Bitcoin will have legacy support for old addresses due to people using cold storage. Destructive chains are not pegged with bitcoins but are bootstrapped with bitcoins at their genesis. I'm not a fan of the Destructive chain concept, but I believe they are inevitable because parasites serve the purpose of keeping a system strong and that greed will always motivate some people to be parasites.

Why should he be free to do this and I am not free to do the same?

onemorebtc can you please explain me your signature?

I accidentially pasted one of my XMR addresses in the google search bar and the following pastebin came up:

http://pastebin.com/LEhABQcu

Just out of curiosity: Could someone in the know tell me what it shows and why my address would show up there?

I only use it for mining.

Thanks

Diesen Personen geht es offensichtlich einfach nur darum, den Wert Ihrer Coins zu retten.

Also wer jetzt noch positiv vom blocknet redet dem ist nicht mehr zu helfen! Der premine dump, die geleakten chatlogs wo pumps und dumps organisiert wurden und geplant. Und ganz besonders der Faktor, dass blocknet keinen realen Gegenwert hat wie es z.B. das SupnerNET hat. Starke kurseinbrüche nachdem ITO sind quasi vorprogrammiert.

In entwicklungsphasen wo nichts releast wird sinkt der kurs quasi immer. Und blocknet wird frühestens Q2 an den Start gehen. Ich würde erst einmal die füße stillhalten und paar Monaten abwarten wie sich das ganze mit blocknet entwickelt und ob es dann eventuell doch vll. einer Investition wert ist in Zukunft

Ja das sind auch meine Befürchtungen, dass nichts dabei rauskommt.

Auf der anderen Seite wenn es funktionieren würde wäre es wirklich eine feine Sache.

Werde auf jeden Fall mit einem Betrag dabei sein der nicht weh tut wenn er weg ist.

Why no whitepaper this will bring confidence in Investors. Xbridge is open source

- We have not discussed slippage. I linked you to my last post about it, but you haven't referred to it yet.


- Services aren't some new idea I've just introduced. Read the OP and the FAQ. It's not complicated.
- I have not delivered "technical infos" on implementing services because the application platform has not been created yet.


- refer to the post I linked earlier and we can discuss it.
- the decentralised exchange has not been created yet, so the "technical infos" will not be code repos or something similar.


- Starting a project with clear high-level information on what we're going to do,
- stating that we need funding to create this tech,
- and having am impressive track record of similar tech (XC's Xnode protocol, its ad hoc mesh networking, etc.),
does not constitute a scam, it constitutes a project in its early stages.

If you don't like the level of risk in our ITO, don't buy.
The level of risk is clear. We're not hiding anything about the stage the project is at.

OnemoreBTC, I have deleted links to your FUD thread because, in my opinion, you have severely insufficient basis for starting that thread.

I ask you please to delete your thread and to discuss things respectfully here.

OnemoreBTC, it is completely unethical to start a Blocknet FUD thread claiming that "Blocknet people don't give consistent answers" when the people answering your questions this morning aren't from the Blocknet (excepting me).

as i understand it blocknet doesn't implement services. its just the summ of all coins and by so their nodes connected by enabling the xbridge. so if amazon is a coin in you example. the walmart shop would be another coin joining OR the amazon coin expanding its service by hosting shops on its blockchain. both is possible.


the Blocknet is not an entity . Its the joining coins offering services.

Exactly this can be resolved simply by letting join all the coins that want to join the blocknet and then the fundation will then mark them as reputable of trust or not. that's it. the customer than can differ scam coins from others and no centralized control

You will need a blockchain service to be imbedded in the block-net , hence a new coin. It is not web 3.0