Satoshi Bowery told you?

I've been reading through your posts and think its time to call you out on your flawed research and baseless assumptions.

Firstly, James A. Bowery is not James A. Donald, they are two VERY different people.  I know James Donald very well, though we are not friends or associates.  James Donald was not born in the US or Canada (as Wikipedia falsely claims) and he certainly has never lived in Iowa.
I know where he was born, his occupation, where he resides and can tell you with absolute certainty he is NOT James Bowery. So you are dead wrong on that assumption.

Secondly, you have linked a few words from James Donald's old webpage (which you think is James Bowery's) with Satoshi's and hey presto its a match! That's not research, its called jumping to conclusions. FWIW: My own linguistic study (performed against 18 individuals and three suspected small groups) scored James Bowery very poorly, he was one of the lowest (and Craig Wright for that matter) and yes James Donald was included in the study also.

Thirdly, you have this 'recollection' that James Bowery sent you early coins, told you how Bitcoin works and therefore he is Satoshi.
Since James Bowery has categorically denied sending you early coins and you've been unable to provide any proof so I guess we only have your word on that.

Even if you nailed Satoshi's identity (and you haven't) doxing Satoshi is a highly irresponsible act.
There's a good reason why 'Satoshi' needed to be anonymous, and why he/they need to remain anon.

I really disapprove of what you have done here, its a low act to dox anyone. If they were a threat to society or a charlatan, like Craig Wright then I'd applaud you. But James Bowery is not your 'Satoshi' and you are barking up the wrong tree at James' expense, I can only imagine you have done this to draw attention to yourself.