407
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 💦Condensate [RAIN]💦MANDATORY UPDATE MAY 2 - PLEASE READ!💦
|
on: May 02, 2017, 06:43:06 AM
|
well how can you condensate my wallet with coins if u r chain is non functional. it wasn't yesterday when you said you sent payments, now I realize the project is over. my bad, Im out, final answer
My bad for expecting something from one of these new shit coin launches
back to my own project, obviously not worth the time to help another.
I tried to play with others, my mom be proud
someone hijacked the chain - orphaning all previous blocks including prior transactions. obavijest asked me to help rescue it. all is in process.
|
|
|
411
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] XtraBYtes - The Proof of Signature Blockchain Database
|
on: May 01, 2017, 02:17:24 PM
|
OK. That's the code. Thank you
But is there an online place running this script? I would like to check how many nodes are running. Investors need to validate that all the hype about the nodes is confirmed by actually nodes being created. The dev said he want a good quantity of nodes, like 256. That's a huge quantity of nodes and it's easy to see that a good proportion of the XtraBYtes cheerleaders are short term profit hop'ers.
I'm not attacking, I'm not trolling. Legit concerns only. Let's see the seriousness of this community. Thanks
zero nodes till block 50,000. registering of nodes is now.
|
|
|
415
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] XtraBYtes - The Proof of Signature Blockchain Database
|
on: April 28, 2017, 12:27:03 PM
|
I must say that I voted for 1M but I agree now by reading this that it's too much coins required to run a node I would like to change my vote for a number between 200k and 350k coins.
Also, it would be the best if we could get the opinions of the dev and ccr too.
i also voted for 1mill, but am having 2nd thoughts i like the notion that they could be a serious investment, but unfortunately without any idea of what the market value might be like in 3 months, it's hard to usefully project a value. i've changed my mind to 350k - 400k:) this gives room for short term growth in price where they might still be under 1btc, and gives a lot of scope for coins in nodes vs circulation. should the coin gain serious value, then those static nodes might become very serious, and plausibly the amount necessary might need some reconsideration at some point. ---- "a change is good as a holiday"
|
|
|
416
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TOR] Torcoin - X11 PoW - Tor Integrated Crypto - Torcoin.org
|
on: April 28, 2017, 06:06:07 AM
|
it is not working. i can see only paper wallet designs , logos & images only. or if i don't know then pls help me how it works. you need to open index.html in a browser. this is to insure you're running it from your computer, rather than a potentially hazardous website. after all you're generating a "unique" privkey so doing it locally is safer than remotely. there's an example of it working here http://www.torcoinfaucet.com/paper/ << this however will download the zip file from my git rather than the TorCoin git. edit, i might suggest to linenoise that he change that (if he continues to host the paper wallet generator that is)
|
|
|
417
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] XtraBYtes - The Proof of Signature Blockchain Database
|
on: April 28, 2017, 01:05:53 AM
|
the question is how easy it will be to pass staticnodes around, ie buy/sell them.
1mill is obviously a largish investment atm, and if you want to liquidate your staticnode without too much fuss, then you'll need to find someone willing to invest the required funds. if, for example, the price goes to 200, 2btc is a hefty chunk of real money and will require careful handling ie escrow
some people might find it simpler to just sell the coins in the market rather than as a staticnode.
it might be preferable to go lower - 500k giving more scope for many static nodes, and slightly less impediment to buying/selling if the price gets higherer.
|
|
|
419
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [TOR] Torcoin - X11 PoW - Tor Integrated Crypto - Torcoin.org
|
on: April 26, 2017, 03:46:33 PM
|
Hey @Bumba, is there probably any problem with the TorCoin-Qt wallet? Sincerely I simply do trading in general and do business online, so I am not practical with this of mine coins with programs like TorCoin-Qt. I understand that running BitCoin-Qt is totally important to the network and I want to contribute to this while I earn some TorCoins but I think there are some malfunctions of the program in general so it does not allow staking as it should be. Taking a look around Torcoin-Qt I realize that these could be some of the reasons why it is not yet possible to me start staking after more than 36 hours: - The network traffic may be slow, at the moment this is working with
some In: movements of 17MB and about 6MB Out movements, I do not know if it is good and what this is related to, but I believe this is slow. - In the debug window I notice that there are lots of messages like these:
-trying connection 91.14.3.11:23669 lastseen=90.0hrs connection timeout
-trying connection 179.55.236.204:23669 lastseen=3.1hrs CTxMemPool::accept() : accepted 5e01f1091f (poolsz 1) connection timeout connect() failed after select(): Connection refused
-Flushing wallet.dat Flushed wallet.dat 276ms connection timeout
-Flushed 585 addresses to peers.dat 2ms trying connection 100.33.157.128:23669 lastseen=10.2hrs connection timeout
Tons of these ... almost all!!! There is something wrong here, do you guys think you know a solution? I think this affair negatively affects the network and that I will not be able to mine a coin ever... Any help please?? different code bases generate different output into the debug.log, that output looks pretty normal. i had a look at this transaction, it took ~24hours for 88 coins to stake, how does that compare to yr value? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/tor/tx.dws?30650.htm
|
|
|
|