|
I read the mixing details and my conclusion is scam 100%.
Either you can modify the source/executable and do not forward money,
or description is based is not very competently.
Don't waste your time and money.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't see a TOR support. All nodes are usual.
|
|
|
|
Hondo here.
First, the challenge is to create inputs in a wallet that will eventually stake. You describe the process of minting, which comes later. However since each mint creates two new transactions that themselves will stake, you can enter. Since there have been no real entrants (that I have seen), we will allow multiple addresses, as in your case.
It seems like a good idea to add a sleep to space mints. Probably the best place to do it is right in the ThreadStakeMinter where any sleep will only affect that thread.
Glad to see you, Hondo. I changed time to 120 sec for the network health, with this interval I think I can generate blocks more than 36 hours. And I will try to write rpc-script for creating new inputs every 1 minute. My addresses for contest: SKQKVbc5kKq3ErDXEQzkiNb6bUUe9JDZcM
RzBxwRLTSWR14F8iCKJQraWFYtE8t5kHQZ
SKoVkXrURiUejEzpS3TLdS4kR7ofHvyZjFI generated about 150 blocks for last 4 hours with interval 1-2 min. |
|
|
|
11075 2014-07-21 02:25:35 2 719.128081
11074 2014-07-21 02:24:34 2 719.110821
11073 2014-07-21 02:23:34 2 1138.151268
11072 2014-07-21 02:22:34 2 1138.137945
11071 2014-07-21 02:21:34 2 586.282739
11070 2014-07-21 02:20:34 2 1053.381917
11069 2014-07-21 02:19:34 2 1053.379315
One block per minute. Devs, are you still here? Can I compete in "Challenge 2"? I have three addresses, not one. I change: Sleep(250) after block signing to Sleep(60000). I don't know if that is right, but it works. Edit: someone has generated 11 blocks in 10 secs 11087 - 11097 and my chain was forked again. and I was back on the Fork. I restored the backup of a blockchain and restart the program. Devs, you should change the source to set 1 minute interval and recompile a wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Why did you created a another thread?
|
|
|
|
Can you explain why its so risky?
I think you know what I mean. It's about the cost of investment and the potential market cap. I'm not sure that, given the other starters interesting coins, SYS easily score at least 3000 BTC in half a year (otherwise investors will get nothing or will be in the red). Plus interest, as it seemed to me, to SYS less from the community. For example VIA has stronger marketing, but less (almost nothing?) done. Plus more pressure from POW than the same VIA. This is purely my concerns as an investor. Edit: pardon, not 3000 BTC, ~2500 BTC over 6 month. |
|
|
|
|
1500 BTC for 15% (~0.000005 BTC per SYS) is so risky for investors (with POW reward 2 000 market cap over 2 months and so).
Is it possible that you reconsider your decision as it did the Crypti team?
And another thing, though I'm following this topic for a long time, but did not understand what happens with the remainder of 15% if the IPO does not collect the necessary funds.
|
|
|
|
We will consider adding a chat inside the web-wallet.
You can go ahead, add user profiles stored in a custom blockchain (in addition to anonymous users). Imagine that you see nickname, date of account creation (even some information to avoid fishing, maybe rating and rating history from whom, why), as well as CRIPTY address bound to it. You can thank the member to send him a some amount of CRIPTY with a couple of clicks. And you can bind this functionality to your official forum. |
|
|
|
|
Total cap is a double edged sword: either those who invested are dissatisfied, or the one who wanted to invest but didn't.
Apart from some exceptions.
This topic started over a month ago. IPO discussed not only in this thread but also in the others thread, for example, on the NXT forum. Personally, I follow the thread from the start.
|
|
|
|
|
It will not work.
Sometimes you come to a new thread with new coin - clearly scam, but a bunch of enthusiastic post, too much GH/s, large volumes on the exchange at the start. Until people stop to participate in it - base will not help.
The whole point of wanting to earn and greedy.
|
|
|
|
Devs, we need to set the minimum interval between the blocks in 1 minute. I have several times noticed as soon as someone starts to generate a few dozen blocks per minute - the rest can happen out of sync. We will solve two problems at once so - out of sync and stable blocks time. 40 blocks in 1 minute and I sync out... 10579 2014-07-20 01:01:51 2 1005.43863 0.0 20728399.367652 6.58417 24.8742 37.9757%
...
10639 2014-07-20 01:02:51 2 1005.838082 0.0 20728574.053104 6.56942 24.8749 38.1181%
And when I start staking too much blocks per minute: OK 3 of my wallets are now out of sync, it see the block alright but it never can download. this happen from block 8984 and it is now 9148 and counting, almost 200 straight blocks in 20 minutes. I have to admitted weird wallet and someone must know what is going on. Checkout wallet RzBxwRLTSWR14F8iCKJQraWFYtE8t5kHQZ. once it's out of syn it will never able to sync again. my other 2 wallets are keeping up alright.
Maybe we should set checking there void BitcoinMiner(CWallet *pwallet, bool fProofOfStake)
...
auto_ptr<CBlock> pblock(CreateNewBlock(pwallet, fProofOfStake));
Or change this CreateNewBlock
...
if (nSearchTime > nLastCoinStakeSearchTime)
to if (nSearchTime - nLastCoinStakeSearchTime > 60000)
I don't know, I am not coin developer. Maybe it's wrong way. I changed code of my wallet in this place if (fProofOfStake)
{
...
printf("CPUMiner : proof-of-stake block found %s\n", pblock->GetHash().ToString().c_str());
...
}
Sleep(250);
continue;
}
to If it helps I know tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Bounty for a translation is very low.
|
|
|
|
I am holding too. With profit  I changed my wallet delay time between blocks to 1 minute, approximately 1.5 days will see if that helped to network. |
|
|
|
I looked at the code in a hurry. I can not find the hidden blocks or rewards or larger than indicated premine. Maybe I missed something. But as long as everything is clean. Rich List for first 100 blocks: WWoiULj8t44AERoAiHevdWNgNauqosgjwc: 18000.0
WVLuuqTtEx7b4gbezWKdbihkvgUHe2rVL9: 41.0
WhUyKpodo1SjNb54CjYN1yQhjks4cvcoQv: 20.0
WRLsBx313VmLzeRhJgPWWt5pSjMiyreayd: 19.0
WmwQemcLZyUSSes69do2kSgXKLs3pV2vGE: 7.0
WiTy6qg5qa72odqaBuXLQQLKLKeHHSDKen: 5.0
Wfxdr5deC95Vou46JmiJbNSDRoTmUBVVi7: 2.0
WXb4PkZ1VzjeLkhiLbLbXze6BYL8t1kqqT: 2.0
WUZKUC7pkyd6wgVnC2RkHwc33M2q62Kn7u: 2.0
WPbgMY755Zg4VMzR1WkeAxx9zE1KDk4QKf: 1.0
|
|
|
|
|
StealthDevs, you should set minimal interval between POS blocks in one minute for a wallet.
I wrote about this before. When I stake the wallet created about 20-30 blocks per minute.
Is not it better to create the one block in minute but for 20-30 minutes?
I have three addresses. Can I compete in "Challenge 2" with these 3 addresses, not one?
|
|
|
|
Any one has an idea how to sleep when holding this coin?   It's not a big deal after Blackcoin x100 pump and x5 dump . |
|
|
|
Really dude 10,000 blocks before the real rewarding blocks ? Why not 1000 ? Or only 5000 ? And my favorite (I quote from a VIA pool ): Note: Round Earnings are not credited until 3610 confirms.Why ?  read. i promise it will take you further in life. Stop being so double faced ! This 10,000 blocks-ZERO-reward scheme it is just to buy time for the dev and his "investors" to pump and dump on Bittrex and other exchanges. In addition with this 3610 confirms this coin it is a palm in a face for any the regular miner. Better don't waste your money and mine something else , let this abomination not reach to the block 10,000. Blocks 10002-20801 = 10 VIA
Blocks 20802-31601 = 8 VIA
Blocks 31602-42401 = 7 VIA
Blocks 42402-53201 = 6 VIA
Blocks 53202-5312001 = 5 VIA
3600 blocks per day * 10 VIA = 36000 VIA per day It's very little pressure for the exchanges. Bittrex: BTC VOL 328.23594598 BTC
VIA VOL 2307870.50983576 VIA
|
|
|
|
Dev, is it correct premine address and amount?: NhqmcaRkTU2dwBydmQ1Ha7frPQzXV4Qmo5: 279850.0
It's not 1.3%. Total amount instamined from first 10 minute: 1,373,700 NNsJJaBPTruZoE98RYcCHyfHXtPWc9byMF: 549000.0
NgBqqRo6hBWcpv4RivXWVdgK8W6tGA6qzp: 295000.0
NhqmcaRkTU2dwBydmQ1Ha7frPQzXV4Qmo5: 279850.0
NL8pb4ainDwRPch9T4ehcEbV9oEa5AX79h: 80000.0
NTAM4EBGN9tEs17XgTuZnQPNrqwSe3KkcD: 38000.0
NQhjhe8uzZB9nV9aM75JdsNaFd6fcRjU3K: 32850.0
NdLjmmp5UnbXxNemg6sxKaTb9s6WWdydUc: 30000.0
NaHG6Ty6EPwRkr5GGTihydF8kZ22sqTPPd: 29000.0
Nfyahan8BCvBA8LYNs8cWpKKzCt7ZvnawD: 12000.0
NULJG4DHaZr7d5EUkk2pK97gn6dJhi57iE: 10000.0
NhFALm8XDZbb7VUbP7zmQBrLZY5KLC3Zip: 5000.0
NMGgArBayyzsFtSZYxUfGMHn4KSSKiZKad: 5000.0
NWFEcYMENSFdjuXuXr1WZmLcqhZ4wJQLcA: 4000.0
NePADf9k51MJayatzn7v5qAxg7gFPkCg8Y: 4000.0
|
|
|
|
|
Dev and statdude, thanks for the interview!
Communication between developers and users is very important.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
