I'm going to make my last comment on the subject, and I'll probably stop using this alt as well.

What is clear is that many of you here know who is behind this alt, and you hide it for a very simple reason: MONEY.

You are involved in one way or another with the project and you know that if you say who is behind it, potential investors will not like it.

The answers I have seen here have made me change my mind about many of you.


Creating an alt to raise 7BTC without saying which disreputable person is behind it doesn't seem like an abuse to you?

I don't know if you are referring to me, although I understand you don't, as I think BitcoinGirl.Club refers to other accounts. In my case, yes, I am an alt. I created this account because I already have an account on the forum and I thought about making a second one, as many people have. In the future I might say which is my main account, or maybe not, or maybe I won't get very far because I'm not sure I have time to manage two accounts, combining them with my daily activities. In any case, I am not obliged to say so.

Yesterday I was looking for a thread of interest to comment on and I saw the other one about Bitlucy.

I have nothing against Royse777, but after what has been said, I think the following:

1. I think it is more likely to be Royse777 who is behind the Casino Critique account than Darkstar_, as explained in the other thread.

2. Without more data, we cannot be sure. I think the OP is probably a shitposter who was tagged by Royse777 and that's why he talks like that.

3. The two escrows know who is behind this account.

4. If it's Royse777, dkbit98 knows it too and in this case what he has written in this thread would be completely dishonest. The fact that he talks about balls, pussy and conspiracy theories, without clearly stating that it is not Royse777 who is behind the account makes me think even more strongly that it is him.

5. If it's Royse777 and some people on the forum know about it, I don't think it's honest for them to hide it. I understand that after what happened, they want to give him a second chance, but we are talking about a lot of money here. The reason for not saying who is behind it is clear, many people will think twice if someone who was involved with Bitlucy is behind the project, no matter how much the community has forgiven him.

This last point applies, even if the person behind the account is not Royse777. Most likely it is someone who has had reputation problems on the forum, and therefore does not use his main account or does not make it clear, either with a neutral tag or by explicitly saying so, that it is that person who is behind it. Hiding this is not honest with potential investors.

It would, but if DarkStar_ was managing Casino Critique's account everyone would know it's him who is behind it. Either the account would have a neutral tag indicating this or it would be clearly stated in the thread. Not taking advantage of the impeccable reputation would be stupid, like shooting yourself in the foot.

We can't be sure of anything, but the question is who is behind the Casino Critique account.

If he were someone of impeccable reputation, like DarkStar_, he would use his main account to promote the project, not a newly created one.