Dispute it all you want.

Risto is the brand identity of Monero.


Risto - Monero

Monero- Risto




~BCX~

@Mr. Smooth



Risto IS MONERO. He is the undisputed face, name and King of Monero.

There's no getting away from that.



~BCX~

John Connor has found quite a few exploits in Monero ahead of it's ICO.

Is this a real concern?

Should I not invest in this coin?


~BCX~

Hey I'm not in this fight, just an observer.

Apparently there's a guy John Connor that has proven several ZD exploits.

I was just trying to find out why Anonymint was so butthurt.

It looks like Smooth roughed him up for no reason.

Bummer.


~BCX~

@Mr. Smooth


You're an extra special kind of stupid aren't you?

John Connor is the one with exploits, not me.

But can you answer why Reptile King of Monero didn't have enough faith in you to risk 500 BTC or why he openly admitted that exploits existed or why did he pay Anonymint if it was all bullshit.

Are you still that hurt and in denial that Reptile didn't have faith in you?

Anywayz I don't have a dog in the fight and could care less as I'm passing up any XMR ICO due to it's sitting duck status.


But you might not want to make John Connor angry because you might be wrong yet again.



~BCX~

Apparently he did.

The thread was trashed.

You got caught spamming, quit acting like you didn't.

You should lock this thread or continue to be humiliated.


~BCX~

@Mr. Smooth


Dude,

C'mon I'm only posting what I heard. Don't shoot the messenger.

It's not my fault Reptile King of Monero was punked beyond belief.

If I also remember right none of Monero's finest including you had the balls to take this person's 500 BTC challenge up.

I think the exploit person offered for each side to move 500 BTC in to the possession of a neutral trusted escrow and if they couldn't pull off said exploit

in clear decisive fashion, that Reptile King of Monero would keep the whole sum.


Apparently Reptile didn't have as much faith in you as you thought because he declined.

Fact is Anonymint was paid, Reptile admitted defeat in the Monero forum and exploits still exist in Monero.

Not my fault and I wish you the best of luck in the future.


Again, I would think twice before pushing John Connor.

The chances are, you're wrong again.


~BCX~

Looks like it's time for a repost.



~BCX~

Well long before John Connor came along with what I do not doubt is another list of deficiencies in Monero

there was a person in early 2014 that found some serious flaws in the ripped off bytecoin code that was the basis for Monero.

If memory serves me correct, this person was laughed at by the Monero devs because the hashrate needed to pull off the attack was massive, actually more than a couple of the largest altcoin pools combined.

Even after Anonymint confirmed the exploit as real, they took solace in the hashrate to protect them.

I would have loved to seen the look on the faces of Reptile, Herpetila, or whatever the King of Monero name is when strange activity starting happening in the XMR blockchain like inconsistent block generation times, massive surges of hashrate and finally the beginning formation of a side chain.

Amazingly again if memory serves me right the only thing asked for by the person who's name I can't remember was for Reptile King of Monero to acknowledge the exploit as real.

Reptile wisely did do so in order his shitcoin would live another to see another day. Additionally I heard it said that the only payment requested was that Anonymint be paid his promised BTC.

A 50 BTC payment by Reptile was refused by the person.

Of course all of this is second hand and I have no first hand knowledge.


So given exploits have been known for a while, I wouldn't test John Connor if I were you guys.

It would suck to be wrong, again.


~BCX~

@Smooth


Dude give it up already.

Equamobi was spot on above.

You were using the lock, post, lock, bump, delete for no other purpose than to spam a thread you linked to in another sub-form.

You were trying to promote spam another thread that didn't belong in the main forum.

You got caught, deal with it.


~BCX~






added: By reposting the deleted spam thread from web-cache you are effectively again spamming the thread again that was deleted by the Global Moderator Grue.

Are you trying to get banned?

The user Smooth is promoting a thread moved to the Altcoin ANN section by creating a new locked thread in the Alt Discussion with a link to the one in the ANN section.

He bumps locks, bumps locks, delete post, locks....


This is a form of spamming when you promote a coin and artificially keep it to the top by bump and locking.


Thread in question

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1472763.0



~BCX~

I think I'm going to steer clear of this given the devs have known about fatal flaws for two years and have done nothing to fix it.

Thanks for the info.


~BCX~

Oh man, ZeroDay and they're using ring sigs? Why, that's just plain stupid especially if they've known about it for two years.


How did they find this out?


~BCX~

Yes I misunderstood. English is not my first language so sometimes I miss the intended meaning.

I thought you were saying that the people mentioned above were causing "Fear" in the coin.

I read in some old threads that some users can cause a coin to behave badly and I thought you were saying that these two were those kind of people.

Is this a fear you have of the forum people above.



~BCX~

I wouldn't be so sure about that if I were you.


Didn't Anonymint or someone find a flaw in the code that allowed a person with sufficient hash power to exploit the "untraceable part"


~BCX~

Ok someone help a newbie out.


How in the hell can this guy Roach and Spoetnik hurt a coin?

Fear? How do you scare a coin?

Enlighten me, I find this subject interesting.


~BCX~

I think Risto's final claim was

"there was nothing was wrong with Monrero. It was just coded so bad it it imploded spontaneously"


~BCX~

Development halted? When did it ever start?

I haven't looked at this coin since early 2014 and a lot of the same flaws that were there in the beginning are still there.

I'm guessing Anonymint didn't hold Smooth's hand tight enough.

Perhaps that's why Smooth destroyed Anonymint's reputation.


~BCX~

 Spoetnik and Roach scary LOL

Don't know Roach but Spoetnik just calls it as it is.



~BCX~

What's your point?

I once donated to the forum back when BTC was sub $1.00 because I needed the hard drive for a machine I was building and couldn't find a USB LOL

Could have easily had VIP account but saw no need for it at the time.

I don't have a problem with how the funds are being used.

If you haven't donated you really don't have any reason to be concerned.



~BCX~