 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »
|
Only 8k away from a 90k Supernode. Can we expect a MN setup script before the 12th when public RTA goes live? Im wondering how this works on a wallet as strange as the GRAFT wallet. Ive only even set up nodes on QT wallets. Any early tips or advice would be greatly appreciated.
a tutorial would be nice. |
|
|
|
Our project will allow you to transfer a crypto to fiat. Yes, we also need a singular token that amalgamates the average exchange values of all public assets into a single unchanged "true" value, dealing with fluctuations in economics without changing the rate at which all assets are evaluated in relation with the constant. (In other words, an 83% change in asset value is represented this way by a 0.0083% change in value with the token, curbing all economic movement into a singular basis for conversion.) $ BTC$GR@FT$ BTC$ |
|
|
|
|
I urge everyone involved in the market to be fair and conducive to healthy economic growth.
$BTC$GR@FT$BTC$
|
|
|
|
...POS payments firm Verifone is to be acquired by private equity outfit Francisco Partners for $3.4 billion in cash.
Any news how the relation with graft will be? What if they end with graft partnership? If you look at Verifone stock from April 10 2018, the difference in stock price was apparent; rising from 15$ per share to roughly 23$. The price per share of stock has not been altered dramatically since and it leads one to assume that this represents a backbone in securities for their development partners at Graft.Network.  |
|
|
|
Several of my close friends and I would like to know whether or not the rumor of a 'push-and-play' staking feature will be developed as a part of the wallet; is this accurate? $ BTC$GR@FT$ BTC$ |
|
|
|
Regarding the unsold coins in the ICO, what about selling them? What will happen to the coins if they aren't sold now? will they get burned?
again, my assumption is that they're being postmarked for sale, but only near the ICO price or at a price that benefits the market in a sense that would facilitate the natural flow of sales at some point when this would be effective. |
|
|
|
Still researching but imo great project and completely underrated compared to other projects. Great price to get in big time, hope to see this levels a bit longer to accumulate even more. If they get shit done they might make it real big and me a rich motherfucker  jokes aside, great project with great potential. Never understand ico gamblers that hope for instant 10x. Just dump on me weak boys in truth, i've kept low income investors in mind from the beginning. $$$GR@FT$$$ |
|
|
|
Since I bought never looked back at prices because market's conditions but now seeing Graft mentioned in other instant payment processors threads decide to come back to have a look again on the status. Work on opening of new markets is not satisfactory as holder I will express my concern because liquidity and easy access on more exchanges make ultimate difference in any token's adoption.
that's right, I'm told consistently, that despite the use case for this project (which is several times more comprehensive than any other) unless it gets listed on Bitmex or Bitfinex, it basically doesn't mean anything and that entire scores of investors won't even look at it. there is a real concern with it however in that the registration fees for these exchanges are costly and even the large sums taken from the ICO wouldn't have been considered to cover expenses like this on the project. The development team has evidently decided to take some time in order to smooth things out and ensure that things work properly. The being that this project is open source, the coins and software have been in circulation well before the actual programming is finished in any respect whatever. |
|
|
|
Guys that took both my and your money, screwed us with ICO (and I mean it was literally ripoff) didn't do ANYTHING to protect our investments...
Excuse me... They have offered you 2bil max coin cap coin for $0.70 per coin on an ICO. And you have expected to make instant profit out of it... Nobody forced you to buy, how can you call it a ripoff? 1. they did nothing to protect our investment from miners dumping 2. they promised refunds for their mistake (from points 1.) and didnt keep the word GRAFT is now worth 0.01 USD. It won't go to ico price EVER again. The issue has since been resolved. No great investments have been involved yet. Before the end of several years, the price will be on it's way up. Regardless of YOUR poor investment with an uncertain ICO investment (which i assume was rather just the funding necessary to actually do anything at all on this project) there is plenty of opportunity inherent to THIS project, which is the only comprehensive project that allows for mainstay crypto involvement in all areas of daily and specialty commerce. |
|
|
|
Guys that took both my and your money, screwed us with ICO (and I mean it was literally ripoff) didn't do ANYTHING to protect our investments...
Excuse me... They have offered you 2bil max coin cap coin for $0.70 per coin on an ICO. And you have expected to make instant profit out of it... Nobody forced you to buy, how can you call it a ripoff? 1. they did nothing to protect our investment from miners dumping 2. they promised refunds for their mistake (from points 1.) and didnt keep the word GRAFT is now worth 0.01 USD. It won't go to ico price EVER again. 1. They are working on the full implementation to make miners dumping meaningless... $12K dumping a day is no volume 2. It was indeed silly to promise you refunds for your incorrectly priced investment- but you have agreed the price on purchase Well it should recover to ICO prices. If Verifone takes this thing on, this will be a blast-off it's already clear that they may, and the initial money grab after GRFT hit the actual exchange (which is when smart money gets involved) represented a clear compound of interest in the project. This project began in the height of a bear market, many of the complaints are about prices, which is redundant in the wake of a crash in the sector. All of the constructive complaints about user interfacing and wallet dynamics are appreciated by all of of us to help make a more user friendly model. I want my handyman to use this app in order to invest his business, and I want to see this software taken as a mainstay in Walmart before the end of twenty years. |
|
|
|
it's completely evident that the team is doing PLENTY to build an infrastructure. Don't throw around shade wherever you assume when you're ignoring clear efforts to sustain an evolving designation for application.
completely evident? - there was a video from cell phone about verifone terminal 6 months ago - there was a drawing with merchendisers - there was some interview - there was fudding Electroneum (which is pretty lame thing to do, even though I belive ETN is shitcoin). How come they didn't compare Stellite and their INSTANT transactions (literally instant, when you switch browser window, transaction is finished and your wallet balance is already updated) compared to GRAFT shitty ridicilous wallet that doesn't update balance every time and that throws "internal server error" on attempt of sending? You call that "pretty obvious"? Other projects have weekly progress updates and weekly discussions, GRAFT has ZERO. TWO MONTHS AGO they started supernode alpha testing. TWO MONTHS AGO. It is still unclear if after that comes beta, after that gama, after that zeta... untill end of time. How much do you know about progress of supernode testing? Do you have any dates? What kind of project doesn't even say at least "supernodes launch is expected in january" for example? I will tell you what kind of project - the one that is hoping to survive for as long as they can milk their cows - you and me... They had like 1 update in past 2 months "hey guys we are sooper dooper excited everything goes well" Guys that took both my and your money, screwed us with ICO (and I mean it was literally ripoff) didn't do ANYTHING to protect our investments... and they don't have 5 minutes every week to write few sentences on official channel? Just to know that they are doing SOMETHING? They took guy from telegram channel (who was often there) and put them for community manager. They didn't even have THAT. You call that COMPLETELY EVIDENT? If you don't see that this is a PROPER platform that lays the ENTIRE foundation for accepting crypto for goods and services across ALL CHANNELS then i want you to just give us every last share that you have, because it would be pointless to have any conversations with you about the project. Everything is here. + Hardware (including a MOBILE APP that my PLUMBER can use to accept DEBIT and turn into CRYPTO like it's nothing) + Fiat payout infrastructure + a certified verification with TWO PAYMENT TERMINAL COMPANIES + completely open source software (i encourage everyone whom is complaining about slow development to rewrite their own damned code) The name is even a fair warning to anyone looking for a quick turn around based on the volatility of crypt o. Don't even consider trying to take advantage of what this project can represent unless you actually support what we're all trying to do. |
|
|
|
My equipment for mining cost me $ 3,000, the net arrived now is $ 1.8 per day ... what is the profit of mining you say?)
That's exactly what I am saying. Team has screwed over EVERY possible investor they could (including miners who are mining this for past 6 months) making this project absolutely worthless, while they try to make it look they are doing something - they aren't doing absolutely anything on the project. While I was trying someone to explain WHY would anyone mine this shitcoin, they tried to tell me that I'm insane, lol. Count your investment and electricity, draw the line below and count profit. Oh wait, what profit? it's completely evident that the team is doing PLENTY to build an infrastructure. Don't throw around shade wherever you assume when you're ignoring clear efforts to sustain an evolving designation for application. |
|
|
|
FYI - this user - bisti - is continuously trolling GRAFT project on reddit and bitcointalk by providing false information in offensive form. We suspect he is employed by one of GRAFT "competitors". He/she was blocked on reddit and now already blocked on bitcointalk after we reported to moderators.
Really, I am blocked? As I already told you, I am not working with / for any competitor or any crypto project at all. But I wish I do, I would do anything to bury your scam project. Greetings from ICO buyer who got bitchslapped in the face. ico investors need merely hold on tite. its the bottom of the market and there was plenty of time to up trade and down trade for a re positioned overall holding. within three years, the price is likely to return to the ico price and everything will sort out. |
|
|
|
they changed Supernode calculator since my post was published
EDIT: they actually changed all calculations since my post was published
Now it says over 700 USD for exchange broker and number of 50 exchange brokers lol
what a joke project
where is GRAFT price calculated in this equasions?
there are several factors involved that we can assume are based entirely on estimates that concern FUTURE variables. the network now (as being that it is not live) simply doesn't support any numbers. |
|
|
|
|
I HOPE THAT THERE ARE CASHBACK OPTIONS BEING EXPLORED. I LEGITIMATELY USE WALMART SELF-CHECKOUTS AS AN ATM WHEN I SHOP.
|
|
|
|
|
AWESOME! GREAT WORK!!
$$$GR@FT$$$
|
|
|
|
This is hilarious, team obviously has zero visions and preparations about this project. One day reward will be this, next day rewards will be that. One day there is ICO airdrop, other day there is no ICO airdrop.
Preparation is half of the work, and GRAFT team failed with it badly.
of course we all saw this happening from the beginning. while the project is doing GREAT and its the product that WE ALL WANT THE MOST. there were road blocks that were not anticipated and fundamental bugs in the monero architecture that had to be outright rewritten. given the effort shown by the team, and the dedication of the community, i am satisfied with how well this project has dealt with issues as they arise. we have only high hopes for this project as the next few years are certain to show for all of the hard work involved. |
|
|
|
$$$GR@FT$$$ CHEERS TO THE GREAT WORK, ALL. |
|
|
|
As a miner and buyer of Graft I prefer not to have the airdrop, nice call !
Now we all need to know what will happen to the coins? Will they get burned? Will they keep locked? Will they be dumped?
Anyone can answer these simple questions? If the coins won't be airdroped, what use will they have?? Anyone here from official sources?? Can these questions be answered? The tokens for the airdrop was intended to be funded from the DEV`s reserve token pool. As these tokens will not be used for airdrop they will remain in the reserve pool. Thanks Hello Team, Let me start off by saying thank you for not going through with the airdrop! Although it was mere pressure from the community on the coin's price that made you rethink your plan of action, you still get a thank you. To me, you are not being proactive, rather reactive to to the market's fluctuation and GRFT's visit to the sub-penny territory. Furthermore, I have never heard of the term "DEV`s reserve token pool" ? Is this something you reserved for yourselves and structured it in the ICO from the get go? (No record of this to be found anywhere). Or, are you referring to the remaining unsold ICO coins as "DEV`s reserve token pool"? The community was loud and clear in voicing, numerous times and from many different members, that the remaining unsold ICO coins should be burnt as every project before you did. Your silence and (play it by ear) motto is not going to get you far as most would consider it shady at best! They say Trust is like a castle of sand, so hard to build and so easy to destroy! Take this quote for what its worth and please do the right thing and burn the remaining coins. Regards, Miner I think that it is in fact important to burn no less than a fourth of the coins to satisfy the community standards as well as the market and project participants. As the project itself involves a certain type of easy plug and play node system promised for the near future, I understand the need for a large supply of coins in order to reach a large market of individuals. We implore the development team to delegate and comply appropriately. |
|
|
|
|
