In the long term we are talking about house edge and as long as there is a house edge the gambler is doomed to lose money. You can make a quick buck, and maybe you could make a quick buck back to back, that seems like the only possible method to make money honestly.
In a sense it is clear that no matter which casino you got to and which strategy you use as a gambler or an occasional player you're deemed indeed to lose at some point even if you probabilistically happen to win at first. The reason for this is simple - house edge.
Of course, this doesn't apply to casinos whose algorithm can be exploited and manipulated such that you always win even after considering the house edge.
what is that
a joke? or you never played dices at all?
Even with 0% house edge you will lose with martingale, on 2x payout can be 23 red easily, some players said they had even 30 red. Ok, without house edge it would be 29 red. So you would win?
I think it's impossible to get 0% house edge, every I play in dice game, it's just not probability to get green because we don't know how much lost strike every payout we play.
It seems you dont understand what I mean! I mean even if it would 0% house edge you would lose anyway, martingale is just a bad strategy
they will never not take advantage, because one of the advantages of the house edge, without that I agree the possibility to get a victory will be smaller
Show Posts
