This should not only be about gambling sites but also about other platforms like exchanges, banks and everywhere you are online even if it is not about money, you still need to make sure that the emails you are receiving are actually from the platform that you registered with and not from another place. It can be a means to scam if not from the platform you registered with.
|
|
|
As far as I understand your question, you will not be able to open long positions in one direction on CEX, but it is possible to do so on DEX. For example, you can open several Long or Short positions on the same asset on the GMX exchange or on Hyperliquid.
I prefer the trading experience on those centralized exchanges than those web3 exchanges. They have limit coins which was one of the reasons I do not like web3 exchanges. I will use Bybit subaccounts and more accounts on MEXC. I noticed to switch from one account to another on MEXC is easy with fingerprint which could be what I will go for. I may later give with GMX or Hyperliquid a try but not likely. Thanks for this information.
|
|
|
...I have seen even some exchanges maybe they have corrected that you can even open position of different trades (short and long) of same pair. ..
To hold a long and short position at the same time, you need to set the hedging mode in the settings. I can't speak for all exchanges, but Binance and Bybit definitely have this feature. Screenshot from Bybit. @EL MOHA, hedge mode to open short and long position are on all derivatives exchanges that I have used before. I have used more than 10 exchanges with this feature. I think it is even the default on most exchanges but I am not sure about this second because immediately I visit a new exchange, I change everything necessary in the settings immediately but it has been long since I registered on a new exchange. Oshosondy, I remember earlier opening several long positions on Bybit at the same time with hedging mode enabled, but now I checked and it didn't work out for me.
This would have been long ago because I have been using Bybit since 3 years ago but I did not see this feature.
|
|
|
However, there’s one campaign manager I noticed who doesn’t allow that, and that’s Hhampuz. Based on my observation, if the opening is for a Sr. Member, he will only hire a Sr. Member, even if a higher-ranked member applies and agrees to a lower rate.
The OP is not talking about giving lower rank slots to higher ranked members. He is only talking about the reason higher member pay is more than lower members. There’s no general rule for signature campaigns in the forum. In fact, you won’t even find anything about signature campaigns in the official forum rules.
You're right, there are no general rules about managing a signature campaign, but the forum has guidelines for signature campaigns which can be found in the pinned topics in the Services section or you can check it here: Signature Campaign Guidelines (read this before starting or joining a campaign). But I don't know if this is still being implemented because since that guideline was posted, only a few have actually been punished or banned for not following it. I know there are some who violate it, but like others, I just let it be to avoid any issues with the said violating account. As for me, as much as possible, I avoid arguing unless I know that I am right. This is not about forum having general rules about campaigns but about campaign managers and how they want to manage their campaigns. On almost all campaigns, lower ranks are paid low than higher ranks.
|
|
|
Not all managers offer the same rate for Legendary and Hero ranks. Some managers give a higher rate for Legendary members as a way to recognize that they’ve achieved a higher rank in the forum. And also, it probably helps attract the target market when they see a Legendary member wearing the signature.
But whatever the reasons, the most important thing is the success of the campaign. I guess there’s kind of a standard rate that’s being followed. What I like about the campaigns here is that even lower ranks already earn a decent pay.
By the way, there are also campaigns where Sr. Member and above are paid the same rate, so it really depends on how the manager runs it.
I do not think this reply is necessary. i know that campaign managers paid the same rate to all their members starting from senior member but in just very few campaigns. Also did you read this: The higher the rank the larger the signature space which is one of the reasons. But legendary and hero members have the same signature space which is the reason almost all campaigns for both have the same pay.
If I said almost all l, it means not in all campaigns. So why the correction?
|
|
|
The higher the rank the larger the signature space which is one of the reasons. But legendary and hero members have the same signature space which is the reason almost all campaigns for both have the same pay.
I also noticed that heros on this forum that ranked to legendary are not increasing in quality posts performance as they are already very good if compared to when they are ranking from newbies to senior members.
A well recognized legendary on this forum is likely well recognized already when he was in hero. Some of them even have merits more than their activities before they ranked to legendary.
|
|
|
I believe this is allowed, in Bybit I have a main account and different sub accounts that are active.
Is all the extra manual 'fixing' worth it though? Maybe on larger capitals but I feel like the increased hassle (since you can't find an exchange that automates) is offputting.
There was a time I tried it and it did not work. But I tried it now with $50 to open a long position and it worked. Although I can also easily switch from one account to another on MEXC which is not also against their terms of service. It would have been better if I can have this feature on a single account just as I explained above but I have no options than to try the subaccounts. I expect people not to comment on subaccounts anymore. Just comment if you have seen what I am asking of on an exchange before. I know I can do this using subaccounts even before posting topic.
|
|
|
On the basis of AI, I took a chance at Deepseek promoting it to give me a close guess or tips on what team to win football matches yesterday and somehow it gave a good tips with statistics that gave me a chance to be rational in decision making but because of greed and the payout was quite small so I added my own guess to increase the chance of high return and it turnout that my own guess ruined the bet.
You mean that if you have followed just the DeepSeek prediction, that you would have won? This is contradictory to your topic title as if it was DeepSeek that failed the experiment for you. Or can you explain better by quoting me. If you mean that it was not the fault of DeepSeek, know that AI prediction can not still favour you as a gambler. Betting is not what is easy to win more than lose. People do lose than win.
|
|
|
I was unable not to post on this thread because I am just seeing the thread just now but I still think my post will be good as it is about speculation. Are we about to see $100K soon, like this month or next month? Or will Bitcoin get tested again and we’ll see another major dump?
This is a good question but bitcoin has been getting rejection around $95000 which has been a strong resistance. I think bitcoin may continue to get rejection but the month of May might be different as bitcoin might surpass $100000 in the month of May.
|
|
|
I will prefer to have a job if I should pick my current situation. I have my own business and I am receiving money there than the jobs that people were offering me.
But know that if a job is paying well, you can have a job and still have your own business. You can do the two together. But I can not go for underemployment.
|
|
|
I have used Binance, OKX, Bybit, Kucoin, HTX, BitMart, BitMez, Bitget, MEXC and few other exchanges before but I have not seen such feature before on exchanges.
I do not know the reason they do not have such feature that can make grid trading easier.
I can create more accounts on MEXC easily. Probably I may use that approach instead. Or go for subaccounts on other exchanges.
I noticed subaccounts on Bybit can not be used for derivative trading. Derivative trading is there but not working.
|
|
|
Assuming you open a long position with bitcoin at $90000, you will see the position as 1. Also you open bitcoin long position at $91000, you should see the position as 2.
I means same coins with 2 positions. Just as if you open bitcoin as position 1 and another coin as position 2.
On most exchanges, the bitcoin amount you used to open 1st and 2nd position will add up as just only one position.
The reason I asked this question is because I want to try grid trading and this is how it can be convenient for me on a single exchange.
|
|
|
People like excessive prediction without having any fundamental or technical analytic reason. I am expecting bitcoin not to go more than $150000 but this is from my analyses and not just prediction. Although I think slightly lower in price than that. I noticed people predict too low price for bitcoin when it is falling and higher price for it when it is rising.
|
|
|
I have not seen one, and I think gamblers don't really care about this. This is like "show me the money first" before I place my bet.  What that people care about is reputation and not any bankroll. Most gamblers even do not know what bankroll is. I came to this forum before I know anything called bankroll. Only what I know bankroll was before that is about gambling is the money that a gambler send from his account like wallet or bank account to his gambling account. It was later that I know that the total sum of the money is called the gambling site bank roll. All I care about before and till now is excellent reputation, good customer service, fast deposit and withdraw.
|
|
|
This is the stupidest prediction that I have even heard of recently. People should stop believing this people that might be bitcoin critics. I think this bitcoin analysts Mike McGlone is one of them.
We may not agree with that analysis but that won't mean labelling it the "stupidest". What if it comes to past in future? This industry is full of uncertainty, and as such we can't be too certain the unthinkable won't happen. By my assessment, and to the best of my perspicacity, I believe $10k is unrealistic a dip to get to. It won't happen, at least not in this circle. We've so many favourable news items on Bitcoin and it has just one direction to head to by that. That direction, certainly, isn't to dip. Even if the news are not favorable for now, bitcoin is never going back to $10000. Someone people call an analyst and accept should not make such a stupid prediction. All I know is that he is a critic. If bitcoin fall to $10000, he should know that he is sleeping and dreaming and not what is actually happening in real life. I did not just make this statement but from analyses I know the man make a stupid prediction which are commonly made by bitcoin critics.
|
|
|
You are obviously a fan of decentralized betting. If I should ask, from your statement does it imply that if a platform has several nodes and no central server but asks users to get verified, are they still considered as decentralized?
There should be nothing like KYC in a decentralized system but if KYC is requested for, let us say through something like voting, I do not think it is centralized. But for what purpose if they are doing something just as it is on centralized sites? They will only use the means to drive more customers away.
|
|
|
Is it mare speculation or clear expectation? Don't you see any form of incoming momentary depreciation along the line?
The market price of bitcoin can not keep climbing up all the time, there would be the time that bear market will be what they would happen and later followed by a significant bull market. As for me I still think that next year which is 2026 would be of the bear market but later the bull market will follow and later bitcoin will continue to get to ATH.
|
|
|
Bitcoin later increased above $80000 again and later increased above $90000. Bitcoin as of today increased above $94400 but it is presently at $93475 when I was about to post this. Just as we have posted before, those people should not be believed as bitcoin always disappoints them as it continues to increase than fall.
|
|
|
This is a very good prediction as I make some analyses some weeks ago that bitcoin might not go up to $170000 that I predicted before but that bitcoin will still get to ATH and probably increase to almost $140000 which some people also posted almost the same on a thread on this forum. What that is important is that bitcoin will continue to increase after a long period of time. Is this realistic? Is this a prime time to buy?
What's your thought on this?
It is realistic. If you want to go for a long term investment, you can start to DCA now. Bitcoin will likely get to over $800000 in 2035. I believe that.
|
|
|
You are correct but there are more to post to answer your question further. What do you think increases your chances of wealth?
Work towards acquiring wealth than non necessities that their price will depreciate also. As there are assets that their values are decreasing and there are assets that their value are increasing in value. Some things are not necessary and no need to purchase them. There are many of them that will have no lower value if you want to sell them.
|
|
|
|