Your argument makes no sense at all.  There are lots of places you can buy goods/services with bitcoins.

Good questions. I'm curious to see what others here think...

So aside from the hundreds of listed places you need some more?

It could work, maybe. If merchants saw a return on their ad investment in the form of real paying customers then it could work very well in fact. But forming a new and viable social network is a tough proposition.

Scusa, non so se sia rivolto a me, ma faccio notare che ho aspettato per giudicare la singola persona... in piu' di un post ha voluto  prendere in causa la mia nazione di residenza e non credo sia una gran bella cosa per me e come per molti altri italiani che frequentano il forum. A mio parere avresti dovuto intervenire in protezione di tutti noi e non della mia presa di postizione per "difendere" e "difenderci". Se quello che pensano di noi fuori dall'Italia è quello che pensa il Sig. Michele1940 credo che il mio intervento è giustificato.
Detto questo passo e chiudo, visto che oltre ad essere offtopic non c'è più interesse a suguire questa storia. Grazie.

I'm not sure a Bitcoin focused social network would be viable at this point simply because the economy is too small. At the same time though, I think throwing someone to the forums here could be a bit daunting as a first introduction to bitcoin.

My advice is focus on getting merchants involved in the economy: formal brick and mortar merchants, internet merchants, mom and pop merchants, tabletop individual merchants, everyone selling something. Develop a pitch that explain what bitcoin is and how it could benefit them. Focus on benefit of bitcoin while not totally trashing the dollar since that might make you come off as loony.  Remember that every merchant that comes on board adds legitimacy to the currency and will serve to inspire consumer confidence.  Remember that the best way to convince a merchant is to show results. So offer your own goods and services for btc and show them the results YOU get and how YOU'VE invested in the currency.

Talk to friends and family about bitcoin, get them involved, evangelize a bit. Always focus on why it's a better alternative to their fiat even if you don't go into exactly what fiat is and why it's bad (many people don't care. They just know money works).

Eventually, you'll see the economy start to grow and you'll be able to buy more and more of your own needs in pure BTC with no need for conversion at all. At some point, we'll reach a tipping point and the economy will flourish.

CAN GOLD SURVIVE WITHOUT FIAT CURRENCY ?

Mantenete la calma
Se il progetto non vi interessa, o non vi piace ... potete passare oltre.
Se pensate che sia dannoso e/o volete criticarlo ... fatelo!
Ma ci sono modi e modi

Evitate le frecciatine personali. Se attaccate la persona e non l'idea fallite in partenza.

One important distinction to keep in mind between bitcoin and fiat is that the bitcoin economy is evolving naturally while the fiat economy is government mandated. One reason the dollar enjoys such wide acceptance is because it's a government 'backed' currency while bitcoin isn't.

I don't think we have to sit around and post good deeds on the forum all day while we wait for the economy to expand. I think we all need to be active in the community, talking to friends about the currency, introducing it to merchants, etc. Unlike the dollar, it's not a government or regulation that's going to cause acceptance of bitcoin, it's going to be user advocacy and natural currency evolution. That takes time but it's not impossible.

Mining is not the only way to get bitcoins. It's not even the easiest or most profitable way. Direct trading (buying and selling) in bitcoins does not need to involve fiat in any way. If fiat went away tomorrow, I could still pay you for your product and service with bitcoins just as I could in gold.

In my mind, bitcoins are linked to fiat only for convenience. As the economy grows, the need to convert between bitcoin and fiat will lessen until, at some point, we will be able to do most business without any reliance on fiat.

Rage

Provocation again, just for discussion :

Even if a large number of merchants would adopt btc as a form of payment ( finding it convenient according to your article ), they still will need a way to change btc into real cash. Unless, of course, the chain does not stop here and they would be able to buy from their suppliers paying with btc, go shopping for their personal needs and pay with btc and so on….
At present, btc move from the exchange market to people who buys them. From these people could move to merchants , providing there would be enough to notice this movement which, at present , is not the case, Than from merchants btc can only move back to the exchange market.
Thus for merchants adopting btc as a form of payment , ( aside from the advantages you have illustrated in this article ) could be considered as a form of investment, a speculation if you like.
This tends to limit the number of merchants interested in btc for obvious reason.
It is my opinion that , in order to boost btc economy, the final place where btc have a real tangible value, cannot be the exchange market alone.
There is nothing wrong in trying to make some extra money in speculation, but this bounds btc potential.
For example e-commerce, would be advantaged from adopting btc as a form of payment. Once the transactions are made, we will have these e-merchants loading up with btc and while they will unload their available stock of goods. Than, what ? They have to go to the exchange market and buy back fiat money in order to fill up theirs werehosues.
If btc economy is confined into this boundaries, it is very unlikely that we would see it booming up like many are expecting.
The underling concept of btc ( being a currency that allows to avoid double spending on transactions cutting of all the middle man ) remains intact even inside the boundaries I have outlined above. Merchants would have benefit from a cost free transaction on theirs sales even if they would have to buy back real cash at the end of the game.

this has nothing to do with mining at all

once we have enough people accepting bitcoins, we have complete economic cycles in btc, wherein merchant accepts btc, then pays his supplier in btc, the supplier pays his supplier in btc, they pay their employees in btc, the employees use btc to buy stuff they need, etc.

there will still have to be some exchange into fiat for the purposes of tax payments - but that's a separate issue.

1. What are you talking about?

2. Even if what you were saying made sense, not everyone who uses Bitcoin is a conspiracy theorist who is convinced that all currencies besides Bitcoin must be brought down and/or are going to crash to nothing. I highly doubt USD is going to disappear, no matter how successful Bitcoin gets. USD and Bitcoin both have their own benefits and negatives.

Delineando per sommi capi un progetto fumoso, accennando a problemi di sicurezza (quali? da parte di chi? riguardo a cosa?) che rende impossibile spiegare quale sia questo fantomatico progetto ma di cui mi pare di capire abbia a che vedere l'universo complottista di cui prima.
Segreti, diffidenze, strumentalizzazione del bitcoin, protagonismi e, lasciamelo dire, ciarpame complottista sono tutti argomenti che possono ledere l'immagine del bitcoin di cui al momento si vuole dare l'idea di uno strumento valido, sicuro, semplice da usare e a prova di ingerenze governative.

Hai un progetto che vorresti condividere per consigli o collaborazione? Esponilo serenamente, con traspearenza e avrai quelo che vuoi; il bitcoin non è ancora illegale e non lo sarà, quantomeno nell'immediato futuro, quindi non vedo il motivo di comportarsi altrimenti. Sei venuto qui per fare proselitismo? Credo proprio tu abbia sbagliato forum.