I guess you are an alt account of MrCrank?
Absolutely not, I don't know who he is but I know that he created new account with the name of Onenuts and still managing compaign with new Account
Since at first it looks like you were only the bounty manager there, stopped bounty campaign upon discovering plagiarism and didn't have previous tags for something else, I will look into it a little bit further and if everything checks out I might change negative to neutral.
If both matters are the same then I think there should be justice. I have no personal enmity with anybody
OP, first tell you this is in the wrong place, it should be in the Reputation section, you can move the thread yourself, but I will report it to be moved.
Thanks it's already moved before my action. I think your report did work.
I will analyze the case better after this but in general, Royse777 is a person who has been on the forum for a long time and with his signature campaigns has handed out a lot of money, and still continues to do so. Red tagging him, usually closes the doors to work with him, so people are more reluctant. Plus he has a group of friends on the forum who believe in him no matter what.
I am thinking Same about Mr crank. At the time when he was tagged he was launching most altcoin bounties other than any manager and most the reward was escrowed there. Even Ukan( Pilgrized Whitepaper) has been paid to hunters for their half work. This negative tag closed the door for him. You can check his profile that how much altcoin he managed. I respected both but rules should be same for all
I,ll definitely take a look at it now. My thoughts are that any bounty manager should always do their own research before promoting a project. If they continue to actively promote a project despite clear indications that it's a scam, then they should be held accountable.
What will you say about your action against Mr Crank
You did not wait for one day. He clearly said that he will clarify everything tomorrow but you flagged him and here in this case you are bid silent .
So am I right in my understanding that the main wrongdoing here is the plagiarized whitepaper? That's certainly wrong to do and doesn't reflect well on the integrity of whoever's behind the project, but that doesn't say much about how legit MetaMallVerse is or to what extent Royse777's reputation ought to be sullied.
I don't condone plagiarism by any means, but correct me if I'm wrong: it's a thing that's accepted in certain parts of the world, something that people wouldn't think twice about and certainly wouldn't believe it would cause problems (especially if those people were young and/or naive). We've seen it happen so many times with ICOs that I can't imagine project owners would continue plagiarizing if they knew they'd be held to task for it.
I think it will not work. Here is another example if Qi Blockchain Project Which Whitepaper was Plagiarized. Even this project token is now listed in two big exchanges XT(No 2 in volume) and bitmart exchange and still project alive but compaign manager Jawadu has been tagged for running compaign
Here is the Qi Blockchain Pilgrized Detail I don't see why OP is making a fuss because he hasn't been tagged.
I want justice. I think in this matter Legendary and newbie should Be treated equally.
Account created yesterday is already familiar with the happenings in the forum? Lol.! I am not surprise thou but the hate game is obvious in your post. Royse 777 is a reputable manager and he already announced the suspension of the ongoing round two bounty. I believe that perhaps he was not aware of the plagiarism accusation. I don't know what seeing him tagged will earn you.
I am really sorry for Royse777. I wished that it was anybody other than Royse but we should do our work. I will be more happy if Mr crank tagged change to neuterel because he had been also stopped bounty while Jawadu didn't.
Show Posts
