0As of today you can trade BTC for XCP and back to BTC or XBTC, over the DEX whilst taking advantage of automatic escrow. Of course you can also trade any altcoin or indeed create your own assets for trading completely p2p. You can see a list of assets users have already issued for trading below. http://www.blockscan.com/asset.aspx |
|
|
|
|
buying @ 0.007, larger qty preferred.
already made some successful trades in past
escrow not a problem.
|
|
|
|
Hey guys, something weird happening on Poloniex. Every few hours come guy and sell hundreds and thousands of XCPs. He just match all buy orders from up down to 7.6. He just fixes the price for over a week on same place. It seems to me, according to this behavior, is the same guy.
He already sold tens of thousands of coins.
I don't know from where he have so many coins and why he sell so urgent as soon as price goes up a little (but still very cheap).
I have no problem with that (opportunity to new people buy with cheap prices) and by myself not hurry to sell my XCPs soon.
Maybe it will be sound paranoid, but I (and some other people) starting to think maybe he found some breach in the protocol to get free coins from nowhere or steal someone else's (similar to the white hat we saw before) and make some doubts and worries.
Is there any way to investigate this? It may be just thoughts, but maybe a bug... If this a bug, better it would fixed ASAP...
Could it be this address, 15vA2MJ4ESG3Rt1PVQ79D1LFMBBNtcSz1f? Maybe someone wants to get rid of some XCP, but the volume is too low to just put up a wall? At the current Poloniex volume, it would take a minimum of 6 hours for a 1000 XCP sell wall to get eaten through. If I wanted to quickly sell 1000 XCP on Poloniex right now without waiting 6+ hours, I would have to sell all the way down to .00711 BTC/XCP seems a more likely explanation, admin of site can check more thoroughly. |
|
|
|
That's great. Is there a way we can support them? I couldn't see a mention specifically of counterparty there, but did see that they are sponsored by mastercoin foundation? If they are working with counterparty I would be interested in donating towards any innovative development efforts |
|
|
|
Is everyone blind to the fact that we are currently paying well over 0.1btc/gh right now? or am i missing something?
doubt anyone is blind, if they are they shouldn't really be investing. This moment in time it's not good value assuming the hashrate it never increases but the whole point of this asset is you aren't paying a fixed rate per gh for eternity and to calculate as such is disingenous & would skewer the outlook greatly. All you need to do is understand (or believe) the goal is to attain and maintain a set percentage of the global hashrate. let's say 1% of the global hashrate, which is a somewhat pessimistic view & entirely achievable will net 13140 BTC per year, assuming 65% still goes towards dividends (which it wouldn't always necessarily have to) you're left with yearly dividend payment of 0.08541 between the 100,000 shares. or ~100% return by the end of the year based on current shareprice. Again this 1% is an entirely pessimistic view, and with right contracts in place and smart moves with re-investment funds, it can just as easily be 2% (or more) which is the actual figure cryptx is going for, netting a 200%+ return in a year. this is entirely feasible, not especially optimistic. No mining security is paying anywhere close to this amount today, this is really what you are basing your investment on +1 If you consider petamine a project that is likely to be around for many years to come, you need not focus on how fast you will ROI. Instead focus on how they can keep up with difficulty and maximize profits for everyone involved. I personally believe that 50% reinvest would have been a more prudent choice, but I wasn't around for that vote. exactly, the future of mining will be increasingly centralised- only those either manafacturing their own hardware or with the capital to negotiatie and contract large amounts of hardware direct from supplier, and the facilities to manage the hardware will be able to keep a foot in the door. the rest hobbyist miners will be lucky to break even and make a little bit of profit, vast majority will get stung on pre-order nonsense and end up better off having just brought btc outright. Projects such are this are only for those with long-term vision that also beleive btc will continue to be stable or rise gradually. btw-the reinvesment terms are not set in stone, they can be changed at any time, everyone involved in the project (crypxt themselves notably) would have it in their own best interests to set the percentage on a figure which would give them a decent return and at the same time keep them ahead of the difficulty curve and all shareholders can vote on this topic. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
