Preserving wealth has never been easy because extortionists will always come for you, and they can even be government employees haha. They will demand the same thing and offer the same thing, nothing different. If you deny their offer or won't cooperate, then you can't preserve your wealth.

In the same way, when you become wealthy, the first thing you do is change your lifestyle. Now imagine you live in a neighborhood where someone is so envious of your success that they would do anything to cause you harm. Then you can't live there happily, so you have to move to a better place. There are always many wealthy communities in almost every country, so you can live with people of your own standard.

But then other problems start, like comparison, showing off, and backbiting, etc. Here, however, these happen on a much bigger level, with no limits.

Waha pr internet wagera ky masly hain kya? Like azad kashmir or us side pr kuch ilawy hain waha to ihtijaj ki waja sy yeh services bnd hai as far as I know us ky ilawa waha pr ineternet facilities to hai bro ya nhi! Kya kh rhy ap?

Baki bro yeh bi khny ki baat hi hoti hai ky bnda sirf dua hi kr skta hai ky unhy imandaar leaders mily lekin imdandari kisi kisi ky khoon my hoti hain, wo bnda jisko bs yehi padhi ho ky mera faida ho jai, mera nuqsan na ho jai bs asi bato wala bnda kbi kisi ka bhala nhi kr skta, leader wohi acha jo awam ko phly dekhy apna nafa dekhy hi na.

Bohat sy leaders duniya bhr my asy hi ay unhy yeh bilkul tension na thi ky bad my kya krain gy idr sbhi ko yehi tension hoti hai ky yeh leadership kuch dair ky liya hai to tb tk dono hatho sy jitna ho skta smait liya jai is ky ilawa kuch nhi souchty.

More than privacy, I think your word matters the most. If you say you are going to refund funds when the AML score is high, then you should not hold back, even if the authorities are pressuring you. I am not pointing fingers at anyone, just highlighting that keeping your word matters the most. But still, exchanging coins with a very high AML score means taking on more problems. It is good to accept growth instead of fearing it, but this can become a problem for the platform in the future.

Therefore, they have to set some rules for specific funds coming in. Otherwise, there will be authorities knocking on their doors haha.

He is counting every single ETF company as a single authority controlling Bitcoin, while they are just the managers managing the funds of their clients, which I think the OP has failed to understand. But his main concern could be that ETFs or these companies are all related to the stock market, the Fed, or Wall Street.

So just like gold, silver, stocks, and other commodities, Bitcoin will also be affected by any war or financial crisis because, in the beginning, the narrative that made Bitcoin popular was that it was created to survive financial crises like the one in 2008.

But now it is no different and will be affected greatly, just like fiat.

Yep, we can't get every single feature in one thing. We always have to trade off one feature for another. In this case, the usefulness is increased, while the control is still in the hands of Tether. If I remember correctly, there was another protocol that introduced the same thing on the Bitcoin blockchain.

The whole idea of using dollars on the Bitcoin blockchain is nice, but we need non-dollar based stablecoins like DAI, which unfortunately is also going to become more centralized in the future. We can still use it, but in the future we will have fewer options.

Unfortunately, this is where it is heading now because they are taking down decentralized options like instant exchanges where we don't have to register. They are the last resort. Once they start their crackdown against them, it will be almost certain that they want to control the flow through centralized platforms.

Money is power, and these governments have controlled us by controlling our money. If we start controlling our own money, then they can't force us into anything. Currently, many governments are so unfair that they are making a lot of money while keeping their middle class and poor class in the same situation. People are not able to earn more than they need for food. They are stuck and can't save enough to break the cycle.

It is not natural but intentional to control them, get their votes, and carry out corruption by taking international loans.

Well, it turned into a political post, but in short, bro, this is what is happening, and eventually they will force us to use centralized platforms only.

Yep, our balance can change our profit and loss as well. Therefore, don't think that if you can make 5% profit on $100, then why not increase the capital from $100 to $10,000 so you can make more profit. But bro, we also should not underestimate the benefit of high capital because the profit can be significant, and the loss will also be significant. But if you are really good and know everything you shared, like control over emotions, psychology, risk management, and liquidity management, etc.,

Then it is easier for a trader not to be manipulated by anything because their mind is clear of any biased opinions that can cause harm.

Their clear mind tells them what is important and what is not, and it is only possible because of knowledge of the market. Although candle analysis might not work well in crypto, especially in altcoins, it can still be really profitable too.

Cars also have variable interest rates, but I guess the majority go for fixed interest rates. Comparing this interest rate with the funding rate, which is also called an interest rate, might not be an ideal comparison. But bro, it is true that we can't expect it to be stable because funding rates can be extremely high if you are trading a coin with low liquidity or if it is highly volatile.

A trader here, oshosondy, once shared his story that he opened a trade and lost the profit because the funding rate was so high. I think he was the one who shared this story, but I am not fully sure.

Well, bro, always check the funding rates before opening a trade because you can make a good profit, but if the rate is so high that your net profit is still zero, then it is of no use.

There are some other exchanges with lower fees and lower minimum exchange amounts, but why would person X prefer this over them? Obviously, there must be some benefit, right? No KYC and no AML mean something here. If you advertise No AML and someone makes a transaction without checking their AML score, then the platform freezes their funds, saying they had a high AML score while claiming to be No AML, is that a good deal?

That's why fees and the minimum exchange amount are not the only things that matter. What matters most is the transparency of the project's team with their customers and how they manage their requests and issues. Have you read the GhostSwap story? A member lost more than 12 ETH there. Read it, and you will understand what I am saying.

To sirf abhi proposal hi dia gya hai yeh bna to nhi hai na, well it will be a great thing but then what next azad kashmir will also start their demand but that would also be a good thing lekin waha ky ilaqo my jo cheezain kuch mah sy chl rhi hai wo to khul kr yeh media show nhi kr rha, sirf social media pr hi yeh cheezain nazar a rhi hain ky interent service nhi hai or bi kai ihtijaj ky realted cheezain hai jo sirf social media pr ati hai or fr kuch hi dair my gaeb leken media koi khas baat krta nazar nhi a rha.

Ma to GB ka rahasi nhi hoon lekin yeh waha ky logo ky liya bohat badhi baat ho skti hai bs waha ky leaders iman dar hoon or jitny hi wo iman dar hongy utna hi udhr kaam hoga or tourits waly sector my saftey and security pr zyada gor dena zarori hai.

masha Allah kya baat hai g members ki yeh to bohat achi news sunai hai zain bro ap ny yeh to inho ny bohat achy pizza bny oper sy masha Allah 1 ny first or dusry ny 3rd position hasil ki or inhy bohat acha reward bi mila hia masha Allah yeh to kmal kr dia dono bndo ny. Abhi in dono ko chahiya hamain pizza party dy haha mazak sy ht kr yaar waqai badha acha result rha mery khiyal sy apni local community my aj tk yeh phli dafa howa hai ky do bndy asy win kiya hon.

Great work, guys, and keep it up ap logo ny bohat acha pizza bnaya or mujhy literally cryptoyar ka pizza badha hi acha lga or is my inki kafi mehnt lgi lekin bro hr kisi ko yeh pizza bohat acha lga more than 50 votes koi aam baat nhi hain, inko to koi na koi badge bi milna chahiya tha community ki trf sy agr moderators is cheez pr gor kr sky to.

If I have grown some confidence, then it is not really a bad thing. If we are mature and know how to control our feelings, then we can easily control our greed. But yep, it is not wrong to say it is a greed catalyst because it really is one. If we are naive enough not to control our emotions and confidence when winning consistently, then we are going to lose big in a single trade, and then regret will start.

If I am winning only $10 to $25 with $500, then I would never grow confident haha because the profit is too low. If you think you have done something big by making this profit, then you are wrong. You still have done nothing big enough to grow your confidence.

So you opened a long trade at $62k, and the market moved to $65k, but you only made a small profit because you said you chose low leverage? Bro, you missed a beautiful chance to make a good amount of money, but no one could ever be 100% sure of the move. Anyway, be happy, and never mind my comment.

Actually, I said this to confirm what you did!

Well, you were just confirming your doubt, but why did you think that from $62k the market should go down? As you said, you tried something new, which was to open a trade in the opposite direction. That means you were expecting the market to go down, so instead of opening a short trade, you went long!

In futures, I can easily pull $200 to $500 in a single month if I have $200 to gamble. But if I have to do a complete analysis instead of just gambling, then I could still pull the same result, but I would have to be more subtle. The difference is that in gambling mode, I won't care about the investment, but in analysis mode, I would make sure not to lose my capital and would strictly follow a stop loss.

Bro, it is off topic, but you can easily improve your English, at least while writing. I don't know if you write in a hurry or what, but it is not looking good!

Your example is really good though. If our profit target is very low, we won't even use a stop loss because we know we can easily preserve the capital and make an extra $10. But with a higher profit target, we would have to take bigger chances.

Bro, your points are unique and solid, but you oversimplified one thing, in entrepreneurship, you don't need the same traits as climbing a corporate ladder. It requires them without any of the structure that rewards them, so you have to perform well in your corporate job, but in your business, you have to perform better. You are working day and night, but in corporate, you are working 9 to 5.

You don't have to worry about the company's revenue or anything, the stress level is lower. But when you start your own business, you have to keep an eye on everything.

It is like having wings when you are an entrepreneur, but when you are in corporate, you can't do anything. You can't even be successful because the corporate world is different in different countries. You can't climb that ladder if your skills and experience have no value.

I bet every single FTX victim converted to cold storage after they lost their funds because they learned a lesson that they would never have learned otherwise. They did not just learn a lesson; they set an example for others to take lessons. But people are always naive. They will always do what they are told not to do in the sense of testing things for themselves.

The main issue here is that these exchanges have made the experience really convenient.

That's why people are not going for self-custodial wallets. They trade, hold, and stake on the same platform, they pay less, but they start to realize the real trade-off once their funds start getting frozen by the exchange, and then they move out.

It can't be that smooth. I expected that even before opening the site. It is not good except as a fun way to visualize the market. It can be changed into anything funny too, which would require less animation. That's how we can see less jitteriness.

I know, dear, we can't play. He mentioned if we can play a game, I said we can't play because it is not a game but a gamified visualization of the trading chart. However, with proper implementation, it could be improved for demo trading or backtesting strategies.

Ha bhai unkown sun lo yeh qurban kya kh rha hai haha.

G bro mai bi bnata tha kisi time my, maza ata tha yeh sary tools use krny ka apna hi maza tha, in ka apko real life my bi khi na khi faida ho jata hai, lekin data is important or ap jb isko community my achy sy comparison way my post kro gy to us sy members ki posts my improvement automatically ati hai, ap nhi janty lekin in reports ki waja sy indirectly you are motivating the community ku ky result dekh kr hi bnda souchta hai ky yaar mera result sai nhi aya ya sai aya hai to result bnany walo ki appreiciation to bnti hai

then again ghlti hr insan sy ho skti hai unkown ap sy phly bi tha abhi ja kr agr koi ghlti howi to no tension ap sy bi ho skti hai ap inhy personal message kr ly or baat pm my clear kr ly ky wo isko correct kr dy to ap local board waly section my post kr sky best of luck.

Checklist can fix many things, but greed is not one of them. But there are some checklists, like closing a trade at a specific profit and not thinking about what we could have made if we had not sold. That kind of checklist has to be added.

But writing rules and breaking them is normal practice for newbies. Experience teaches us a lot, but it is really expensive, and most newbies leave early without paying that expense. That's why we should keep our positions small so we can learn the same lesson by paying less.

Moving coins to Coinbase Prime does not really indicate they are selling. It could also mean they are managing their funds, but the US government has sold their seized funds before, so it is not an unreasonable concern.

They sold a fraction of what they are holding, so even if they sell, the market can easily absorb this without much trouble. The more interesting question is whether the strategic reserve policy actually holds or they are quietly changing it over time to profit themselves.