2701
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Servers for btc
|
on: February 17, 2011, 03:46:32 AM
|
This is why you should invest in the bitcoin credit report agency . Actually yes, if just a man had a profile on this system, he'd have made a deposit. After defaulting on his agreement he'd lose that deposit, the funds for the trade would have been in escrow and would be safe. On top of that just a mans credit rating would take a hit, and his default would permanently be on his record for anyone doing future dealings with him. And because his profile is tied not just to his facebook profile, but that of his friends he can't just come back with a new accout (he could but his credit rating for a newly created accout would be so low no one would trust him).
|
|
|
2702
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: inheriting bitcoins
|
on: February 17, 2011, 03:22:07 AM
|
Clearly we need a bitcoin will application, such that if the person dies, or they haven't logged into their account for..... a year then an email with details the account will be sent to a pre-designated address along with an explanation.
Could set it up to send an email to the owners account before doing this, just to try and get some response from them, making sure they're not dead.
|
|
|
2705
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Servers for btc
|
on: February 17, 2011, 01:57:51 AM
|
I really do think the guy lost his job. He was probably an admin at a hosting company and thought he could make some btc on servers that were not being used (without telling his boss). This is why I was able to get a dedicated server for only 10btc that first time, and why the prices were so good. It's also why he's been moving others around onto different servers. Requests came in for the servers and he'd have to move us off them (as we were the illegitemate customers) onto something else temporarily.
I'd say his boss caught him and fired him. Which is understandable.
I don't think the possible situation doesn't make anybody trust him more. I'm not saying you should, I'm just adding my own suspicions when I began doing business with him. How else could he offer hosting so cheaply? It's like buying goods from someone on the street for far below what they cost in the shop. You know that if those goods are original then they either stolen or fell off the back of a truck or something. Bottom line is use escrow for everyone, good bad ugly, whatever, and have a basic agreement, a basic contract. Avoid "gentlemen agreements", because real gentlemen will go through an escrow if you ask for it. And they themselves should be happy for the extra security it provides.
|
|
|
2706
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Servers for btc
|
on: February 17, 2011, 01:39:02 AM
|
I got a server from just a man for a month period when he started over a month or two ago. It went fine, was super happy with the server etc. Coming up to the second month I pm'ed him asking if we were still ok to continue, he got back to me saying he couldn't. Which was ok, no loss for me I was using it as a high bandwidth i2p node.
Then he got on to me offering more servers, and since I needed hosting for the usercredit rating service were building I thought it was a great deal(it was), 120btc for 6 months.
However, we made an agreement that the entire fee would be paid into clearcoin for the period, and if he broke his end of the agreement he'd lose the payment (if I broke the terms of the hosting contract the same would happen to me).
He made good and set up the server, again I was happy with it. I was about to put the btc into clearcoin when I got the same email as everyone else here.
I really do think the guy lost his job. He was probably an admin at a hosting company and thought he could make some btc on servers that were not being used (without telling his boss). This is why I was able to get a dedicated server for only 10btc that first time, and why the prices were so good. It's also why he's been moving others around onto different servers. Requests came in for the servers and he'd have to move us off them (as we were the illegitemate customers) onto something else temporarily.
I'd say his boss caught him and fired him. Which is understandable.
The end result is that an escrow service should be used at all times, not just with people you don't quite trust. As people, even trustworthy ones get into bad situations that can make them do things they would not otherwise do. Always use escrow, clearcoin is a great example, and it's operated by one of the bitcoin devs, he's got a great reputation. On top of that it's free for transactions below 100btc, so use it why not?
|
|
|
2707
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: [POLL] Should we ban something on the Bitcoin marketplace?
|
on: February 17, 2011, 01:24:28 AM
|
Maybe a compromise, a middle ground can be found here. Do not ban them per s.e. but send them to a reservation... like give them their separate sections on the forum and let them stagnate or flourish there.
Creating a separate "black market" subforum will just give it more exposure. I think you should ban child porn, assassination offers and similar things related to aggression on other individuals, but not drugs or consensual porn, because it's just peaceful trade with no victims. That might not be a terrible thing, look a /b/ on 4chan Could have our own /b/ board
|
|
|
2709
|
Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Should we ban something on the Bitcoin marketplace?
|
on: February 16, 2011, 02:03:56 PM
|
If it won't cause the forum to be shutdown then I see no reason to ban anything. With the exception of childporn. There are some things that people wont tollerate and thats anything to do with childporn.
If that were being discussed in the forum, aka "selling wild pics of kids for btc" sort of thing then thst will bring large groups in attacking not just bitcoin but the forum too. That would make us a major target for politicians, the media and others.
At least until the forum is hosted as a tor hidden service and accessed only through a tor inproxy or someting.
|
|
|
2711
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Looking for co-investor(s) for credit rating and bail bond system
|
on: February 16, 2011, 11:12:52 AM
|
Dave, we may take you up on this, what's the servers specifications?
More than enough. Already hosts bitcoin central, some other sites. IIRC it's a Xeon octo-core with 16Gb RAM, 2Tb HDD and 1Gb network connection. I'd do the admin and deployments, you wouldn't get SSH access (a phpMyAdmin on the DB and a JSON-RPC access to the client could be available if needed/requested) Good, we'll take that then.
|
|
|
2719
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Looking for co-investor(s) for credit rating and bail bond system
|
on: February 15, 2011, 12:19:47 PM
|
Regarding the development costs, I will be able to give an estimate if there is a rough spec draft made. Lots of the bitcoin-central.net will be re-used in order to minimize the development time.
Your back, though we lost you there. Thats great, that helps a lot for me doing up the spec. No worries What license will you want it under ? That depends on the licencing issues raised by integrating parts of BC into it. Does it cause any issues or are we free to go ahead and pick our own licence?
|
|
|
2720
|
Economy / Marketplace / Re: Bitcoin Credit Score Project - Beginning
|
on: February 15, 2011, 12:18:11 PM
|
Strictly in my own opinion, I would not never touch a system coded by this individual after reading about his activities on this forum.
Interaction with a monetary/credit system requires trust and regardless of the individual that may be the front man for this system, the underlying individual who is developing the system should not be trusted. Again this is strictly my opinion and only that.
I would say that your opinion is sound in it's reasoning.
|
|
|
|