Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
|
A well packaged scam will always hit the nail on the head.
Still I'd call all those who fell for this idiots.
The sole reason why crypto isn't meant for everyone ia because of people like this who fall for anything simply because they don't know what is right and what's wrong.
I know the official link of my hardware wallet, how the hell these people don't? Its because they lack the responsibility.
|
|
|
|
|
Red Flags.
1. The internet 2. The browser. 3. The PC.
Smartness is accepting that crypto is way safer away from the internet. Smartness is accepting that open source hardware wallets are the shield in this case.
Most crypto attacks turned successful because of the access to the internet by the users, especially those that are using PC to browse. Anything Internet related should be miles away from your digital assets, keep them offline and you won't have problems like this.
|
|
|
|
|
I have cousins that want to learn a lot about Bitcoin so I am thinking of gifting them some not so real Bitcoin, I mean the Testnet Bitcoin but I want to know if a Bitcoin wallet exists where two people can have the wallet and start sending Bitcoin between them, which Bitcoin wallet is best for this?..
Does Bitcoin has a specific wallet for Testnet purpose only?
|
|
|
|
|
Bro must have forgotten that he is a human after all, sitting on millions since 2012 and keep living life like its nothing is a cruel way to live life when you know that you have no unlimited life. People always don't want these OGs to sell their bags because they feel like the price would dump but what if they are the OGS? Wouldn't they have sold already?
OGs have every right to sell if they want, they are humans just like us, I have never for once monitored whales bags because it makes no sense to do so, they have the right to enjoy their money and it shouldn't be tampering with my own accumulation.
|
|
|
|
Hardware wallet users are some of the most targeted people by hackers and scammers based on all the reports we see of fake emails being sent by impersonators of Trezor and Ledger. You would expect the bad guys to have some success eventually, even if they fail 99% of the time.
Hardware wallets are still very useful because they make it significantly harder for attackers to steal your funds. A malicious download on your PC is not the end of the world as long as your private keys are offline. It is still possible to be social engineered, but being aware of the warning signs will mitigate that possibility to a great extent.
Hackers really can't do a lot unless they use social engineering scams to get the coins stolen, users have to willingly give up their seed phrase and they call that a winner? Thats not a win to hackers but scammers, hackers do the hard jobs, they should be penetrating the hardware wallet security, so I won't call them hackers because obviously they hack nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
Lightning Network is what many people screams for, something that should have been on Bitcoin itself from the scratch, which is why I feel like not many people even care about the existence of LN on Bitcoin, many don't even use it, I hope that this won't end up like that Omni Network time.
Crypto exchanges can somehow makes the adoption of LN significant, all they have to do is shove it down peoples throat with some good offer or something, but I doubt that will be the case. This is still a good news let's just hope it becomes successful.
|
|
|
|
|
That's because most trading competitions are rewarded base on the volumes you trade, this is going to benefit the whales more than someone with few hundred dollars, I have joined few trading competitions in the past and the reward isn't always good enough, I have to quit trading competition because of this.
|
|
|
|
|
Years ago it will be very easy for anyone to consider sharing Bitcoin as Christmas present but today its not so easy, its just like comparing faucet with this idea, no faucet are able to run today because of the value of Bitcoin, the sender has to be extremely rich to send Bitcoin as Christmas present today, this is why it will be hard to believe anyone claiming that they sent Bitcoin to someone as Christmas gift.
|
|
|
|
|
Trust wallet was created to become a hot wallet running on smartphones, not as an extension. Metamask was created to be an extension for browsers from the beginning.
One shouldn't have left its purpose of been created to match other wallets, I believe this is the problem here, Trust wallet devs never prepared for what's coming, they should have just look into metamask security more and compare to what they have, if one in broken it should affect other wallets that are browser extensions too but in this case its just Trust wallet.
They should have just stayed a hot wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys, does using of Tor browser decrease the chances of getting your smartphone compromised in anyway? What are the benefits of running Tor on your smartphone to a crypto investor?
Someone I can't ask why is only running a Tor browser on his phone, he is older than me and I know he is into crypto investment too because I have helped him charge his phone but asking him question is like trying to break through a rock.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is not cheap, YouTubers are fine-tuning it as if Bitcoin is still cheap, I grabbed my calculator and do some maths on the money I can afford to risk on Bitcoin every month, equals to $30.
This equals to $360 in 12 months and let's say I am ready to hold for 10years to this time that's $3600 in the next ten years assuming Bitcoin don't appreciate in value, but we all know that's almost impossible.
Now even if Bitcoin did a 10x in between these ten years (might never happen) I still won't be rich. This is me, this is what I can afford to even lose if worst possible happens, to my own standard way of living I can't get rich off Bitcoin, simply because what I can afford to DCA every month seems very small.
If I can DCA same $30 in 2020 it would be a more effective result, I guess the more Bitcoin gets popular the chances of getting rich goes slower, I am a listener you are free to talk senses to me I will listen. I believe right now and the more the years passes by Bitcoin becomes more harder to get you the magical number.
|
|
|
|
|
Is it possible that a BITCOIN wallet implement mixers inside the wallet itself without the government coming for that person? I have a friend who is a genius compared to the dumb me who believe this is not a good idea, I don't want to see him get into trouble that's why I asked.
He also asked why we haven't had such capable Bitcoin wallet yet, I told him about samurai wallet and what the centralised power is making them face right now, do you think that this can land my friend into big problem or it's problem free.
|
|
|
|
While others were crying about the dip, i have been rejoicing because i made life changing money from the dip, as i did short during this time and right now i don't know if i should continue with trading or just retire to avoid market collecting it back? Help me ask people. This was from anonymous, what is your advice for him?
You expect me to believe this lie? The only people that short the market on October 10 are all insiders, even professional traders didn't saw it coming, are you an insider? Because you people are the ones responsible for that manipulation.
|
|
|
|
I have only three question to ask. (1) can I purchase Bitcoin? (2) can I store bitcoin for a particular wallet for future use? (3) is it a good advice for me to store all my life saving on Bitcoin?
1. You can purchase Bitcoin, unless something is stopping you from buying Bitcoin, my advice is don't punish yourself by buying Bitcoin with money that's intended for your school fees or house bills, make sure you invest what you can afford to invest. 2. You can't store Bitcoin on any wallet you come across, make sure you choose from the list of Non-custodial wallets available, like Electrum, Ledger, Tangem, also make sure they are open source wallets like these ones that I listed. 3. Just like what I said in the first place, buy Bitcoin when it is doable for you, if you can live without your life savings then Bitcoin is not bad as a retirement plan, if this is the route you want to choose it is wiser to store your life savings in a hardware wallet because they are more secured. Since life savings is involved, make sure you keep your recovery seed very safe, it is obvious that your life will depend on it, there should be no room for leakage or losses.
|
|
|
|
This topic may have been discussed a long time ago, but now there is a renewed interest in discussing this topic. From 2010 to the present 2025, every time Bitcoin has gone through a price correction, the world's most famous people have killed Bitcoin. From 2010 to 2025, Bitcoin has died a total of 440 times and been revived 440 times. The following people have killed Bitcoin the most. Peter Schiff 19 times Warren Buffett 8 times Steve Hanke 8 times Nouriel Roubini 8 times Jamie Dimon 7 times Paul Krugman 6 times Nicholas Weaver 6 Times Brett Arends 4 Time John Crudele 4 Times Kevin Dowd 4 times
 Peter Schiff, this gentleman kills Bitcoin whenever he gets the chance and last declared Bitcoin dead on July 28, 2025. With this, he has declared Bitcoin dead the most times, a maximum of 19 times.  They never killed Bitcoin, it is not what these people said that make Bitcoin price to come down in the past, Bitcoin was busy doing it's thing, the slow ride up and some correction, right from day one it is always a higher high for Bitcoin, that is why we never go back to old value unlike alternative coins. They did spread some FUD but things just keep getting better for Bitcoin, people who listened to such FUD will surely be angry with all of these famous people, they have missed out on the biggest opportunity of the century because famous people were suppose to know better than them. This is what happens when you are the type who follow the orders of your government, many countries placed ban on Bitcoin in the past as well, it doesn't affect me a bit because Bitcoin is decentralised, they are never going to like the idea anyway so it is expected.
|
|
|
|
Vietnam’s recent decision to delete over 86 million bank accounts underscores growing concerns over centralized control of personal finances. As biometric verification becomes mandatory, critics argue that the sweeping closures expose the vulnerability of traditional banking.
The event has sparked renewed interest in decentralized alternatives such as Bitcoin, which operates independently of government or institutional oversight.
Vietnam Deletes Millions of Accounts Under New Biometric Rules Vietnamese commercial banks began removing over 86 million bank accounts in early September 2025 after the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) enforced new biometric requirements. Authorities say the policy targets accounts lacking face or fingerprint verification and aims to curb fraud, cybercrime, and money laundering.
The country has an estimated 200 million bank accounts. Following the nationwide review, approximately 113 million remained active. Accounts flagged as inactive or not updated with biometric data faced deletion, leaving many residents scrambling to meet compliance deadlines.
Foreign residents report particular challenges. In-person identity checks are mandatory, and remote options remain limited, creating hurdles for those outside Vietnam or unable to visit branches quickly. Critics argue the measures risk excluding vulnerable groups and may disrupt legitimate financial activity.
Global Context of Sudden Account Freezes Vietnam’s sweeping action is not unique. Around the world, governments and financial institutions routinely freeze or seize funds, often without prior notice.
In China, rural bank customers in 2022 faced frozen deposits for months amid fraud investigations, prompting widespread protests. The US has long employed civil asset forfeiture, allowing law enforcement to seize assets even without a criminal conviction. In the UK, “Account Freezing Orders” empower authorities to block access when anti-money-laundering concerns arise.
This is another wake-up call for everyone reading this who is into Bitcoin but has yet to adopt the principle of not trusting third parties, which is one of the major purposes Satoshi created Bitcoin. Because you can't treat Bitcoin like a JPEG and never pay dearly sooner or later. The primary reason for creating this topic is that 86 million bank accounts in Vietnam were shut down due to biometric discrepancies, but a similar issue is also occurring in the Bitcoin space, and some people are unaware of it. I could remember years ago when CoinBase introduced a tough KYC procedure, and all the users of the exchange who cant comply with or execute the harsh KYC cant access their funds. As Bitcoin is now mainstream, we need to prioritize the use of a self custodial wallet. I am wondering how the banks will get the job done since they are looking forward to accepting and safe keeping Bitcoin for their customers, it is not hidden that some banks hired crazy workers that will ruin your day when you needed help the most, some of them turned their banking job into their private business as if they own the banks, they will lay stupid command on you and you are to follow if you want to access your account, imagine someone telling you what to do after keeping your BTC in their hands. There is never going to be an offer rendered to me as a bank user that will make me surrender my Bitcoin to the banks, not in this life time, those people are so weird and wicked, I am talking from experience, I had a uncle who was sick and we had to admit him in a hospital and I had some bills to clear, I got to the bank and explained everything to the cashier that it is an emergency, this crazy bitch told me to go back and queue at the back of almost 30 people, after waiting for an hour I smartly find the bank manager and told him everything, thank God he is a good man, he hasten the whole thing up for my uncles sake. The command on my own money, the rules on my own money is why I can't stand the banks, maybe the experience is different in other countries but it is worse over here, I will never deposit my Bitcoin into my bank account.
|
|
|
|
|
Here are 7 Bitcoin related questions that I have been thinking to ask the legendary and OG members of this forum.
1. What are people using address prefix finder for?
2. Can I lose my BTC if I don't upgrade the software always?
3. Can I make money running Bitcoin node?
4. Now that there is ongoing massive adoption for Bitcoin, if everyone holding including the government how will scarcity plays out without a price ceiling?
5. Can Bitcoin function offline without the Internet?
6. Can Bitcoin maintain it's full decentralisation and security while making more than 10 transactions?
7. If Bitcoin can't fully decentralized from the government haven't the decentralisation failed?
|
|
|
|
The main reason everyone can not be rich is because of the lack of knowledge and exposure to what can make them become rich.
If everyone is rich, life can not be balanced, but it is not good to be poor. Some people are poor because they lack education.
Knowledge, education and exposure are very important.
If God intentionally make every thing easy to get, the word "value" will be meaningless, even Gold will be used as a brick for building a house just because of it's shiny color, everything that has value comes with a price, you need knowledge to acquire them and not everyone has that knowledge. I believe that God intentionally make things like this to that there will be balance in life, many people hate it when I say that some people are born to feed off the hands of the rich, it is just the way it is, while some are born to become the hand that feeds the needy, even our fingers are not equal. Poor has it's advantages also while having it all have it's disadvantage, there is nothing that's created in the world that's completely out of perfection, there are always flaws to everything.
|
|
|
|
|