@ NotFuzzyWarm,
I'm new to solomining, and I just made a google-search for a btc solomining pool. Didn't check out this forum or ck solo pool thread before after I saw my miner stated foundblocks. The miner appear strange, now for example it says that it found 15 blocks... So I guess the miner itself is no good, or I've been misunderstanding the FoundBlocks field under Miner Status - Summary.
Do you have a suggestion for another solo mining pool that is good?

Best regards,
Øyvind Kordal

Gold gilt and/or custom boxes, tins, or other special features are doable, but would raise the cost per deck.

The court verdict for SBF has already been made, and the nuances of American justice are of no interest to most readers.
Am I the only one who wonders what will happen to the Gary Potter fan(Caroline Ellison) and other participants in the fraudulent scheme, or will SBF be responsible for everything alone?

What an awesome story? 
https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/ftx-fraud-sam-bankman-fried-ex-caroline-ellison-testimony-alameda-research-ceo-13754095.html

It's funny some of you still think paypal penny is going to come through... the guy owes well over 100k in loans and gold... if these coins are made before others are made whole it would be ridiculous!

they are working but im only getting 20 TH/s with three of them going. I was getting upwards of 40 with the setup that was on there prior to my breaking it. and yes i live in central washington where the electricity is 2.8 cents/kwh.

UPDATE:

well i effed around with overclocking and burned out a couple of my power supplies. now i only have one of my miners running but its getting a good hashrate considering how old it is. .

i just did the bare minimum configuration according to that guide. fingers crossed

Our new branded products sourced from clearance, returns and insurance write-offs.

Channel closing transactions are usually beyond the user's control in mobile LN wallets. So, it's impossible to initiate RBF.

For CPFP, you must control one of the receiving addresses. But Blitz wallet is based on BreezSDK/Greenlight. In this architecture, the addresses which receive the outputs of channel closing transactions are not controlled by users. The user whose channel is closed must order a "refund" after the closure. Thus, CPFP is impossible, too.

A TX accelerator may help. But one needs to know the TXID for it. And wallets may provide users with wrong TXIDs. At least, Green wallet, after the closure of my channel, gave me the TXID which cannot be found in mempool.space. I knew the TX which had opened the channel, so I managed to find the actual closing TX. But it was possible only because I opened the channel myself. Usually such wallets (Green, Relai, Blitz etc) open the channels when users top-up their wallets via LN invoices. In this case, users don't know the actual TXID of their opening transaction, and it may be hard to allocate the closing one.

A user of Blitz wallet shared how after closing the channel to the LSP, the balance of his wallet became zero. It turned out that the closing transaction was broadcasted to the network with a fee of 2 sat/vB and was subsequently dropped from the provider's mempool. Now the provider (and consequently, the wallet application) cannot see the funds either on the Lightning Network or on the base layer, indicating that they simply don't exist.

Of course, if the mempool ever clears, the provider will eventually see the transaction, and it will appear in the wallet. Nevertheless, this story suggests that calling such storage non-custodial when you don't control the fee isn't entirely accurate. Due to incorrectly set fees by the application, you could lose access to your funds for a long time.

There's no need to send Bitcoin to the old address. Bitcoin can be moved without any of the Forks replaying the transaction.

My guess is that you are just unlucky or you break them intentionally to complain about it on Bitcointalk.

Am I the only one here who hasn't experienced any devastating issues with the hardware wallets I own? My Nano S is still working fine. I am talking about the physical device itself, before anyone mentions the data leaks. One thing I have noticed is that LL isn't displaying the correct balance for my crypto anymore, but that's because I haven't updated it in months, ever since I first heard about the Ledger Recover vulnerability.

My Trezor One is also working as it should. My only complain is the weird mouse issue that prevents me to work the Trezor Suite with my mouse connected to my laptop. But I am sure it's a compatibility issue with this mouse model. I am also not a fan of the small characters on the screen when confirming transaction data.

I am planning to add a third device to my personal portfolio soon - a signing device.

From all hardware wallets I heard minimal complains for Trezor devices, only issue I have with them is short USB cable.

Why didn't you talk with Keystone support?
They should send you refund or new Keystone3 device.

This server may be compromised at present. Do not blindly trust downloads - always verify both the SHA256 hash and the OpenPGP signatures match. Luke Dashjr's OpenPGP key is likely to be compromised, so his signatures have been removed and replaced with other developers' signatures. There is no evidence of a tampered download ever having been offered, but if you have downloaded Bitcoin Knots after 2022 December 1st, it is recommended you re-verify the files you previously downloaded to be sure.