Dang, that was a good tactic by doge to make the minimum acceptable bid after his 0.551
BTC.
It's really up to the person running the auction but I believe doge won based on bid invalidation.
Yeah, I'm on the fence about it. The OP states "bid increment," not "minimum bid increment." To me, that means the bids must be in increments of .01 BTC (in other words, all bids must be divisible by .01 BTC), and a bid of .541 BTC doesn't qualify. (And if that's the case, then that means the previous valid bid of .54 BTC may have won the auction.)
Regardless, the last thing I want is bad blood. This is a fun and friendly auction, after all.
Congratulations, dogevisitor.
Me
We have to wait minerjones to declare the winning bid.
If we take "bid increment" as is, then a bid with a difference of 0.02, from previus bid, would be invalid too.
In that case lots of bids would be invalid here.
If I'm the winner and if I ever think on selling this set you will be the first one I will ask and the price will be my winning bid.
Show Posts
