Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
Oooops, sorry about that = (
Well at least one liitle step closer to mass adoption =)
|
|
|
Always wonder how Decentralized Computing/Cloud storage works? is it like a read-only doc on cloud drive ?
|
|
|
I think anything can be your asset as long you own it, but the value is determined by the receiving party. Like if I receive OKB as a payment, and I deem it is value to USD$100 then it is valuable as such.
|
|
|
My vote goes to Asset Management: Trade Processing and Settlement
Since traditional trade processes within asset management (where parties trade and manage assets) can be expensive and risky, particularly when it comes to cross-border transactions. Each party in the process, such as broker, custodian, or the settlement manager, keeps their own records which create significant inefficiencies and room for error. The blockchain ledger reduces error by encrypting the records. At the same time, the ledger simplifies the process, while canceling the need for intermediaries.
|
|
|
I can't agree more with this ! and people spectate it will reach 100,000 USD by 2020
|
|
|
Stocks, bonds, ETF these are traditional assets, what other digital assets do you guys think exists and what will be the next superstar?
I will go first:
My Kmart membership card points.
|
|
|
I’ve recently learned the many advantages of cryptocurrencies and how they can revolutionize the way we use money around the world, so why are the world’s governments not adopting them to be used as a form of currency?
There are many advantages of cryptocurrencies that surpass fiat currencies that we used on a day to day basis such as better security due to blockchain technology, cryptocurrencies not really being affected by global financial events as it is a decentralized currency Why are the governments not adopting cryptocurrencies? Is it a world-wide conspiracy by the elite in order to keep in power? Or is it that the people in charge are rather ignorant of the advantages of cryptocurrencies in order to keep the current system of power?
|
|
|
|