With the crackdown on Polymarket in different countries, Meta's prediction market would outshine the former if they get gambling licences from different countries. Polymarket is claiming not to be a gambling platform, so they don't need licences. This is the reason why many countries are blocking them from operating in their jurisdiction.

Assuming that, because Mark Zuckerberg is rich, his prediction platform would offer generous bonuses is wrong. It is a business designed to make profit and not a charitable organisation.

Found a really good infographics that could help any "Bitcoin destroy the environment" people to understand what's really going on.

Apparently most of Bitcoin's energy is coming from renewable and environment friendly sustainable source of energy whereas AI systems is nowhere near that.

A check mate for the fudders who keep regurgitating the same thing over and over again spreading false information.

This is true, some casino also suggest using VPN just for the sake of claiming these bonuses if its not available to you but I do preferred changing game provider instead just like yours to avoid potential conflict in case I manage to hit max win from those free spins. lol

Anyway, it’s nice to see there’s no max win limit on the free spin which most of the free spin bonus nowadays especially new casino always have a max win limit.

Access to Rizzy is restricted to individuals who meet all of the following criteria. Players who do not meet these requirements must not register or use the platform.

You must be at least 18 years of age, or the legal gambling age in your jurisdiction if higher.
You must be located in a jurisdiction where online gambling is legally permitted.
You must not be a current employee, contractor, or immediate family member of Rizzy or its affiliated entities.
Only one account is permitted per person, household, IP address, and device.
You must not have previously been excluded or self-excluded from Rizzy.
Rizzy reserves the right to verify eligibility at any time. Accounts found to be in breach of eligibility rules will be suspended and any balances may be forfeited pending investigation.

🇫🇷 🇪🇸 France World Cup Promo!

Back France to win & increase your profit by 150% if Mbappe scores twice!

Issued as a freebet up to $1000 per user

Will the dictator score twice?



https://rainbet.com/sportsbook/soccer/international/world-cup/france-spain-2654440796627017743

I agree that announcement of issues need to be made on different media channels of the company, like email updates to registered users, posts on social media like X platform. Because this will help their users more likely receive the notification and can more likely know about the existing issues. There is no reason to hide it as users only or mostly complain if they made deposit or withdrawal and things did not go well.

In contrast if the issues are announced widely on different channels by the casino, and users know about that, they will not make deposit and withdrawal until there is another announcement from the company that issue was already solved.

This prevention can be helpful for the casino reputation too.

If they are not generating enough discretionary income to be able to buy bitcoin weekly then they can still buy however w,y they can, there is no mandate that a person must bey in a set period of time, personally I would say that if a person can't handle having to buy weekly or monthly they should just stick to buying when they have the discretionary income to buy with available to them, there is no reason to try to keep to s routine if availablity of your discretionary income won't allow it.
Having a routine is nice but if you can't manage it then buy whenever you can, having the discretionary income is what matters, when you buy depends on that.

There is no confirmation yet, so unless it becomes official, I would not believe it. The current rumor is that he could sign with the Cavs, but like I said, we should wait for an official announcement. Whatever happens, LeBron is no longer the type of superstar who can carry a team to a championship by himself, so this news is not as relevant as it would have been years ago. At this point, the bigger question is probably where he will finish his career and eventually retire.

You have to read better.

Odohu said 30%of income, which is different from 30% of discretionary income.

Those formulas are different, so you have to make sure that you know what you are reading so that you are talking about the same thing.

A person who is able to invest 33% of his income into bitcoin consistently would have had invested 1 year of his income into bitcoin in 3 years.  That is not easy to achieve for a lot of people, even though it is possible to do depending on a persons income, and also depending on other resources that he might have.

Bam Adebayo and Tyler Herro got into a physical altercation in Las Vegas on Friday. Apparently Adebayo struck Herro. No word yet on if that will lead to suspensions or not. Safe to say these now ex-teammates must have a little bit of drama going on behind the scenes to go at it like this.

I checked the bonus page & ToS. I wanted to ask support as well, but I had other things to do, and I forgot about it... in any case, bonus terms should be visible to all of us, without asking support.

And I can afford to make a mistake, but I don't wish to... I was not the player who read bonus requirements, but some casinos introduced unfair terms, and I don't wish to discover it after I make a deposit.

As I said, Rizzy needs to do something about it...

France proposed a strategic $BTC reserve bill to acquire 2% of Bitcoin’s total supply.



https://x.com/i/status/2075141125757878276

The establishment of a strategic Bitcoin reserve in France would be yet another step towards the institutional acceptance of this cryptocurrency. The suggestion of allocating 2% of the total available Bitcoin indicates how rare this crypto asset really is. While it would take time for the bill to come into effect, the fact that there is already such an idea proves that certain politicians are starting to see Bitcoin as a good reserve asset, and not only a speculative one.

It does seem like LeBron is leaving the door open for a return to Cleveland but I think that is only if he can’t make something better work somewhere else. It’s a good fallback story. I have heard he is seriously considering the 76ers now. Rumors are that he wants to see a Harden for Kyrie trade before going to Cleveland and if that doesn’t materialize, it could be the 76ers. The Warriors situation doesn’t seem to be working out as they have failed to trade for Anthony Davis and I’m not sure LeBron or Miami wants to see a reunion there…

So I think if we don’t see AD to the Warriors or Kyrie to the Cavs, we may see a superteam in Philly.

Oh daaang. Is this actually true? I was reading news from TZ and saw this mentioned.


It would be epic if so, and if they actually sign him later down the line. I can't imagine how expensive his fees are lol. but it would certainly generate yuge buzz.

Well good luck to duelbits.  

I have a bit of a different opinion on that than most forum members.

My take is that in general he's not completely incorrect. If Bitcoin was conceived from the start with a tail emission defined in the code, then I think this strategy would have been at least as good as the 21 million limit.

We would have one discussion less, the fee market issue, and we would have more margin to play around with block sizes as the fee market wouldn't be that important.

However, I oppose a change, at least if the security budget doesn't get dramatically lower. We don't know how the fee dynamics will play out. And the cost and risk of a hard fork would be probably huge.

The current Bitcoin Dominance also seems to confirm that people believe in Bitcoin's model more than in Monero's or Dogecoin's (to mention only decentralized altcoins). We can say: The market has decided, 21 millions and halving until 2140 are fine.

And of course any statement from a guy who created a premined coin who has his own business goals has to be taken with a huge rock of salt

PS: 4% per year is too much, imo. I would go for 1-2%.

I will never be in support of a gambling ban all because of related issues with gambler protection, every Gambler should be able to protect himself from engaging in abnormal gambling behavior he would have choose to go for when gambling, one circulation in this manner is being introduced, if I may go with my opinion, I will suggest that both should not be necessary for us to consider except we choose on either for ourselves and not by any regulatory authority.

TBH, best bet is on website only. I would consider myself active on X and even had notification ON for lucky at one point. I've never seen challenge posts during that time. Most likely they post about it rarely.

Emails are also a hit or miss because when I searched, I only got 3 emails about challenges with one of them because it hasn't been claimed for some time so lucky bumped the reward. 

I think it can still work and is very much applicable. It all depends on your level of aggressiveness or what you define as aggressiveness. I feel an investor can get on a moderate level of aggressiveness while still building his back up funds simultaneously without putting his investment at risk.

Take for instance, a new investor who allocates $100 to his investment and maybe $50 to his back up funds weekly, and then, maybe he gets some extra income or a bonus pay or wins a jackpot or sometimes that gave him extra cash, he can decide to buy more BTC in coming weeks maybe by increasing his accumulation amount from $100 to $150-200, while also slightly increasing the back up funds allocation maybe from $50 to $60-70 or thereabout. In some other weeks, he can decide to increase the back up funds allocation slightly higher while maintaining the already effected change of the accumulation amount and vise versa.

I believe an investor can still be slightly aggressive with buying Bitcoin while still trying to completely build a strong back up funds alongside. What really matters is your structure of aggressiveness. If you ever do it and totally ignoring the back up funds, then your investment will be put to a great risk, but if everything is well arranged, then, there could be some level of controlled aggressiveness while also building your back up funds.

I strongly disbelieve that those who were put in jail for gambling and later get released, they will be released as better people. I think there is a high chance, that while being in prison those gamblers will only think how to revenge government and hack law system. Surrounding of criminals will change that gamblers state of mind and in the end gambler will be transformed into criminal-gambler.

unless if you are doing it for the fun of it, I will not advise anybody to go into trading or investing in a coin they are not comfortable with. What this crypto market is all about aside from making money is also building a confidence and comfort around it, without being over comfortable though. Moderating every part of it very important for every trader and investor. Learn, because acquiring knowledge in crypto world is the key to success, it is not gambling but a knowledge driven economy, so you are encouraged to learn and be informed so you can make money and make progress.

I'm surprised that the signature campaign ended, but it's been a good run. They have firmly established their presence and reputation here. I'm sure they will be back, of course, with the same manager.
A casino with a lot of perks and giveaways needs a campaign for its promotion. They should maintain their support here, so in case there are issues that pop up in the scam section, they can address them here.