I can tell you how many shares I have. I can send you a PM.

burger: What specifically are you missing?

I need some help here  anti virus seems to be detecting libpdcurses.dll as a key logger is this a false positive as its also been reported elsewhere on ltc forums that its a keylogger and i goggled this and also thrown up a zillion pages for been a keylogger too

I'm using cgminer on Linux for the particular machine I'm discussing here. It had one 5870 card in it and I was getting ~430Mh/s out of it. Not too bad.

I happened to get my hands on another 5870 so I thought I'd pop that in too. I have both GPUs turning up in cgminer (after a little trouble, but 'aticonfig -f --adapter=all --initial' worked wonders.

I have cgminer 2.8.7 (same behavior with 2.8.5), AMD SDK 2.7 and Catalyst 12.10.

If I only enable one GPU, I get the hashrate as before. If I enable both GPUs, the first GPUs hashrate plummets. Net result is I'm still only getting the same hashrate but now it's 'using' both GPUs.

e.g.
GPU 0:  ~400Mh
GPU 1:  OFF

to

GPU 0:   ~100Mh
GPU 1:   ~300Mh

Anyone else had this problem? It's really frustrating. I've tried an older AMD SDK (2.5) but even with reboots, driver reinstallation and cgminer recompilation it simply makes cgminer segfault on startup.

Any hints would be really appreciated.

EDIT: I realized I left out some information that might help.

I am using 'phatk' kernel, worksize 256, vectors 2 and the variables:

export DISPLAY=:0
export GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS=1

are set before cgminer runs. CPU usage seems high though (Xorg is the top), which is concerning. The CPU in the system is an AMD FX 4170 (4.2Ghz) quad core.

I am going on a holiday to Scottland,
I will be gone from today until Friday, which means I will have limited to no internet.
If I am not answering your pms etc, it's probably the case that I don't have internet.
So if you could be so kind to link to this if you see anyone asking for me
Thanks everyone!
//DeaDTerra

Update

We are still waiting for the payment and the shareholders' information from GLBSE. It seems that it hasn't made any further payments after the first two. This is the address after the payment of 5443BTC, and the coins haven't been sent anywhere else yet:

http://blockchain.info/address/17pzgcf1v7zwvQczw1WE3sv2u8LZtub2Kz

The probability, we believe, that they refuse to pay and recover the shareholders' share numbers, is low. But we have to be more active pursuing the direct answer.

A letter to the board members has also been sent.

Best regards,

friedcat

They are trading okay no massive amounts of profit.
The arb bot has hit the MTGox withdraw roof hence the profit is slowing down as we can't move the capital.
I am considering doing a payout of the 400 BTC we have for now,
What's you guys opinions on that?
//DeaDTerra

From lack of players the server was shut down.  my friend said he did not want to work on something that people would not use.

Yes, I have got 90% of my BTC back.

No, the owner of this thread is probably a scammer.

I will spread it out across the margin bots and arbitrage bot until we reach a more substantial amount.
//DeaDTerra

Nefario is a bald Irish dwarf cunt.

Might be nice to just hit reply & send on those claims you have received so far just for confirmation, please.

email is not a guaranteed delivery mechanism.

Well, I had my BTC claim paid today to the claim address, in the full about, a little under 3 hours ago.

I had to look twice to believe it.  I never submitted the "AML" identity data, just the account info and a bitcoin "pay to" address.

Anyone else?