 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Is there any chance to still get one's money back?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Abiky,
- first things first. Don't accept a 0-conf transaction if its value is high. Simply wait for some blocks to role by.
- If the tx value is of casual size there's no need whatsoever to wait for any confirmation on BCH. Rollbacks hardly happen. You can check one of many pages doing statistics on it.
- It is not an experimental or new solution on Bitcoin Cash. It was already used on Bitcoin before Bitcoin Core activated Replace-By-Fee (RBF). Thus it is a well tested on Bitcoin in general.
- RBF undermines 0-conf when the blocksize is limit and demand is high. This situation leads to very long confirmation times and thus provides an easy way to double-spent your coins. BCH don't have this problem, only BTC has it.
- RBF has been deactivated on Bitcoin Cash because 0-conf are very useful. I would suggest to simply try it out yourself with services like BitPay, SatoshiDice or whatever service (there are plenty).
To sum it up: a blockchain has to make the choice between Replace-By-Fee and 0-conf tx. Bitcoin Core goes for RBF, Bitcoin Cash goes for 0-conf.
This is my first post here after more than six years. Let's see how spirits are in here these days.
|
|
|
|
Hi, not paying any attention to bitcoins lately, I know realize how its marketprice has risen since november or mid january. Trying to understand this I looked at this graph: http://www.bitcoinx.com/charts1/depth_mtgox.pngand I find myself with two questions: Do I interpret correctly that the red chart reflects the amount of BTCs people ask for / would like to buy? If that is so, why does BTC price rice with declining demand? Or am I indeed confusing ask and bid sum here? Why do the graphs seem to have a synchronized or even an axially symmetric signal/part to their trends? Thank you Luigi |
|
|
|
Super, p2k, das find ich klasse. Dank Dir. Bin seit Weihnachten vollständig zu euch dazugestoßen. Leider bin ich nur ein kleiner Fisch  |
|
|
|
|
fertbit
treetop / bittop
nebula
|
|
|
|
/usr/bin/ld: cgminer-adl.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1'
[...]
libdl.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
Can anyone help me on this? New version: 2.0.8, links in top post as always.
Version 2.0.8 - November 11, 2011
Problem solved with v2.0.8. Thanks ck |
|
|
|
|
I don't quite get it. Will the solution of the picture increase forever and everyone visiting the site or is it just for my web-session on your page?
|
|
|
|
unfortunately it doesn't  |
|
|
|
/usr/bin/ld: cgminer-adl.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1'
[...]
libdl.so: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
Can anyone help me on this? I have all *.h files from the AMD-ADL-SDK copied to the corresponding folder. configure-procedure went through just fine ------------------------------------------------------------------------
cgminer 2.0.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuration Options Summary:
OpenCL...............: FOUND. GPU mining support enabled
ADL..................: SDK found, GPU monitoring support enabled
ASM..................: true
Compilation............: make (or gmake)
CPPFLAGS.............:
CFLAGS...............: -O2 -Wall -march=native
LDFLAGS..............: -lpthread -ldl
Installation...........: make install (as root if needed, with 'su' or 'sudo')
prefix...............: /usr/local
I tried both... the latest git sources and the tarball provided. Hmm - have you actually installed the SDK as per the instructions?
(and what version of the SDK did you install?)
AMD APP SDK 2.4 I do not have ADL SDK installed - just took the *.h files as supposed by the instructions. Version 3.0 |
|
|
|
/usr/bin/ld: cgminer-adl.o: undefined reference to symbol 'dlopen@@GLIBC_2.1'
Can anyone help me on this? I have all *.h files from the AMD-ADL-SDK copied to the corresponding folder. configure-procedure went through just fine ------------------------------------------------------------------------
cgminer 2.0.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Configuration Options Summary:
OpenCL...............: FOUND. GPU mining support enabled
ADL..................: SDK found, GPU monitoring support enabled
ASM..................: true
Compilation............: make (or gmake)
CPPFLAGS.............:
CFLAGS...............: -O2 -Wall -march=native
LDFLAGS..............: -lpthread -ldl
Installation...........: make install (as root if needed, with 'su' or 'sudo')
prefix...............: /usr/local
I tried both... the latest git sources and the tarball provided. |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
any novelty on this topic? Is any of the standard miner capable of limiting the GPU usage?
I just don't won't my gpu to work under high stress when I'm around . It gets the cooling started which creates a hell of acoustic smok.
Tried to play around with phoenix's AGGRESSION or poclbm's getwork-rate but I guess that's not the way to go. Would process priority under linux make sense?
Bye
|
|
|
|
Liegen die coins jetzt seit 5 Tagen in LA auf dem Postamt rum?  Nicht, dass Winnetou mit seiner Andeutung am Ende doch nicht so Unrecht hatte ... |
|
|
|
Whats the biggest bet you are willing to accept?
Hey BitEXpress, according to the bet most people seem to think your threat is just idle. And in fact, if you'd be that sure about it -with all that boasting your doing- you had already put a high stake on the 51-attack being successful |
|
|
|
|
Hi,
weiß einer, was genau bei witcoin los ist, warum deren bitcoind nicht läuft bzw. wann es behoben sein soll?
Danke & Ciao
|
|
|
|
|
