I tried with guiminer it seems to connect with a good speed, but am I mining anything at all? Or do we need to use minerd which is kinda slow  Yes, you need to mine using minerd, since it uses a completely different cryptographic algorithm, also explaining why it's "slow". |
|
|
|
|
The Simplecoin pool seems to send new work units every minute instead of every five seconds. Since the pool has longpolling it reduces the chance of stale shares (shares that became invalid because they were sent after a new block was generated)
And no, you don't have to do anything of that manually.
|
|
|
|
so only " PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)" is a share accepted by simplecoin.us? what about all the hashes showing like this [2011-10-02 00:53:46] thread 0: 38059 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:53:46] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 00:54:32] thread 1: 66285 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:54:48] thread 0: 67162 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:55:32] thread 1: 65198 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:55:48] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:56:32] thread 1: 66303 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:56:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:57:31] thread 1: 65216 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:57:49] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:58:32] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:58:50] thread 0: 66060 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:59:34] thread 1: 66321 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 00:59:50] thread 0: 64977 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:01] HTTP request failed: Empty reply from ser
[2011-10-02 01:00:35] longpoll failed, sleeping for 30s
[2011-10-02 01:00:38] thread 1: 65233 hashes, 1.03 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:40] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:00:40] thread 0: 50813 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:10
0] thread 1: 1280 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:00:43] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2[2011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 0: 3882 hashes, 1.17 khash/sec
011-10-02 01:00:43] thread 1: 3519 hashes, 1.16 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:01:48] thread 1: 70380 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:01:54] thread 0: 77640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:02:48] thread 1: 65981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:02:53] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:02:53] thread 0: [64926 hashes, 2011-10-02 01:02
85 hashes, 1.110 khash/sec
.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:03:14] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10[2011-10-0-02 02 01:03:14] thread 0: 22568 hashes, 11:.
03:14] thread 1: 22010 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:04:14] thread 1: 62885 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:04:15] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:05:12] thread 1: 63950 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:05:14] thread 0: 64480 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:06:13] thread 1: 66155 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:06:14] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:07:14] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:07:15] thread 0: 65572 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:13] thread 1: 65070 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:14] thread 0: 64497 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:08:36] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:08:36] thread 1: 25654 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:08
480 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:09:39] thread 0: 66763 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:09:41] thread 1: 66923 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 0: 29683 hashes, 1.06 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:10:07] thread 1: 28469 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 0: 63606 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:11:05] thread 1: 63264 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:05] thread 0: 66953 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:07] thread 1: 66593 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:12:09] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:12:09] thread 0: 3532 hash[2011-10-02 01:12:09]
shes, es, 1.07 khash/sec
1.00 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:13:01] thread 1: 56400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:13:13] thread 0: 70640 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:14:01] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:14:14] thread 0: 67276 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:15:03] thread 1: 66352 hashes, 1.07 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:15:15] thread 0: 66173 hashes, 1.08 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:02] thread 1: 64211 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:14] thread 0: 64038 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:41] thread 1: 43738 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:16:41] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 01:17:13] thread 0: 66246 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:17:28] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 [2011-10-02 01:17:28] thre01:17:28] thread 0: 16319
361.09 khash/se5 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
c
[2011-10-02 01:17:38] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:17:38] thread 1: 11150 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:17
860 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:18:40] thread 1: 66900 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:18:45] thread 0: 72400 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:19:40] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:19:45] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:20:38] thread 1: 65803 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:20:43] thread 0: 65818 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:21:38] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:21:43] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:40] thread 1: 68072 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:45] thread 0: 68087 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:22:52] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:22:52] thread 1: 13555 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:22
98 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:23:53] thread 0: 65982 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:23:55] thread 1: 67775 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:24:12] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01[2011-10-02 01:24:12] thread 1: 18286 hashes, 1.0
:24:12] thread 0: 20109 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:25:11] thread 1: 64538 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:25:13] thread 0: 67030 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:10] thread 1: 65631 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:13] thread 0: 65931 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:27] thread 1: 18202 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:26:27] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: true (yay!!!)
[2011-10-02 01:27:12] thread 0: 67048 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:27:28] thread 1: 68257 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 0: 57784 hashes, 1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:28:04] thread 1: 40762 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:06] thread 0: 67981 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:07] thread 1: 67936 hashes, 1.09 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:29:59] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:29:59] thread 1: 59018 hashes, [2011-10-02 01:29
351 hashes, 1.13 khash/sec
1.13 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:01] thread 0: 67189 hashes, 1.10 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:02] thread 1: 68097 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:31:10] LONGPOLL detected new block
[2011-10-02 01:31:10] thread 0: 9738 hashes, [2011-10-02 101:31
82 hashes, .12 khash/sec
1.12 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:32:09] thread 0: 64920 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:32:12] thread 1: 68417 hashes, 1.11 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:33:07] thread 0: 66020 hashes, 1.15 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:33:10] thread 1: 66210 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:34:07] thread 0: 68296 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
[2011-10-02 01:34:10] thread 1: 68493 hashes, 1.14 khash/sec
LONGPOLLs mean that a new block has been created to the Tenebrix network rendering all your current work units void. Those hashing speeds mean how many times the miner has tried to find a match for that work unit before requesting a new one. Also explains why you get messages more frequently when you are solo mining, the miner requests new work units every five seconds when you are solo mining unlike pools. |
|
|
|
A miner that supports scrypt. The only one that supports scrypt at the moment is minerd which comes with the Tenebrix pack. And no, you can't use anything like CUDA, it would be against the Tenebrix's point of being a GPU-hostile cryptocurrency.  |
|
|
|
|
No, just set your worker to TBX Proportional and it will be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
The port is 8337 like with some Bitcoin mining pools.
|
|
|
|
It just started trading yesterday. Please enlighten us because I haven't seen an exchange so far etc. What is 1000TBX in BTC or USD ? Maybe this will be another one of the pizza for 200 000 USD moments etc. [/quote] https://btc-e.com/tbx_exchanger |
|
|
|
|
10 difficulty means it's 10x harder to generate the current block than the block chain's first block.
|
|
|
|
I'm still lucky enough to get one block per 2-4 hours. What are you using to mine? Q8800 with 3 threads at 1.10 khash/s each. |
|
|
|
Hi there, thanks for the service!
I noticed recently (today actually) that Java is launched whenever loading dailybitcoins.org, I checked the console log and I noticed there is something fishy going on:
Live entry: key=http://www.filenetworking.com/,http://www.bitcoinplus.com/jar/bitcoinplus-miner.jar, refCount=1, threadGroup=sun.plugin2.applet.Applet2ThreadGroup[name=http://www.filenetworking.com/-threadGroup,maxpri=4]
Doesn't take long to guess what that is...
I don't want to accuse you, perhaps it's an advertiser, just wanted to let you know.
Oh wow, I doubt he'll get a single bitcent back from his investment. It takes hours to generate 0.000027 BTC using the Bitcoinplus miner, so I have no idea why anyone would use it. |
|
|
|
Just wait for sc2.0 its going to have protection against the 51% attack as well and more features. There is no point in opening another currency with known problems, no business will invest in something that could have them potentially lose all their earnings. Public beta opens this weekend.
So funny.. CoinHunter has only delivered bug ridden code and insane rants, only a fool would trust him with anything important. From what I've read, CoinHunter has been praising his own fork without a single hint of actual, factual information related to the new version of SolidCoin. That, and he starts throwing insults around when anyone doubts him. |
|
|
|
I got 0.05 BTC after I read your post and refreshed the page. |
|
|
|
I'm still lucky enough to get one block per 2-4 hours. |
|
|
|
Wait, the transactions need 101 transactions before they are accepted by the exchange?  EDIT: Nevermind, they are on my account already. Just a typo on the site. |
|
|
|
I can try too. I've worked on bitcoin-qt a bit (only the GUI portion though), but implementing changes from the Tenebrix fork should be trivial (as in copy-paste everything and change stuff if needed). |
|
|
|
|
So, has anyone tried adding scrypt mining option into CGMiner?
I may try it soon as an exercise of some sort.
EDIT:
Nevermind, compiling the program on Windows seems incredibly difficult and there are barely no instructions.
|
|
|
|
|
So, is anyone going to keep this fork of Tenebrix up-to-date with the original code base, so that improvements implemented to Tenebrix will also be carried to Fairbrix?
|
|
|
|
|
Good. Hopefully it will be supported like Tenebrix.
|
|
|
|
Couldn't bother to rename the repository yet. I'm not doing this seriously, just for science. |
|
|
|
Just spent few minutes renaming everything from Tenebrix to Fairbrix (alongside with some other stuff to differentiate it from Tenebrix) https://github.com/Matoking/TenebrixTime well spent. And no, I have no idea if this will work. I'll try it and see if it explodes in a nuclear fireball. (pretty unlikely but would be kinda cool if it happened) EDIT: Assertion fail. No nuclear fireball. Sad face. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
