|
901
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: [ANN] Official Litecoin shared domain litecoin.net
|
on: July 28, 2012, 01:13:58 AM
|
Here you go: http://troll.litecoin.netbitlane, I previously enjoyed your posts. That is until you started trolling really hard. I may have to put you on ignore. Well, in all fairness, I do not instigate or initiate..... I simply react and/or respond. If referring to me as a ' moron' in your earlier reply to me has had it's desired effect, I commend you for your efforts. If in fact you would rather NOT make this personal, then I would also be open to discussing this further. Thank you for your time, bitlane. |
|
|
|
|
903
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bounty to dox BitcoinEXpress
|
on: July 28, 2012, 01:04:24 AM
|
Sorry but I haven't been hiding, I've had you on ignore for four days LOLRemember I told you and posted the sceen shot?  ?? So what is it that you want? Please speak in complete sentences or have some do it for you. ~BCX~ I will be more than happy to reply using complete sentences, if only you can agree to getting a better handle on punctuation and grammar. Sincerely, ~bitlane~ |
|
|
|
|
910
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Coblee shows intent to promote Litecoin centralization
|
on: July 27, 2012, 11:48:50 PM
|
[1:42] <coblee> i wish i could prune the blockchain of all the transaction spam though We can see here Coblee is promoting centralization by wanting to remove the block chain spam in Litecoin.The fate of Litecoin is self-explanatory. Perhaps Coblee is losing fate his "Liecoin" can meet up to the challenge. Just because I WISH I WAS A TEAPOT....it doesn't mean that I AM one. Pull your head out of your ass and wake up. Don't you have some coding on MicroSCAM to complete ? May Launch ? ....like, May 2015 ? < EDIT> ..Although, you could very well be a BlowHardEXpress sock puppet account, so I will try to be at least 51% nicer in my next response to your stupidity. |
|
|
|
|
911
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Bounty to dox BitcoinEXpress
|
on: July 27, 2012, 11:24:49 PM
|
That ship has sailed. I posted IT's Facebook profile a couple days ago and now it seems IT has seen fit to remove IT's work info and timeline from it...
Pretty much confirms it's him then. What a loser!  It's also been 8 hours since IT has signed into the BlowHardEXpress forum account. Considering the time IT spends on this forum, the only conclusions I can come to at this point are:1) It's dead. 2) It's using one of it's sock puppet accounts. 3) It's been online, but signed out of it's main account so that we can not see ' Last Active' times and it can hide in shame. ...and YES. I beat Dead Horses. I will not give up as easily as IT seems to have. |
|
|
|
|
914
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 27, 2012, 08:28:51 PM
|
|
Well, considering BlowHardEXpress hasn't been online using IT's main identity for the past 5 hours, I would bet that there is a sock puppet account (or 2, or 3) of IT's getting a good workout right now, while IT stays in hiding....
ZERO CREDIBILITY.....although my opinion of IT hasn't changed, so it's not a far stretch for me.
What an idiot.
Work History removed from Facebook, Recent Silence, combined with the Back Peddling leads me to believe what I knew all along.
I just want to say THANK YOU to the aptly named BlowHardEXpress for making the last few days enjoyable for me.
~bitlane~
|
|
|
|
|
917
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 27, 2012, 04:30:31 AM
|
My goal isn't to destroy Litecoin,
My goal has been clear from the start, to perform a successful 51% attack and nothing more.
QUIT WITH THE BACK PEDDLING..... The attack will last for several days and after a couple of resets, I intend to drive the difficulty to all time highs, then simply quit. NMC hell all over again.
No coin that has been 51% attacked has ever recovered it confidence level.
~BCX~
I guess an attempt to destroy confidence is not the same as an attempt to simply destroy..... YOU FUCKING TOOLBOX. You have earned the name BlowHardEXpress.... Can you honestly not even keep your own posts straight ? or do you have too many sock puppet accounts under your control, that seem to be causing confusion for you ? Bottom line is this people,
When I successfully 51% LTC, regardless if you reset it or not.
Confidence will be broken, LTC will be dead.
So I suggest you all start solo mining in vain so I can laugh that much harder.
~BCX~
|
|
|
|
|
918
|
Other / Archival / Re: deleted
|
on: July 27, 2012, 02:36:56 AM
|
Isn't it enough to just agree on one node to trust? If you then detect a fork, either stop processing and raise an alarm or go with the trusted node.
The one thing all of this has done so far is really expose the vulnerability of LTC and alt chains to 51% attacks. In it's current form, LTC will never be secure as this will always be a possibility. No security equals no future. Even Bitcoin itself is vulnerable. I am seeing multiple comments about how LTC needs 51% protection by validating transactions from the authentic chain only. They're being called, drumroll.... "trust nodes. LTC Trustnodes...has a familiar ring. I have ran into the concept before of a node having the only purpose of authenticating transactions to stop 51% attacks. Was Coinhunter simply ahead of his time and correct all along? ~BCX~ Nice back peddle...RETARD. NOW, get your pathetic shit together and get this party started. You already missed out on a free pair of deluxe Fake Tities, at my expense. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=95903.0I applaud you for being such a credit to this community and know that until YOU either QUIT or OPEN A NEW ACCOUNT, I will put you do here under as much scrutiny as possible and show you what a war of attrition is really all about. ....Fucking Blow Hard. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
