this coin still alive?  kinda have the feeling hybernation is almost over Man I had the same feeling about you where were you, you were a very active member of this community anyway PM me with your addresses and I'll get you back in cause you well deserve this  |
|
|
|
For Newcommers to Duality  Files will be updated weekly |
|
|
|
For Newcommers to Duality Files will be updated weekly |
|
|
|
I also hope in this project. I wish good luck to the developers.
Thanks mate feel free to join us |
|
|
|
This will fix the bug when starting and sync the wallet its not a patch , its an fixed version , just replace the binaries for self build , build again from master branch For Dynodes VPS ---If you have servers that are not starting because of the bug, reinstall the server as well with the new binaries |
|
|
|
|
we will in the future
you can find more info on our discord
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, it's much better to spread the hash over multiple pools
|
|
|
|
If you keep calling people idiots when they try to help, you won't get too much, help for sureI'm sure that you are a clever wise man being in the crypto world for ages now, and you did save the privkeys of your wallet as any of us idiots will do, so you can recover your wallet cause if you're talking about
It is money and wallet not work.
 you're on the wrong site mate, this is crypto  When you figure out everything, ask yourself this question: why all the idiots out there can solve this and you're the only genius that can't? PS also the same idiot that is trying to help will ask you again which wallet? did you do the steps indicated?
|
|
|
|
|
If you guys are talking about the DYN wallet, that bug when starting the wallet it's been looked into right now
The way around it is to delete dncache.dat from your data directory
usually in C:\Users\*****\AppData\Roaming\Dynamic
then restart the wallet
if you see a progress to for example 94% then exit the wallet by pressing Ctrl-Q, this way it will save your progress
restart the wallet and you may need to exit again at 96% and 98%
after that will work as normal
I had to restart twice
sorry about that, the devs are looking into it as we speak
|
|
|
|
|
which one? SEQ or DYN wallet?
|
|
|
|
For Newcommers to Duality Files will be updated weekly |
|
|
|
Update from devs
 Sequence 1.2 is undergoing testing- fixes to UI, for when you send SEQ and it doesn't show the fee
- updates leveldb to 1.20
- fixes decimals to show 8 places
- updates to the new logos/icons
- removes multisig ui
- updates all copyrights
- increases fee for splitblock as it was too low
- as well as many others which will be announced once binaries are released  We are also in the middle of growing our development team across all aspects of the project for Website/Platform, Wallet/Mobile Wallets, API's and a BaaS dev team. If anyone has interest or skills that they believe would be of benefit to the project, please do get in touch via email:  s.lievens@duality.solutions |
|
|
|
This was discussed already on our discord atm its only a person with an huge amount of miners, nothing more
seems network hash back normal
botnet or no, It was aws The increase in hash is good, someone is investing effort into the coin,
coins get more sparse and the price will follow...
Thus rise, thus for everybody who doesn't want to get rich quick, this is a good thing...
Please do let the coin rise in toughness,
Nobody will pay 10k for BTC if you could get them for 50 cents by mining....
Basic economics, ask and supply. Reduce supply to compensate at the ask part. |
|
|
|
 aquafredaNice to hear from you mate, hope you're doing well and still riding the tides of crypto world yes good memories, but life goes on and we moved on and we're getting better with time about the wallet on Ubuntu, don't know too much cause I'm a win user, but just go to https://github.com/duality-solutions/Sequence and follow instructions more info in doc folder or join our discord channel and ask questions there and the wizards will get you through any problems Visit us and ask any question on Discord
 don't hesitate cause pretty soon we'll have this  anyway if you decide to stick around you'll find loads of old pals there on discord, with different nicknames maybe and I'll send you a welcome package that you definitely deserve  |
|
|
|
DYN can only be mined with CPU Quote: author= LordDarkHelmet#2293 on Discord Duality community] Beastpool vs Solo Mining Update 2 Mining DYN with AVX-512 capable chips:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVX-512About the test: Mirrored tests on dedicated machines were run in parallel over several days to compare like results. The test used 256 AVX-512 compatible cores dedicated to each miner for the duration of the test. Network hash rate was normalized down to 5-minute increments. Rewards were used only to verify the validity of the displayed hash rate. The validated and normalized hash rate was then used to calculate the expected reward. The payments from the pool was within the acceptable margin of error based on the calculated expected reward and fee. Conclusion:beastpool.com , offers a clear advantage over the native wallet miner for AVX-512 capable chips. Mining with Beastpool with the current 1% fee will yield about 12% more than the native miner on AVX-512 compatible chips. If you have an AVX-512 compatible CPU, I recommend mining with Beastpool. Thank you Robert HoppenfeldCheck this for mining performance:  |
|
|
|
Update from devs
Dynamic 2.3 is still undergoing work and having functionality from Syscoin ported over in terms of its certificate/asset/escrow system, however, this isn't for a decentralised marketplace when it comes to Dynamic, this is for identity/certification and will be utilised for BaaS purposes, much alike the dDNS in Sequence is used for verification of identity against a transaction ID/address but with much more depth. Because our use case is different to that of Syscoin, we will be making amendments to their code, as well actually updating it to work with the newer code we have in Dynamic from Bitcoin (remember we are basically in-line with Bitcoin minus Segwit). Sequence 1.2 is also underway and many fixes are being carried out, however, the long term plan with Sequence will be a coin swap to a much improved codebase and blockchain. This will bring a much more stable PoS algorithm and staking experience, as well as more features. Sequence 1.2 is being worked on to effectively improve the user experience during the interim between 1.2's release and the coin swap a few months later on down the road. We are also in the middle of growing our development team across all aspects of the project for Website/Platform, Wallet/Mobile Wallets, API's and a BaaS dev team. If anyone has interest or skills that they believe would be of benefit to the project, please do get in touch via email: s.lievens@duality.solutionsThere has been a lot of legal hoops that we have been required to jump through and continue to jump through, but we are conforming and providing all that is being asked from us by relevant parties. These requirements, as we are sure you are all aware, are required and the sooner we provide these things, the sooner we can progress. 2018 is a real year of growth for the project. The same as 2017 was, it will be exciting |
|
|
|
Quote: @LordDarkHelmet#2293 on Discord Duality communityLong run:
In the long run, luck is not a relevant factor. Basically on average every hash is going to give you some return. This is the same for pools and solo mining. Here is the problem. The pool has a fee, which reduces your overall return. In addition the pool is not 100% efficient. To reduce fraud, pools send out the same task to more than one miner. This overhead further reduces the efficiency of the pool and the associated return. The end result is that pools are not as profitable in the long run.
Short run:
In the short run pools are more profitable. Let's say you only mine for 1 second.
The likelihood of solo mining a coin is very low, but you can at least get something out if the pool.
The next question is when is solo mining more profitable than pool mining?
To answer this question we are also going to take luck out of the equation.
Given: The net hash rate is 10,000kh/s
Given: Your mining rig does 10kh/s
Given: 500 coins mined per day
(Yes I am using simple numbers to make the example simple, you can plug in the actual numbers)
((Net hash)/(your hash))/(hash per time period)=(time it takes to earn a reward)
((10000)/(10))/(500)=2 days
The code compiled for the pool does not support AVX512, as a result the rate was significantly less than the native wallet's hash rate.
Basically if your CPU supports AVX512 instructions, the pool is a non starter until they upgrade their capability.
We know that pools are less efficient so in our example it is more efficient to run a solo miner if you mine for a little less than 2 days or more.
For DYN it is actually less than 2 days because the reward amount is 675 a day (going from memory). For BTC it is in the years or decades depending and therefore pools are viewed as better for BTC. Thank you Robert HoppenfeldDYN can only be mined with CPU Check this for mining performance: |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
