 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]
|
新站都没什么人气的吧，哪来的什么人气NO1  没人气才需要推广 |
|
|
|
嘻嘻，‘做币’人才，听起来怎么那么像‘作弊’人才？ |
|
|
|
Once again I've been silenced and my posts with a calm alternative view have been removed from /r/Quarkcoin.http://www.reddit.com/user/pillow_made_of_tacos (make sure to read the parent of each comment!) Anyone looking to get into this coin. Look at the people running it. "Libertarians" but are controlling free speech. Lol. It just shows how weak this community is. It shows that they cannot take criticism, they cannot take alternate point of views or alternate opinions. This should be the biggest red flag for anyone getting into this coin at this time, or anyone still holding.Weak, I say. "Calm alternative view" is a bit of a stretch when you're flagrantly attacking the coin, its community and calling it stagnant while blatantly misrepresenting information to suit your own devices to a new person on the forum. As the rest of my replies stated. Your crusade is really weird - you literally have been going at it non stop for months. It is much more weird to be active in Quark in a hopeful way for months with a graph that looks like this http://coinmarketcap.com/qrk_180.html Like I said, you guys must be masochists. There is no misrepresentation of information on my part. You are twisting my words. I am not twisting your words. Only one example - you made it seem as though the ShaqFu game we're to be included in is the same as the one from the 90s. It is not - it is a modern sequel with a terrific development team behind it. I and others work hard for each other and for the community, not just our own self interest. So you were twisting my words. Shaq Fu was originally called an abomination by EA in the 90's, and is still considered to this day to be one of the worst games in history. I even talked about DLC (which they didn't have in 1995) in my original post. I don't know how you could be stupid enough to combine that with Quark being released again on a SNES cartridge with Quark support? Actually you didn't use the word originally and you didn't mention DLC at all in your post. You're just relying on the fact that it was deleted to publicly revise it. this has distinguishing feature,I am ery interested in, nice future for sure. |
|
|
|
我在用360 |
|
|
|
|
