|
541
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 06, 2020, 08:51:54 PM
|
Many companies decide to pull out of the #MobileWorldCongress event in Barcelona due the rapid spread of the #coronavirus. There is no harm in making sure your supplies are up to date. Call it a practise drill if you prefer. Get a months's worth of basic supplies together for all pets and people in your household. Do it right now. Don't forget water. For most of the developed world's populace, water is (((their))) greatest tool of control. |
|
|
|
|
542
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 06, 2020, 08:50:19 PM
|
 There's no long term plan here, at this point even if he somehow manages to prove that he owns Satoshi's private and gpg keys, i don't see how anyone would want to support a blockchain network with an "owner". BSvers can't be that dumb, or can they He likes what Satoshi did He doesn't like what blockCore did to Satoshi 's BitCoin He might be Satoshi and keeps the trolls running So far that's cool  The issue is that BSv idiots fail to see that no one wants a "decentralized" network with an "owner". The issue is that anti-BSV idiots fail to see -- notwithstanding CSW's statement quoted above -- that BSV no more has an "owner" than does BTC. |
|
|
|
|
543
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 06, 2020, 07:02:09 PM
|
Well, I bought like 0.22025224 BTC at $9,234.41 per BTC yesterday 2/4/20 at $2,064.21 USD. Of that, there was the $30.31 USD Coinbase fee in previous amount here.
Jeepers. That's like a 1.5% fee. I might suggest you sign up for pro.coinbase.com. Instead of trading against Coinbase the company, you are trading against their other customers, with Coinbase merely serving as the marketplace. Fees there are much, much lower. Max of 0.5%, min of 0.0%. |
|
|
|
|
544
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 05, 2020, 11:25:34 PM
|
Will be fun to read the posts by r0ach and the BCH/BSV'ers.
Why conflate? I fail to understand. BTC up 5.6% in last 24 hours. This is good BCH up 14.8% in last 24 hours. This is gooderer. BSV up 9.6% in last 24 hours. This is gooder, too. edit: oh - sorry 'bout that, nutildah Correct. In the last 24 hours. Extrapolation is a dangerous beast. What makes you think that the relationship between BTC and BCH/BSV will be necessarily linear? We'll know soon enough. IMO, the best strategy is Jimbo's. Coins untouched, keep legacy coins in their legacy state (forked coins intact), cash out when the time is right. I dunno. You said it'll "be fun to read the posts by BCH/BSV'ers". I'm just trying to put the fun in your day. That's all. Though I still wonder why you conflate us with The r0ach - the miserably misguided anti-crypto-in-any-form-er, blinded by his/her flawed axioms. And no, I don't think any such price relationship will be linear. Indeed, it is demonstrably _not_. Further, in the next FOMO rush, I expect BTC to outperform BCH and BSV. (::gasp!:: What did he just type!?) Right up to the point of Blockalypse II, when all that demand will be rebuffed by BTC's latent fatal desire to be exclusionary. And all that demand will find elsewhere to go. Into the more faithful renditions of Bitcoin. Of course, if you have no solid convictions on the matter, Jimbo's approach does indeed make a lot of sense. |
|
|
|
|
546
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 05, 2020, 09:50:25 PM
|
Ultra instinct at $100k.  AYH after AYH... 350DMA still looking upside. They tried hard @ $7k to reverse the bullish momentum but failed. This thread will really be something at $100,000 brother  Will be fun to read the posts by r0ach and the BCH/BSV'ers. Why conflate? I fail to understand. BTC up 5.6% in last 24 hours. This is good BCH up 14.8% in last 24 hours. This is gooderer. BSV up 9.6% in last 24 hours. This is gooder, too. edit: oh - sorry 'bout that, nutildah |
|
|
|
|
548
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 02, 2020, 08:40:14 AM
|
Or maybe it was before your time.
Ouch!!! That's funny. Yer both relative n00bs, going by your reg date here in BTCT. That's a zinger, jbreher, even if, based on your registration date, it seems that you should know a whole hell of a lot more about the importance of bitcoin's serving as difficult to change, and one of the guilty aspects of Coinbase involved their trying to bully various aspects of bitcoin, and seemingly forgetting (at least for a while) who brought her to the dance. What's doubly funny, JJG, is that you presume to know more than do I. You, the admitted technical ignoramus. Whatevs. Wallow in yer sandbox, junior. Anyhow, some of your seeming ongoing bitterness ...
What is this bitterness of which you speak? You are but comedic relief to the background radiation one must accommodate in modern life. |
|
|
|
|
553
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: February 02, 2020, 02:27:32 AM
|
Let’s see now, off the top of my head:
A history of bad behavior, including admitting that their service providers were selling that data?
So they replaced them. Hiring a team that worked for oppressive Middle East regimes to silence dissent?
And is said team still silencing dissent in the Middle East? Holding Bcash lol hostage for three months to pump the price?
'Hostage'. You funny. Under the circumstances, waiting for demonstrated value before acking seems reasonable. A history of insider trading?
_What_ history of insider trading? 1. They allowed them to do it in the first place. Nonsense. How could Coinbase have _allowed_ some external entity to carry out some legal (albeit disfavored) activity? 2. Probably. I have no idea.
No shit. 3. Does demonstrated value require active trading on other major exchanges for 2.5 months? Very cute. We all know why CB stalled releasing the fork coins for 3 months.
Oh, we do? Why is that? 4. I guess you don’t remember Roger Ver defending their insider trading on the basis you should want more, not less insider trading. Or maybe it was before your time.
What the fuck does Ver making a personal statement about his core values have to do with Coinbse's actions? Absolutely fuck-all, that's what. |
|
|
|
|
555
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 31, 2020, 08:14:23 AM
|
Let’s see now, off the top of my head:
A history of bad behavior, including admitting that their service providers were selling that data?
So they replaced them. Hiring a team that worked for oppressive Middle East regimes to silence dissent?
And is said team still silencing dissent in the Middle East? Holding Bcash lol hostage for three months to pump the price?
'Hostage'. You funny. Under the circumstances, waiting for demonstrated value before acking seems reasonable. A history of insider trading?
_What_ history of insider trading? |
|
|
|
|
557
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 31, 2020, 07:15:40 AM
|
Do we really want to send them to coinbase? I understood they've been naughty in assisting agressive nutrino chainalyasis/analytic tactics.
Genuinely curious. What _exactly_ do you think they are doing to aid chainalysis? Divulging private customer data? Yes Perhaps. Examples would be helpful. Other than that required by law, of course. |
|
|
|
|
558
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 31, 2020, 07:13:14 AM
|
Do we really want to send them to coinbase? I understood they've been naughty in assisting agressive nutrino chainalyasis/analytic tactics.
Genuinely curious. What _exactly_ do you think they are doing to aid chainalysis? Divulging private customer data? I'm not accusing them of anything illegal however since Coinbase acquired Neutrino, now they have the largest on ramp and customer base with chainalysis rolled together. Not only is it a honeypot for leaks, its recreating the same privacy invasive, centralized practices familiar in today's banking. While understanding the merits of such, I prefer to support smaller privacy focused on ramps in efforts to avoid ultimately enslaving the population with an 'all seeing' Gov. Bitcoin. To answer your question directly, Coinbase is consolidating power to break and prevent privacy in Bitcoin. #deletecoinbase So you have no proof that they are using such data to nefarious ends? That's certainly what it appears you are saying. Your closing statement is topologically identical to 'Google/Amazon/Facebook is consolidating power to break and prevent privacy in all aspects of life'. Which could be a true statement, but I bet there is not one in a hundred persons reading this that does not deal with at least one of those organizations from time to time. You' are correct, no proofs from me. I'm unable to afford the luxury or patience to await proof so I must rely on intuition, experience and history (Sometimes referred to as logic) If that condemns me to your special snowflake pile, oh well, I guess I'll have to live with that  Nope: here's my reply to P_Shep wherein I used that specific terminology: So, no offense taken, and no defense presented. Unless you consider trying to nail down wishy-washy accusations to concrete statements of facts as 'defense'. In which case, I'll just put you in the 'special snowflake' pile. Which would make me sad. I've not previously thought of you as such. Things had gotten out of hand, with my genuine curiosity being presented as it was some sort of defense of nefarious actors - essentially accusing me of malfeasance. My use of the term was a perhaps-too-dramatic way to point out that I did nothing of the sort. Unless I missed it, P_Shep has not responded. Which I take as a sign that s/he realizes the characterization was unfair. Tacitly admitting such, no special pile for P_Shep either. As a society we've already given our private lives to Facebook, our data to Google and our shopping habits to Amazon. I'm guilty but unprepared to drive the final nail into the coffin relinquishing our financial privacy simply because I was duped into the previous.
I'm not sure what point you'd like to make with your closing statement. Are you saying that since we've already given some of our information to these corps, giving the rest shouldn't be a problem? Perhaps until proven otherwise?
I guess I was just saying that everything comes with some sort of tradeoffs. On the net -- what with no proof of malfeasance on Coinbase's part -- they're still the exchange that I feel best about dealing with. Even more so since the only alternative given in response to my suggestion of others to look into hit a brick wall of data collection right off the bat. |
|
|
|
|
559
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 29, 2020, 10:07:29 PM
|
Do we really want to send them to coinbase? I understood they've been naughty in assisting agressive nutrino chainalyasis/analytic tactics.
Genuinely curious. What _exactly_ do you think they are doing to aid chainalysis? Divulging private customer data?They divulged mine. Ouch. Which data? That required by the jurisdiction in which you are domiciled? Or something actually nefarious? |
|
|
|
|
560
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
|
on: January 29, 2020, 10:05:47 PM
|
Bittrex hasn't fucked me...yet
Bittrex has been OK for me for trading. For getting value out.... not so much. do tell I just did. They'll do it. Fairly reliably. But only for trivial amounts. Unless they've had a recent change of policy.
Edit: Just went to check. Yes, they have had a change of policy. At least in terms of data I need to divulge in order to use the site:  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
