|
63
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Solidcoin lost transaction
|
on: November 01, 2011, 08:27:24 PM
|
Litecoin has passed Solidcoin in value on BTC-E and will also do on Solidcoin24 sometime soon.
You mean because you pushed it a little bit? 1 pusher doesn't work out at the end, when his investments are bought, the price will get back to his real price... |
|
|
|
|
65
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: November 01, 2011, 09:16:56 AM
|
If you don't/know/understand what 51% is a reference to then I recommend you just uninstall your miner and delete the ScamCoin code now.
You are the height of dumb.... saying something costs X amount of money to achieve indicates a planned attack? Were you dropped on your head as a child? About a dozen or so times? Actually, the TaxCoin fanboy has a point there. This transcript just reflects the nursery school maturity level of some discussions on the SC IRC, not a real attack intent. And what is the actual maturity level then if someone actually DID multiple 51% attacks? |
|
|
|
|
67
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: banned from solidcoin forum
|
on: October 29, 2011, 05:52:16 PM
|
Spacey, the fact is there isn't any 'discussion' because dissent is censored.
I guess since RS has already stated that SC is "his" and "will never be a democracy", it's understandable.
But you shouldn't be surprised when people who get involved with cryptocurrencies through Bitcoin are shocked when they find out how poorly SC is managed.
There are lots of discussions on the SC channel, it's maybe you that is sooo biased that you don't allow any discussion? |
|
|
|
|
68
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: banned from solidcoin forum
|
on: October 29, 2011, 05:44:51 PM
|
|
What do you expect? Every day lot of people come to the SC IRC channel and troll about the same things... "SC is not open source, SC is centralized, SC sux..." They mostly don't want to discuss, just complain... This is very annoying. If they want to cry, they should go to their mummy. If you don't like football, do you go to the football stadion and yell "football sucks"? No, it's just on the internet that everybody thinks he can go everywhere and do everything withouth consequences...
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 29, 2011, 12:33:26 PM
|
I guess you were just screwiing with me, make that four times now banned instantly by Realsolid on sign in.
Usually only trolls get banned :-) In Solidcoin IRC simply saying anything RS disagrees with gets you banned. The same way sp0tter got banned last night for simply calling him out on BS. RS is one of the biggest cowards on the internet. It's true, I looked at the log, BTCEX was banned almost immediatly So my statements remains: trolls get banned ^^ |
|
|
|
|
71
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 29, 2011, 09:48:44 AM
|
I guess you were just screwiing with me, make that four times now banned instantly by Realsolid on sign in.
Usually only trolls get banned :-) |
|
|
|
|
72
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 28, 2011, 05:22:22 PM
|
Why revive multiple coins I0C/IXC/SC1? Why spreading the buying potential on 3 different coins? (Because if nobody buys the coins they are useless) Why not just 1 coin: SolidCoinPro?  So at the end for GPU there would be mamma BTC, ugly NMC, fresh SC1, and for CPU the fair LTC and the disturbing SC2 (I suppose that GG, TBX and FBX are going to die) |
|
|
|
|
73
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: How to dismantled the awesome security of Bitcoin network in 4 simple steps.
|
on: October 28, 2011, 05:09:44 PM
|
Um the point of a double spend is that by the time the network realizes and prices dropped you have already spent your funds twice and don't give a crap. Granted SolidCoin is worthless but if it ever was you could for example take $100K worth of SC and buy $100K worth of BTC, perform attack and then buy $100K worth of BTC again. $100K worth of SC -> $200K worth of BTC. That is the entire reason for a double spend. To in effect double your money (at the expense of victims). An unlawful transfer of wealth from attacker to victim.
Exactly, therefore we need a solid 51% protection |
|
|
|
|
75
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 28, 2011, 07:30:09 AM
|
Am I the only one who sees that holding SC just became a huge liability?
I'm not super clear on laws, but I'm pretty sure holding a currency whose intentions are to subvert governments is frowned upon, legally. Depending on where you live, of course.
Maybe you should forward this to your congressmen if you really are concerned! It doesn't help to protect the country if just publish it in a small niche forum... |
|
|
|
|
76
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 28, 2011, 07:13:45 AM
|
Hey retard, Ahimoth was the only person other than Ch to know about the block reduction and to have the source. I think that qualifies as inner circle. His own people are calling SC dead if he continues to lead it.
Could you please mark the according sentences above? As "retard" I am not able to get your points |
|
|
|
|
77
|
Other / Archival / Re: delete
|
on: October 28, 2011, 07:06:06 AM
|
This is his inner circle of devs supposedly, normally he would just ban anyone else.
If you really think that a PUBLIC IRC channel which can be joined by anyone (besides the banned accounts) is the inner circle  You can also get there and discuss about SC2 if you like |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
