Bitcoin Forum
March 25, 2017, 10:10:17 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
  Home Help Search Donate Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 244 »
1  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: March 18, 2017, 08:13:39 AM
Why could[n't] we have the old stats until the new are available!??
He's not just changing the stats. The pool's reward system changed too. The old stats never supported the new reward system.

Hey Luke, it says Eligius is one of your projects/didn't I read somewhere that you created it?  Could you help out with a temporary stats page if wizkid is too bogged down?  Grin

Do you still have a role on the admin side of this pool. Is it all wizkid now?
It might be theoretically possible, but I don't know how wizkid057 has changed things since I moved on, and I'm not sure it'd be the best use of my time.
(Keep in mind that when I ran the pool, I never had any web stats at all... that was always contributed by someone else)
2  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: March 18, 2017, 12:04:49 AM
Why could[n't] we have the old stats until the new are available!??
He's not just changing the stats. The pool's reward system changed too. The old stats never supported the new reward system.
3  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: March 17, 2017, 11:54:24 PM
If you're really worried, you could mine on another pool temporarily. There's nothing saying you have to be monogamous with Eligius. :p

(Not that I have any reason to doubt wizkid057 will make good on everything.)
4  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: February 03, 2017, 09:50:01 PM
What is the status or plans for support of altcoin algos? I'd really like to switch to bfgminer for the configurability and monitoring, but sha256 is not profitable on my rig.
If someone else wants to maintain different algos, we can merge it and cooperate, but I am not interested.
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Ocho aka The Future on: December 12, 2016, 03:01:38 AM
Note the submitted patch actually changes the max block size to 32 MB.

This is a hardfork and, as always, cannot be done without consensus.
6  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [14000Th] Eligius: 0% Fee BTC, 105% PPS NMC, No registration, CPPSRB on: December 09, 2016, 03:07:43 AM
There shouldn't be any benefit to pool hopping with CPPSRB, so I'd stick to Eligius.
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: PSA: Miners SHOULD NOT signal segwit if the community is not in widespread agre on: November 20, 2016, 04:55:20 AM
luke how about your promise for an implementation for 2mb base 4mb weight??
It is still a work in progress. See my hardfork2016 branch on github.

[as an independent coder as i fear your employer and paid colleagues will refuse it in core]
I do not have an employer by choice. It certainly should be refused in Core unless the community comes to agreement to deploy it first - same as with any hardfork proposal.

your vote is unclear especially in concern of the word "blocksize increase" (you dont explain legacy blocksize vs base/weight)
There is no such thing as "legacy blocksize". Witness data has always been included in the block size, and there is no reason for that to change with segwit.

what should happen:
is node implementations are released first and the community upgrade. that way miners can see that a high percentage of nodes are running and able to FULLY validate and be ready to accept what miners will produce/allow later.
then when happy of a secure large % FULL validation by the network, the pools then and only then vote, due to being happy with the usernode adoption. and if pools reach the high percentage, then it activates. knowing the network is high majority fully validating
The problem is that nodes are anonymous and cannot be detected. We could add some system where they publish their agreement, but it would only work for new nodes, not the old ones which are just as important. (Note that listening nodes are not all nodes.)

phase one: users(full nodes)
a year is given for getting to 95%, when/if it is at 95% at any time within the year..(a)
a month is then given to ensure it stays at 95%, incase of temporary fluke/sybil attack etc(b)
and then a months grace(c)
95% is not consensus sufficient for a hardfork. The remaining 5% would continue Bitcoin and the 95% would simply leave into an altcoin.

please note:
the time between (b) and (f), ends up being many many months. meaning alot of time is given for the ~270 lingering user nodes to well surpass the 95%
thus only making the orphan risk well under 5%.
That's assuming those lingering nodes are actually lingering, and not actively objecting. If they are objecting, then they cannot be forced to switch.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / PSA: Miners SHOULD NOT signal segwit if the community is not in widespread agre on: November 20, 2016, 02:29:52 AM
Softforks require community support, and miners should evaluate this before signalling activation of them. If the community is significantly divided over whether a softfork should be deployed, miners should not signal support for the softfork until this contention is resolved.

Bitcoin Core and [segwit-capable] derivatives by default will indicate to segwit-enabled miners that they should signal for segwit support, but GBT's versionbits support (see BIP 9) is intentionally designed such that the miner may safely choose to ignore this recommendation and omit the signal - Core does not force anyone to signal segwit. Miners and pools should choose whether to signal for segwit (and other softforks or policy decisions) on their own, and not rely on defaults.

People using stratum mining pools should note that they may not be able to override the pools' decisions. If your pool does not disclose to you whether they signal for a given softfork, or they signal (or don't-signal) for one inappropriately, you should switch to a pool that matches your position.

Note that I am intentionally not saying whether or not segwit actually is controversial here. Personally, I support segwit and think the only rational objection is that the block size limit increase may be unsafe if we cannot trust miners to continue making 1 MB or smaller blocks for the near future. But the community should make their own decision (perhaps post your position here for miners to see), and miners should decide whether or not to signal based on the community's consent.
9  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: WTF? bitcoin-qt Wallet Passphrase in history??? on: November 15, 2016, 08:58:27 AM
This is fixed in Knots 0.13.1.
10  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: November 10, 2016, 05:02:03 AM
Just seems to have below posted in the wrong subforum and it needs tot be here :

Does someone has a idea on this problem :
I'm running a full node Bitcoin Core v0.13.0 (64-bit) with BFGminer 5.4.2-win64 on the same computer.
Starting as : bfgminer.exe --stratum-port=3333

I connect with 2 Antminer S1's to BFGminer ( stratum+tcp://192.168.0.xxx:3333 )

All seems working fine for the real Bitcoin network but NOT (no longer) for the testnet.
Alltrough it worked fine before and only Testnet=1 needs tot be changed in the Bitcoin.conf

BFGminer keeps complaining :
Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid.
No servers were found that could be used to get work from

If I remove Testnet=1 from the Bitcoin.conf and start again, no longer complains.


Would this has to do something with the 'versionbit 28' in use for the moment on the testnet ?
And if so, what can I do about it ?

Thanks for all reply's !
Kind regards.
For testnet, the RPC server is on port 18332, so you will need to provide the URI manually I think.
You will also need the segwit branch of libblkmaker.
11  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: WTF? bitcoin-qt Wallet Passphrase in history??? on: October 23, 2016, 05:08:14 AM
This issue has been assigned CVE-2016-8889 and will be fixed in the next release of Bitcoin Knots.
12  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: October 13, 2016, 09:35:17 PM
Has anyone ever made something to describe the layout(what everything means) of BFGminer?
You mean like the README file?
13  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: October 13, 2016, 04:04:19 AM
Hey quick question. Why does "sudo apt-get install bfgminer" install 5.2?
Because your distro hasn't bothered to update it since mid-2015 apparently.
14  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: October 11, 2016, 11:38:08 PM
Hello,
Is there any possibility that BFGMINER will support rx480 cards?

No reason I'm aware of that it wouldn't already.
15  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: WTF? bitcoin-qt Wallet Passphrase in history??? on: September 27, 2016, 01:28:25 AM
Code:
# eix bitcoin-qt
[I] net-p2p/bitcoin-qt
     Available versions:  0.10.2 (~)0.10.2-r1 (~)0.11.0 (~)0.11.1 (~)0.11.2 (~)0.12.0 (~)0.12.1 (~)0.13.0 **9999 {1stclassmsg bitcoin_policy_cltv bitcoin_policy_cpfp bitcoin_policy_dcmp (+)bitcoin_policy_rbf bitcoin_policy_spamfilter dbus +http kde +libevent libressl ljr +qrcode qt4 qt5 test +tor upnp +wallet xt zeromq LINGUAS="ach af af_ZA ar be_BY bg bg_BG bs ca ca@valencia ca_ES cmn cs cs_CZ cy da de el el_GR en en_GB eo es es_419 es_AR es_CL es_CO es_DO es_ES es_MX es_UY es_VE et eu_ES fa fa_IR fi fil fr fr_CA fr_FR gl gu_IN he hi_IN hr hu id_ID it it_IT ja ka kk_KZ ko_KR ku_IQ ky la lt lv_LV mk_MK mn ms_MY nb nl pam pl pt_BR pt_PT ro ro_RO ru ru_RU sah sk sl_SI sq sr sr@latin sv ta th_TH tr tr_TR uk ur_PK uz@Cyrl uz@Latn vi vi_VN zh zh_CN zh_HK zh_TW"}
     Installed versions:  0.13.0(06:14:35 PM 08/30/2016)(dbus ljr qrcode qt4 wallet -bitcoin_policy_rbf -bitcoin_policy_spamfilter -http -kde -libevent -libressl -qt5 -test -tor -upnp -zeromq LINGUAS="cs de en -af -af_ZA -ar -be_BY -bg -bg_BG -ca -ca@valencia -ca_ES -cs_CZ -cy -da -el -el_GR -en_GB -eo -es -es_AR -es_CL -es_CO -es_DO -es_ES -es_MX -es_UY -es_VE -et -eu_ES -fa -fa_IR -fi -fr -fr_CA -fr_FR -gl -he -hi_IN -hr -hu -id_ID -it -it_IT -ja -ka -kk_KZ -ko_KR -ku_IQ -ky -la -lt -lv_LV -mk_MK -mn -ms_MY -nb -nl -pam -pl -pt_BR -pt_PT -ro -ro_RO -ru -ru_RU -sk -sl_SI -sq -sr -sr@latin -sv -ta -th_TH -tr -tr_TR -uk -ur_PK -uz@Cyrl -vi -vi_VN -zh -zh_CN -zh_HK -zh_TW")
     Homepage:            http://bitcoincore.org/
This should get you Bitcoin Knots, which does have a history, but is supposed to filter out walletpassphrase stuff.

But...
unfortunately, v0.13.0.0-ga402396 (64-bit) doesn't clear the history at all.
Where are you getting that version from? That indicates Core, not Knots. :/

Please open an issue here: https://github.com/bitcoinknots/bitcoin/issues
16  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 1000 BTC GIVEAWAY! From your friend rekcahxfb on: August 04, 2016, 09:05:13 PM
I see many repeated messages, and I think this is should be honest lottery so I decide that the winner will be selected from Addresses who sent 0.001 btc  to this Address: 1FvCk1jTsy7AvmnpeKnrfHSJnfX7om7fNM
Bitcoin transactions don't have a "from address".

If you will accept my entry at no cost, 12jixsyvXHrKPwWj8XcmvuFYyJzsWpPKAN
17  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: July 25, 2016, 02:38:51 PM
You could try increasing the queue size with the -Q option.
18  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: July 25, 2016, 02:21:08 AM
getwork doesn't perform very well since it needs to make a new request for every 4 Gh... so with a S5 that's almost 300 requests per second.
19  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: July 19, 2016, 10:29:54 PM
No, antminer S* use an ugly hack of a custom kernel module.
There is nothing USB about them.
20  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: BFGMiner 5.4.2: GBT+Stratum, RPC, Mac/Linux/Win64, Antminer S1-S5, solo stratum on: July 19, 2016, 09:54:21 PM
Looks like it's simply not getting a response from the kernel driver.
Anyone happen to know which kernel driver code the S3 uses?
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 ... 244 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!