Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 01:08:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / MWC1616 on: March 02, 2024, 01:38:26 PM
Hi does anyone have any insights or information regarding how the random number generator class MWC1616 worked when seeding? Thanks
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: October 21, 2023, 07:16:42 PM
As I have. Good luck guys, I have already found my tree in the middle of the ocean.😉

Please enlighten us with your tree finding method
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: April 19, 2023, 09:58:03 PM
why was the last post of "Professor of wilds" here about puzzle #66 deleted? To the poster: please write again your proposal about the key search and the list you posted
i deleted it because i realized that no one would probably help me if you want to know what i said i have a high chance with the right people we could solve the next keys without kang or brute.

Change your setting to accept dm from newbie Im interested in your work and would like to help
4  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Keyhunt - development requests - bug reports on: April 19, 2023, 06:56:19 PM
Guys how do I store a few GB of public keys/data in compressed format and when I have done it, do I need a tool to be able to read such data?

Because notepad becomes unresponsive when we load it with even less than a GB.
I'd appreciate if anyone can help.
Regards ~ dig.

Emeditor
5  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: April 19, 2023, 11:01:45 AM
Who is awd?
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it on: April 19, 2023, 10:46:39 AM
why was the last post of "Professor of wilds" here about puzzle #66 deleted? To the poster: please write again your proposal about the key search and the list you posted

Just came back to this thread and yes the post has gone???
7  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: September 21, 2022, 01:57:31 PM
Has anyone been using this program?

Im currently using the option modebooks which combines affix(1word)+suffix(1word)

Is there a way to use it by say affix or suffix using 6+words

Does anyone know what this command does in the script?

//Maximum length of each Prime word (+1 because first byte contains word length)
#define MAX_LEN_WORD_PRIME 20

//Maximum length of each Affix word (+1 because first byte contains word length)
#define MAX_LEN_WORD_AFFIX 4

Thanks for any support and advice
8  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: September 12, 2022, 08:45:59 AM
Hello just noticed you paused development on this project how come?
9  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: August 22, 2022, 08:58:28 AM
Please bare with me as I’m not the most tech savvy.

My setup is windows 11, using windows subsystem Linux and Ubuntu 22

I’ve installed latest nvidia drivers and latest toolkit in Ubuntu

I think when I go to make it it’s not finding the path which is right in the makefile

I’ve read you have to change 2 path environment variables but I’m struggling with it

Can someone help us open, edit and save the editor please

Thanks
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: August 21, 2022, 12:02:23 PM
Has anyone got this up and running I’m having a hard time setting the right cuda paths?
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: August 20, 2022, 08:43:20 AM
Thanks fxsniper, in the makefile compute was 86 which is right, I’ve tried changing the cuda path but is there anything else I should change aswell? Cheers
12  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: August 19, 2022, 10:40:10 PM
anyone know which is the correct path to use?

/.
/etc
/etc/nvcc.profile
/usr
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/bin2c
/usr/bin/cuda-memcheck
/usr/bin/cudafe++
/usr/bin/cuobjdump
/usr/bin/fatbinary
/usr/bin/gpu-library-advisor
/usr/bin/nvcc
/usr/bin/nvdisasm
/usr/bin/nvlink
/usr/bin/nvprune
/usr/bin/ptxas
/usr/include
/usr/include/nvvm.h
/usr/lib
/usr/lib/cuda
/usr/lib/cuda/bin
/usr/lib/cuda/include
/usr/lib/cuda/lib64
/usr/lib/cuda/nvvm
/usr/lib/cuda/version.txt
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_callbacks.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_driver_cbid.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_memory.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_patching.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_result.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/include/sanitizer_runtime_cbid.h
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/Sanitizer/libsanitizer-public.so
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/cicc
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/crt
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/crt/link.stub
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/crt/prelink.stub
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/g++
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/gcc
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/nvcc
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/libdevice
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/libdevice/libdevice.10.bc
/usr/share
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/nvidia-cuda-toolkit
/usr/share/doc/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/README.Debian.gz
/usr/share/doc/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/copyright
/usr/share/lintian
/usr/share/lintian/overrides
/usr/share/lintian/overrides/nvidia-cuda-toolkit
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man1
/usr/share/man/man1/cuda-binaries.1.gz
/usr/lib/cuda/nvvm/libdevice
/usr/lib/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/bin/nvcc.profile
/usr/share/doc/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/cuda-memcheck.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/cuobjdump.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/nvcc.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/nvdisasm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/nvprune.1.gz
13  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: CudaBrainSecp - Secp256k1 Seed Recovery Tool on: August 19, 2022, 10:27:06 PM
@ETFbitcoin what did you change in the makefile i'm getting lots of commands not found?
14  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why have Satoshi's early mined coins an unusual nonce value distribution? on: November 17, 2021, 06:50:17 PM
Thanks for the explanation Danny
15  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Why have Satoshi's early mined coins an unusual nonce value distribution? on: November 17, 2021, 10:01:34 AM
...
All in all, people WANT to find magic patterns so they can discern order out of randomness.
Alas it is pointless. Random is as random does. Any patterns found will be there for some programming necessity (or bug), not some secret illuminati code to allow you to find those 800,000 BTC - bad luck to you Smiley

If you look at this gif image (least significant byte LSB values for the blocks mined 2009 - mid 2010)

source: https://news.bitcoin.com/online-sleuths-believe-satoshi-nakamotos-bitcoin-stash-is-a-blockchain-treasure-hunt-meant-to-be-found/
then you can see that there are several ranges where the LSB values are not distributed uniformly. The whole picture should look like the values 60 - 255, then we could say that it is random. But what was done here can't be there for some programming necessity or bug, and why should Satoshi mine these values onto the blockchain?

Btw. Satoshi's blocks contain 1.1 million BTC and not 800,000.

What exactly is this chart showing that the addresses/keys could be in a set range?
16  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Let test my scrypt for find a privkey ? on: October 25, 2021, 07:00:49 PM
and as you see, no answer...Cheesy

question why? hmm

Teach me the path and you’ll be rewarded with riches my friend
17  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Let test my scrypt for find a privkey ? on: October 25, 2021, 06:42:28 PM
Interwiep I can give you 2btc as soon as I get a hit you gotta trust me send the script
18  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Let test my scrypt for find a privkey ? on: October 25, 2021, 06:17:11 PM
yep, for 2 BTC on my address account, if I received, then I will give you. Are we ok?

Send a working script and you’ll get a tip but 2 btc? that’s waaaay to much dude 😂
19  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Let test my scrypt for find a privkey ? on: October 25, 2021, 05:57:32 PM
@a.a

Do you know about what Cobras is talking?
My inteligence has been broken by him.Smiley

I thought you had a working script can you DM it so I can try?

I do not know what has COBRAS , but be informed he HAS NOT my script.

And all people just only " please give, " , but first please understand -> buy book of algebra , and start from beginning,  leanr yourself, becouse if any who can will give you mathematical magic formula, propably you will not understand why and what to change .
 

Dude I haven’t time to read books I’m good with math can you share the script in DM
20  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Let test my scrypt for find a privkey ? on: October 25, 2021, 05:43:16 PM
Cobras why always 21 transactions?
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!