 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
My linux host 185.150.190.19 is on block 2365695 now, and so is my home minting wallet on windows. But the 22 connections of my linux host are all back a lot of blocks, why? This is a really nerd project. "addr" : "45.129.56.151:51023",
"height" : 2362102,
"addr" : "46.0.192.98:31351",
"height" : 2362103,
"addr" : "185.79.5.221:53276",
"height" : 2363721,
"addr" : "5.39.70.87:47248",
"height" : 2362985,
"addr" : "89.24.32.31:18516",
"height" : 2277688,
"addr" : "85.19.25.38:18461",
"height" : 2360592,
"addr" : "145.239.189.106:58412",
"height" : 2364577,
"addr" : "178.223.10.23:50289",
"height" : 2364760,
"addr" : "91.250.62.26:59812",
"height" : 2364725,
"addr" : "51.148.146.204:55676",
"height" : 2364792,
"addr" : "144.76.64.49:52762",
"height" : 2364809,
"addr" : "144.76.118.44:38492",
"height" : 2364950,
"addr" : "90.188.3.212:62984",
"height" : 2363707,
"addr" : "111.201.49.182:35568",
"height" : 1758311,
"addr" : "178.221.183.154:9256",
"height" : 2364109,
"addr" : "109.10.108.52:54800",
"height" : 2365492,
"addr" : "94.25.172.40:15929",
"height" : 2364093,
"addr" : "178.223.10.23:50055",
"height" : 2365631,
"addr" : "178.223.10.23:50237",
"height" : 2365634,
"addr" : "178.223.10.23:65157",
"height" : 2365653,
"addr" : "178.223.10.23:65259",
"height" : 2359429,
"addr" : "185.68.67.37:46258",
"height" : 495577,
"addr" : "94.25.172.40:33715",
"height" : 2365678, |
|
|
|
...
But what's not that clear to me. If we have 6 servers online, why is it my local wallet has only 1 connection?
I have this behaviour too. My minting homewallet currently says "3 active connection(s) to Slimcoin network), and command getpeerinfo tells me about two connections at the same time. Yesterday evening I did "addnode 185.150.190.19" to my homewallet, and I wonder why host 185.150.190.19 does not forward some of his 22 connections (maxconnections=64) to my homewallet. Homewallet is version 0.6.0 on Windows 8.1. |
|
|
|
I deleted the last blockchain from february because of uncertenty. There are two blockchains remaining now: ftp://185.150.190.19/chain-slm.slimcoin_v0.6.0_20-12-12.tgz
ftp://185.150.190.19/chain-slm.slimcoin_v0.6.0_d21-01-17.tar Host 185.150.190.19 did not mint until now, is planned in the future. The current block is 2363595. CryptoID explorer seems to make a full blockchain syncronisation. |
|
|
|
This is the most current slim chain for linux, block 2361801 in accordance to the cryptoID explorer: ftp://185.150.190.19/chain-slm.slimcoin_v0.6.0_d21-02-23.tgz |
|
|
|
|
Elon is selling his Bitcoins ...
|
|
|
|
Is Elon Musk just losing his interest in DOGE or is he just spreading this so he could buy some more cheap doges? https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1361094185412100096 'If major Dogecoin holders sell most of their coins, it will get my full support. Too much concentration is the only real issue imo.' ... If this is really true, the Doge hype did not work out for him, very good. Now it becomes a strenuous live to him. |
|
|
|
|
NO, he is a nearly nothing, like any other leader too. The move is made by the masses.
The masses need a leader, and this they create a leader. But the leader itself is nearly nothing, a wrapper only.
|
|
|
|
|
NO, it's not him who controls the market, it's his followers. And they are the losers.
|
|
|
|
|
I believe Elon has a boyfriend or girlfriend or relative, who bought too much of Doge. That's all, this is my conspiracy.
|
|
|
|
Elon manipulates and pumping Doge which causes real people to lose money.
It went from funny to irresponsible to ridiculous very fast...
Enough is enough
One can learn from it and scrutinize, if the opposite of the recommendation is true. This applies to all other oligarchs too. It has a reason, why these guys become this rich. It's the energy of all followers. And it's the guilt of the followers too. They want to become rich, which would destroy the world, and therefore they harvest poverty. |
|
|
|
... The sad thing is that people will again be the part of the next pump even if they lose their money in the previous pump.  And even if they will win in the previos group, they will lose their money in the next group. |
|
|
|
|
In my opinion the value of all assets does not change. So if somebody lures me to become rich, I ask him who will lose. And if there is silence (mostly), the answer couldn't be more noisy. In my age I know, without an answer I will be the loser, and it would be ok. Greed has to lose. And a collaboration with thefts has to lose too.
|
|
|
|
...
I don't think so, and most people who have listened to elon for a while now actually made decent profits with doge.
He IS consistent, doge isn't a one time thing for him, he is loyal to it.
...
I did always the opposite of what "God" suggests us. Thank you Elon and followers. I have some trust into doge, but no trust into Elon. |
|
|
|
|
What's the problem? One can learn from it.
Don't trust Elon Musk.
(Don't trust superman in general)
|
|
|
|
https://prnt.sc/xz4hi4As seen here on my system same thing 97% cpu but only one on of my cores  So it's 97% out of 400% of my cpu is being used (I have 4 cores) How many connections do you serve with your configuration? I have now set maxconnections to 10, and my one core load has dropped to around 50%. The totalbytessent rises fast, so I believe the the cpu load is needed to serve the connections. In this case it's nearly impossible to serve 500 connections simultaniosly. I have a limit of 5 TByte monthly internet traffic, and try to increase it. Doge alone will fill my traffic limit quickly. Either way unless you are using 600% of your total cpu resources, You shouldn't worry, using max % of just one core is nothing. You're way below the threshold. And changing the number of clients you're connected with does indeed indicate there's more cpu load congruent with network usage. So that's normal. You do however have a bigger concern with the data cap on your service plan. That needs to be addressed sooner than later. So either connect with less nodes, or change your traffic limit. Firstly keep an eye on how much data transfer occurs over say a few days, then you can determine how much you'll need and make adjustments from there. Keep in mind every new node that might connect with you to do a full sync will probably average you at least 44 gigabytes or more a day (depending what your upload speed is). Which is also something else you should be able to limit, Rather than the number of connections but actually slow down your upload rates  My hoster wants to have 65 USD for every 5 TByte of bandwidth, 1900 USD monthly for a flat, much to high in my opinion. I'm sorry, but I have stopped the doge service. I will think about opening my home router for incoming connections, and use private computers for it. But for security reasons I have to reflect about it carefully, it will take some time. |
|
|
|
https://prnt.sc/xz4hi4As seen here on my system same thing 97% cpu but only one on of my cores So it's 97% out of 400% of my cpu is being used (I have 4 cores) How many connections do you serve with your configuration? I have now set maxconnections to 10, and my one core load has dropped to around 50%. The totalbytessent rises fast, so I believe the the cpu load is needed to serve the connections. In this case it's nearly impossible to serve 500 connections simultaniosly. I have a limit of 5 TByte monthly internet traffic, and try to increase it. Doge alone will fill my traffic limit quickly. |
|
|
|
I'm finished for this time. My host 103.243.173.214:22556 has 32 maxconnections, a response time (ping) far lower than 1 second, and uses one complete core of the cpu. I will let it untouched this way. From 29 active connections only 5 are current, the remaining has to catch up. This perhaps explains the high cpu load. My system uses a nvme ssd, this is no bottleneck, waiting time for drive access is very low.
hmm usually high cpu load is during block downloading/syncing/verifying transactions, but you are also only using one cpu (4 cores i assume?). If you have the available memory, set your `dbcache=2000` in the dogecoin.conf file. this significantly helps with syncing. and reduces usage of the storage drive, keeping more data in ram. I have configured dbcache=2048 for all testing now. Even with only 15 maxconnections I have a full load on one core: # output of top(1)
top - 06:00:14 up 48 days, 13:46, 5 users, load average: 2.27, 2.40, 2.34
Tasks: 252 total, 1 running, 251 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 9.1 us, 1.7 sy, 6.7 ni, 78.5 id, 0.4 wa, 0.0 hi, 3.7 si, 0.0 st
MiB Mem : 64225.1 total, 446.5 free, 20889.6 used, 42889.0 buff/cache
MiB Swap: 17360.0 total, 12809.9 free, 4550.1 used. 43043.0 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4164700 doge 20 0 2666100 1.2g 132444 S 98.4 1.9 11:48.79 dogecoind I have a 6 core 12 thread host. I don't want more cpu usage by one wallet daemon, so this is ok for me, more load is unwanted. My daemon mostly is some blocks behind the current block. The connected hosts are lagging too. My last block is 3589562, the current one from blockchair is 3589563. I'm nearly current, but the load stays near 100%. $ ./dogecoin-cli getpeerinfo | grep startingheight
"startingheight": 3589535,
"startingheight": 4688,
"startingheight": 13904,
"startingheight": 15676,
"startingheight": 3589458,
"startingheight": 536920,
"startingheight": 3589489,
"startingheight": 3589509,
"startingheight": 3589550,
"startingheight": 3589407,
"startingheight": 28951,
"startingheight": 4552, I have a 64 GByte host, and only 1/3 of the memory is used, the remaining is drive cache. Can this info explain the high load? totalbytessent is incredible high in comparison to totalbytesrecv. And the sent counter rises quickly, after a few minutes it's 1 GByte more. $ ./dogecoin-cli getnettotals
{
"totalbytesrecv": 8300980,
"totalbytessent": 4952289892,
"timemillis": 1612177939714,
"uploadtarget": {
"timeframe": 86400,
"target": 0,
"target_reached": false,
"serve_historical_blocks": true,
"bytes_left_in_cycle": 0,
"time_left_in_cycle": 0
}
} My host is ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS. The wallet comes from https://github.com/dogecoin/dogecoin/releases, file is dogecoin-1.14.2-x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz, md5sum is ecc01479161d3c872f0b725f184c8983. |
|
|
|
|
I'm finished for this time. My host 103.243.173.214:22556 has 32 maxconnections, a response time (ping) far lower than 1 second, and uses one complete core of the cpu. I will let it untouched this way. From 29 active connections only 5 are current, the remaining has to catch up. This perhaps explains the high cpu load. My system uses a nvme ssd, this is no bottleneck, waiting time for drive access is very low.
|
|
|
|
|
My host with 510 active connections has a response time in the magnitude order of a minute. Too high maxconnections could make it worse. I reduced it to 128 connections and observe it.
|
|
|
|
|
I have activated the fullnode, though it is about one day behind. maxconnections is 512. IP is
103.243.173.214:22556
Some competence here shall test it, thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
