Je trouve que là où ils sont forts c'est d'avoir trouvé l'adresse ledger.net étonnant que Ledger eux-mêmes n'ont pas cette adresse ! évidemment c'est du pishing faites gaffe Faut croire qu'ils ont été plus rapides que Ledger pour renouveler le domaine Name: LEDGER.NET Registry Domain ID: 74217512_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN Updated: 2024-09-24 14:54:18 UTC
|
|
|
Disons ... et comment on feraient si ils interdisaient effectivement le cash ? Je me pose la même question quand je suis dans des pays où il y a en permanence des pannes de courant.
|
|
|
We’re gearing up for a unique BTC marketing campaign aimed at showcasing the true power and utility of Bitcoin. To make this campaign truly impactful, we’re looking for old wallets—active or inactive—where you still have access to the private keys. If you have a wallet that’s been gathering dust but that you still control, we’d love to collaborate!
Here’s the deal: If you’re willing to let us use your wallet in our campaign, we’ll ensure that it’s a win-win! Not only will your wallet get some love and attention, but you’ll also be directly contributing to bringing more awareness and usage to BTC in the wider community.
Lol! Are you trolling? Why would I share my private keys with anyone? My wallet doesn't need love nor attention, it only needs more satoshis.
|
|
|
Hello, I 've been recently promoting multiple "non-paid" signatures, to support good services and products.
I am transitioning to this service now!
Good luck!
Welcome! Thank you for supporting the campaign!
|
|
|
C'est un HDD? Quoi comme RAM? Le mieux pour le hardware c'est SSD + maximum de RAM. Ce post pourra peut-être t'aider : Bitcoin blockchain sync very slow on HDDCPU and net usage stay low most of the time, problem is not there (most likely). HDD usage is constant, I think that's probably the bottleneck. It's a 7200rpm standard desktop HDD. You have 2 bottlenecks: RAM, and HDD speed. Both are more or less interchangeable: with 32 GB RAM and 12000 MB dbcache, your sync will go just fine. With 8 GB RAM and an SSD, the SSD is still the bottleneck. I tested both of these examples myself. 10 years ago I could sync the blockchain on a slow 5400rpm laptop HDD without major issues. Ten years ago, the entire blockchain was only 20 GB. Does syncing get harder over time as the blockchain gets longer? Yes. The chainstate directory keeps growing, and requires more and more RAM (or a LOT of disk activity) to verify the download. Or has the code quality of Bitcoin Core gone down? Nope. Older versions were much slower to sync. Syncing monero is also extremely slow and it has been so as long as I can remember. But that's another story. Monero is even more demanding than Bitcoin Core, despite a much smaller blockchain. TL;DR: get an SSD. If you have a small SSD, put the chainstate directory on it. That will make a huge difference for Bitcoin Core. If you don't have an SSD yet, buy one. Get a decent one for best performance. It's going to largely improve your entire computing experience.
|
|
|
Hey guys, As NiceHack is a no-go for me due to KYC, im going to use Mining Rig Rentals again. I cant seem to get it working to CK pool. Anyone can share their port/address/diff. if you got it working. Thanks!
https://oshi.at/MTqL/tWsn.png
|
|
|
Hi paid2,
I would like to promote this campaign,
Btc Address:
bc1q7advjsg5a6kthpxn36fe0tyyzq6wl977pl3g35
Welcome! Thank you for promoting OrangeFren!
|
|
|
We have a winner! Congrats to owlcatz! You won the Custom eXch Cryptosteel Capsule #21. I will send you a PM later (edit: still an issue with forum's proxy, link of the image: https://oshi.at/nsgT) 25 - owlcatz 29 - owlcatz Thanks again! Thank you everyone for participating and many thanks to eXch and to icopress for this raffle!
|
|
|
We will go with block #869330 You can check the draw here. Good luck!
|
|
|
The raffle is full! We will do the draw later today
|
|
|
One last slot available friends!
|
|
|
That is what we want to fix, and we would not call these exchangers the worst of the worst as if you study their social networks and reviews they are one of the most popular exchangers. It's better to look up to them than to an exchanger involved in laundering illegal funds, which you are advertising! LOL! How pathetic to attack eXch because it's in my signature, on top of that with false accusations! All this from someone who is doing illegal things (as mentioned in my previous messages) lol! FixedFloat should have spent more on security and probably less on advertising perhaps. How many more times are they going to get hacked? By the way, they are involved in a lot of money laundering, 1 , 2 , 3 (these are just a few examples of many other cases where FixedFloat have laundered stolen funds) https://oshi.at/XdyY/kDuW.png https://oshi.at/hzWM/FEwo.pngAnd this without even mentioning how many users FixedFloat scammed by freezing funds illegally with users being unable to sue them because FixedFloat never disclosed their legal entity. Changelly is not better, they're stealing a lot of their users: ⚠️⚠️ 300M+ Ongoing Biggest Crypto Scam LEAK [Changelly & Freewallet and more] ⚠️or If you search this exchange before, you'll see a bunch of thread have discussed against this scam exchange. Changelly have multiple scam accusations and only solve a few cases.
Feel free to take example from the worst of the worst. At the same time, eXch has been irreproachable for years
In any case, who's going to give credibility to someone who wants to run an exchange, but doesn't understand what non-custodial / custodial means, or who's capable of writing messages like that? You should stop posting or try to find someone competent to do it, your messages show each time a little more that you don't know what you're talking about. Which is a shame when you bank everything on your online reputation...
|
|
|
Par ailleurs, Trump bénéficie à présent de l'onction du suffrage universel. Donc il faut le juger sur ce qu'il va faire, pas sur petites phrases ou frasques du passé que le peuple lui a pardonnées en l'élisant.
J'espère que tu tiendrais le même discours si Harris avait été élue
|
|
|
I think now is the time to remove services that have been offline for several months. It's obvious, it's not a temporary break and it won't come back. If, for any reason, there is a need for such services to continue to be listed, there should probably be a special category for such services, graveyard or similar.
Yes for the idea of a graveyard, even if "offline" status is already enough IMO (talking about special category). But in the meantime I think it would be a mistake to completely remove links from offline services, as this lets users know that a service is not accessible and can avoid them falling into the trap of phishing copies.
|
|
|
Is it bad that the project has a lot of plans)? As you can see we are actively developing and listening to users, the registration of the company is a very long process most likely we will wait for the next tax year, in addition from 2025 comes a new package of MICO regulations, which will require us to maintain an office, as well as the authorized capital of 125 thousand dollars, at the moment our company has no profit as we all reinvest, so under the jurisdiction of many countries we can forgive it, we also personally do not keep the funds of clients, and are only a convenient agent. MICO regulations? You mean "MiCA"? Are you based in EU or do you plan to be regulated in EU? Why would you bother to respect MiCA regulations if you are already not respecting basic EU GDPR and laws? The fact that we work through the exchange like 95% of exchangers does not prevent us from being a good service, all KYC obligations we assume, I do not quite understand your claim that we do not have a license if even guys like Fixed Fload, Shangely do not have one. As I said on the other forum, you have no legitimacy to ask your users for legal and personal documents without being a registered company. Its not because you decided to take example on the worst of the worst in the industry (aka FixedFloat and Changelly) that this is the right thing to do.
|
|
|
Welcome to Bitcointalk! It's always nice to see new privacy-oriented services emerging.
I'm just wondering, after reading your whitepaper, if you can clarify what do you mean exactly with “non-custodial protocol/service”? I mean, how your service differs from what eXch or Godex already propose? What you describe in this whitepaper seems to be a similar process to theirs, or similar to what any other centralized custodial exchange is doing. If we take the example of a BTC - XMR swap, the user has to send his funds to your generated address, and then you send the XMR on user's address, right? How is it non-custodial?
Hope to hear back from you!
|
|
|
5 slots left
|
|
|
7 slots left! The raffle is updated up to this post
|
|
|
20- XMRfamily
20 is not available, please take any other free spot
Only 14 free slots left
|
|
|
|