Now I'm ask about 100% refund. Business with you not interested after all.
What you propose now? What should we post for completition?
I will close this proceedings, if two from this three things will be met (Coingecko, Etherscan, CoinMarketCap) in next ten days.
In other case - 100% refund in ETH.
From our side, the work was done and we continue to support your ERC20 token. Moreover, we give you as much time as you need to improve your project web quality to satisfy CG requirements.
But, If you will not close these proceedings in the next 10 days we keep the right to delist you forever because of your bestial attitude to all work that we provided to you.
P.S.
This is my last post in this thread. |
|
|
|
Hello guys, we completely don't agree with the blaming man!
- Ask yourself why Tokpie has already listed over 120 projects for the last 12 months and only this man is blaming us?
That doesn't matter as long as he is right about the accusation. Is it true that you couldn't provide coingecko, cmc listing? If that's true, you have broken a contract and deserve a big red flag. Please share the information exactly here. Otherwise, you are not going to help yourself. 1. Please look at the offer:
2. To pass Coingecko we provided them with trading, vol assistance, promotion, Coinpaprika, blog post, and guidance on what to do to pass Coingecko. But Coingecko doesn't accept them because of their low web/project quality.
The offer also said you will ensure coingecko listing after 24 hours your exchange list them? Where's coingecko? Why didn't you list them on coingecko? To pass Coingecko we provided them with trading, vol assistance, promotion, Coinpaprika, blog post, and guidance on what to do to pass Coingecko. But Coingecko doesn't accept them because of their low web/project quality. |
|
|
|
I have to praise the reaction to restore their trading pairs. it is much better than blackmailing and responding negatively Tons of hours were spent to provide them with agreed services. Everything was done from our side (trading, vol assistance, promotion, and guidance on what to do to pass trackers). Might be you think we should re-develop their web, find team members for them and do all other development staff. Appearing on trackers is mutual co-working. We did our part, they did not. So, what refund they are asking for now!
you still haven't given me clear answers. If you promise them listing on CMC, CoinGecko and whatever, have you done that part of the deal? Might be you think we should re-develop their web, find team members for them and do all other development staff. Appearing on trackers is mutual co-working. We did our part, they did not. So, what refund they are asking for now!
no, you don't need to fix their infrastructure, but you should pay attention when accepting similar projects. acceptance of everything only degrades the quality of your service, I guess now you understand why some projects will never come to a bigger exchange, even if they want to pay. 1. Please look at the offer: https://ibb.co/LzkZMPd. It's clearly said "Listing on CMC after traction turning on." CMC has not yet enabled the traction. That's why we said it in the offer. 2. To pass Coingecko we provided them with trading, vol assistance, promotion, Coinpaprika, blog post, and guidance on what to do to pass Coingecko. But Coingecko doesn't accept them because of their low web/project quality. 3. Also, we instructed them how to get Etherscan update: https://ibb.co/JyKT5ZJ. Only token owners can submit such requests on Etherscan. |
|
|
|
After your web started to refer to the ERC20 token (that was agreed to list), the trade was restored.
Check the links:
https://tokpie.com/view_exchange/GREEN-ETH/
https://tokpie.com/view_exchange/GREEN-WBTC/
https://tokpie.com/view_exchange/GREEN-USDT/
That's not our fault that your project doesn't meet the tracker's requirements in full. From our side, everything was done to help you appear there. So we stop calling you blackmailer when you stop blaming us for all your troubles.
Of course, if your goal is just to blackmail us and threaten us, you can continue making your fake accusation.
if we are already talking about blackmail, do you understand that this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376009.msg58659962#msg58659962 is the most obvious form of blackmail and coming on your part? is that really the way you run your business? About accusations against Tokpie here, you BTCITA187 or whoever it represents here need to give some simple answers Did you promise them all of this stuff like listing on CMC, CG etc... and you take money for that? Do you have any refund policy, what if you do not meet all of these requirements? Are you delisted their token much before the end of the contract date? If yes, it is quite legitimate to ask for part of the money back, because you did not deliver the complete service. Tons of hours were spent to provide them with agreed services. Everything was done from our side (trading, vol assistance, promotion, and guidance on what to do to pass trackers). Might be you think we should re-develop their web, find team members for them and do all other development staff. Appearing on trackers is mutual co-working. We did our part, they did not. So, what refund they are asking for now! [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
Perfect! You confirm that your official token is a Matic token (absolutely different from the one that you listed on Tokpie). So, once again how can we continue to list your old (not supported) token? Moreover, how dare you ask a REFUND for the services that were provided for your ERC20 token and infiltrate us now with that thread.
Lie.You are not provided service! And know about Matic (and its absolutely different address) from the start, and mentioned on your blog - is not an argument. Fact - you not provided CG, CMC, Etherscan.
Of course, we delist your token because you stopped mentioning your ERC20 token on your web.
You delist token from Tokpie - True - Please make refund Lie.Its token ALIVE, man, and you can find places, where it mentioned. The reason why its not traded on eth, because of crazy commissions for gas in Ethereum. You trying abandon any ERC-20 token on Ethereum. Its tradable and alive! And its not old! You have captured different part of site, where token not mentioned, its not an argument to stop service. You complete delist token - refund, please!
What's are you talking about. Nothing edited!
Lie.I provide both screenshots to see your deleted lines.
So, you confirm that service was ok. But then, you decided that is better to blackmail money from us and abandon your ERC20 token.
Lie.It's not ok! Sir, sorry that I'm again trying to focus you on whole post. There is absolutely no arguments on each lie that we post and again generated new lie.
1. Where is the screenshot proving that we promised you to list your MATIC TOKEN on our exchange? The deal was about only your ERC20 token 0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544.
2. Where are any references on your website to the ERC20 token 0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544 that we listed as was agreed with you?
Clearly state on your website https://greencoin.online/ that your official token is ERC20 token: 0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544 and we restore your token trading.
Of course, if your goal is just to blackmail us and threaten us, you can continue making your fake accusation.
|
|
|
|
ok Hello guys, we completely don't agree with the blaming man! CryptorClub cheated Tokpie and its users in two ways: 1. He got the listing service a long time ago (April 25): https://tokpie.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019702238-The-Green-Token-GREEN-Listed-on-Tokpie and had not made any blames until now. Why is he blamed now? Because he changed the token network from Ethereum to the Matik that has never been supported by Tokpie. 2. So, he decided to blackmail us by requiring a refund of 100% first. When we refused to satisfy such a ridiculous request, he wrote this post and requested a 50% refund. This man is a blackmailer! Regarding listing on trackers, we made everything from our side, but this man simply could not satisfy trackers' requirements in terms of his project quality. Bottom line.- Ask yourself why CryptorClub has been silent since April 25? - Ask yourself why Tokpie has already listed over 120 projects for the last 12 months and only this man is blaming us? - We kindly ask bitcointalk's admins to close this fake blaming post and red flag CryptorClub user. [...] Now that both party is here, discussion and investigation should be easier. BTCITA187, I'd like to give you a mind-blowing information: email screenshot works both ways. Just like how CryptorClub could provide history of email exchanges between them and TOKPIE, you can too. As you claimed that they have been silent since 25 April, and only now started to complain in order to blackmail a refund, can you provide a screenshot of email history indicating that it is indeed true that your last email with them is as how they provide in the evidence, and there were not any other emails in between April and December, whether from their side complaining about the broken agreement, or from you asking anything --thus, proving and favoring your side that you've delivered the product as promised and there were no issue up to earlier this month.
Screenshot 1: https://ibb.co/X3g9YS8
Screenshot 2: https://ibb.co/d7LS2qP
Screenshot 3: https://ibb.co/QDCYS0v
Screenshot 4: https://ibb.co/sySrtWMSecond, is there a logical, acceptable, or whatever reason you can provide that explains why you stopped the lifetime volume assistance support? No matter who blackmailed who --I'd like to point out that YOUC, your partner, is also blackmailing CryptorClub, threatening that they'll have a very bad review that'll appear on google's top result-- a deal is a deal, you promised volume assistance that's free for as long as the project live. Not only that, as per their claim, you also failed to deliver the promise where they'll be listed on CoinGecko, CMC, etc.
The logic is simple. The Green exchange listed its ERC20 GREEN token on Tokpie (on April 25) and Tokpie made what was offered (screenshots above). Then, Green exchange changed (NOT TELLING to Tokpie) its token to the new one GrandpaGreen (GGREEN) running on Matic network. Proving screenshot: https://ibb.co/ZBhnyk9
Proving link on their telegram: https://t.me/greencoinexchange/417. But, Tokpie had never been supporting the Matic network (and CryptorClub knows that), so vol service and even trading his old GREEN token could NOT be provided technically anymore. CryptorClub decided to use it as an occasion to get money back despite a lot of work made for him. Shame man.
Moreover, the fact that he did not notify us about such a vital network change means that he cheated us.I couldn't care less about what other project said about you in the past. There are a lot of projects that started good and left the stage in the years that follow. Like YOUC, for example, and how their thread is now abandoned. So, what is your version for these two accusation points I state above?
Agree with you! but our Btt thread is not abandoned and part of the positive feedbacks provided above are fresh The Matic Network and GrandpaGreen (absolutely different token) is not related at all to this thread!
It does relate to the issue. You stopped to support Green token ERC20 (0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544). No mention of it on your web (screenshots below): https://greencoin.online/ So how do you think we can support a token if the project itself DOESN't SUPPORT it, and you DON’t RELATE TO it anymore.
Screenshot 1: https://ibb.co/WtPJnXW
Screenshot 2: https://ibb.co/R4VRyyy
Screenshot 3: https://ibb.co/JxgrD7d
Screenshot 4: https://ibb.co/XY8HnXV
Screenshot 5: https://ibb.co/WsJspqw
Screenshot 6: https://ibb.co/whnBJzZ
Tokpie had never been supporting the Matic network (and CryptorClub knows that), so vol service and even trading his old GREEN token could NOT be provided technically anymore. Lie, that could NOT be provided technically. They provide trading until this topic was created. GREEN token always has erc-20 standard on Ethereum and nothing was changed! WE NEVER ASK to provide trading volume on Matic network. GREEN is not old - is live token in Ethereum network, that can be deposited/withdrawed from/to Matic Network as any other ERC-20 standard token. We ask to add Matic contract address on CG, and they say no problem. Letter below https://i.ibb.co/BV60PCM/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-24-45-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngSo Tokpie had never been supporting the Matic network is also lie, because they agree to add it on the stage of negotiation.
Green Exchnage (GrandpaGreen) Lie:
Look at the screenshot carefully https://i.ibb.co/BV60PCM/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-24-45-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.png: we showed you how other projects add other token addresses to their CG page. It doesn’t mean that we could or can list Matic tokens on Tokpie.
his old GREEN token could NOT be provided technically anymore means, that from moment of Bitcointalk topic creation? Right? All worked good(for ETH pair) until letters in December? Because was no letters regarding problems with Matic before. By the way, you agree to work with it on stage of negotiations. So if service can't be provided, why still no refund? Show screenshot where we agreed or promised to list your MATIK token on exchange!!!
This stage of negotiations shows an example that an additional token address can be added to CG, but it doesn’t prove that we promised you to list Matic tokens on Tokpie. We never did it!
Then, Green exchange changed (NOT TELLING to Tokpie) its token to the new one GrandpaGreen (GGREEN) running on Matic network. Proving screenshot: https://ibb.co/ZBhnyk9GREEN Token was never changed. We don't have to inform about any other tokens we launched on other networks and GrandpaGreen ( GGREEN - is absolutely other token with other unique name and ticker) and its not related to this topic! Other thing, that any user with his any ERC-20 token launched on Ethereum can deposit/withdraw it to Matic network, and there it has another contract address. So this is official GREEN token address on Matic 0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81 We talk our token can be deposited to Matic from the start. Here they agree to add Matic address to CoinGecko https://i.ibb.co/BV60PCM/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-24-45-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngAnd they personally provide screenshot, where was mentioned Matic. [/quote] Look at the screenshot again: https://i.ibb.co/BV60PCM/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-24-45-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.png we show you how Matic address can be added on CG. It doesn’t mean that we can list Matic token!The both ways emails here https://i.ibb.co/SfKGw9j/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-00-46-13-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngHere is request about exactly this Matic address https://i.ibb.co/MDPhHM4/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-47-25-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngHere is response, that no problem, they can add it https://i.ibb.co/BV60PCM/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-05-24-45-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngAfter that they made post on their blog, mentioning Matic and original contract address on Matic 0x8a4001fd666be272605c56bb956d11a46200db81 https://i.ibb.co/F4XLTjv/Screenshot-2021-12-13-at-22-59-35-Tokpie-Green-Exchange-is-SCAM-and-Grandpa-Green-Token-is-SCAM.pngLink on post: https://tokpie.io/blog/trade-green-exchange-token/[/quote]
Mentioning your Matic token in decryption is NOT the same as listing it! We never said to you that we can list MATIC token!
Moreover, the fact that he did not notify us about such a vital network change means that he cheated us. Lie.About notification response in previous block (At it was not change but possibility of any token). And its not related to this topic. ERC20 (Green Token) GREEN was launched on ethereum and Its contract address: 0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544 Its name and network was never changedBecause its technically impossible nor to change name nor to change network. This token still alive and can be: Deposited, Withdrawed, Transferred Anyway Nor GREEN (as token, that has Matic possibility) Nor GrandpaGreen (that is absolutely other token) not related to this topic at all. Your team NOT make listing of ethereum erc-20 GREEN token with address (0x5e68801a5dda8671051006eb2920ffe9cd553544) on: CoinGecko Etherscan CoinMarketCap Forever free volume rejected (ETH/WBTC/USDT - Ethereum mainnet) Please focus on that.
Look at this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376009.msg58705196#msg58705196 We made all steps to provide your ERC20 token with all promised services. But because of your inability to improve your web, some trackers refused to accept you. Who Compensate us all these efforts? You can migrate to any token that you want or even close your fake project, but it does not mean that we must pay you any refund.
1. He got the listing service a long time ago (April 25) We got listing service on Tokpie (what has no priority) with forever free volume, but not on (CG,CMC, Etherscan - that has priority) In May we first time ask about 50% refund 2. So, he decided to blackmail us by requiring a refund of 100% first. Lie.First we ask them twice to get 50% refund to close this question. In May and in DecemberOnly then CryptorClub post topic on Bitcointalk. Then they wrote in Telegram, screenshot in starter post, that they delist token from everywhere - and already delist it from Tokpie! 100% refund asked now After they reject 50% refund proposal twice, in May and in December, when rejected volume assistance and on actual time delisted from Tokpie. And because spent a lot of time right now including this topic work.
Of course, we delist your token because you stopped mentioning your ERC20 token on your web.
No mention: https://ibb.co/WtPJnXW
No mention: https://ibb.co/R4VRyyy
No mention: https://ibb.co/JxgrD7d
No mention: https://ibb.co/XY8HnXV
No mention: https://ibb.co/WsJspqw
No mention: https://ibb.co/whnBJzZ
- Ask yourself why CryptorClub has been silent since April 25?
Lie. We also already asked about 50% refund first time in May.https://i.ibb.co/LgrTwQh/Screenshot-2021-12-13-at-22-22-35-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngAlso was letters in July and Aug with volume problems. Late Aug letter you ignored. The first reason, why we wait, that this volume assistance can be positive in long term for possibility to be listed on CoinGecko. The second reason - is trial to trust to Tokpie (refused to provide team section) he could not pass CG About team publishing they not ask on the start and took money to list in 72 Hours. Also they propose to publish fake team and brilliantly edit their email screenshot. Original one: https://i.ibb.co/2Pq1hKY/Screenshot-2021-12-13-at-22-42-54-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngTheir fake/edited screenshot
What's are you talking about. Nothing edited! Look again https://i.ibb.co/2Pq1hKY/Screenshot-2021-12-13-at-22-42-54-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.png to see that all ways were offered to you to solve the problem.
CryptorClub were exchanging emails with Tokpie team on April, which emails can be summed as that Tokpie promised a promotion, free lifetime volume assistance, and listing on CG, CMC, etc. within 24-72 hours after the payment, which set us roughly around the end of April 2021 at the latest to see all of the deals to be completed. So why do they waited until December, more than 7 months, to report the failed deal? I'm curious if there are other exchanges of emails between April and December. Further, TOKPIE's reply on this part of email gave an impression to me that CryptorClub missed a step or two, I'd really appreciate if either side can give an information about this  Given CryptorClub is currently temporarily banned from the forum for incentivizing post, I understood that his reply will be delayed for at least until January 2022 and LinksMe.ga is jumping in to fill the position, I'll appreciate if LinksMe.ga can answer and shed some light into the matters I asked. There was letters between these gap, with such topics (not so important for our opinion): 50% refund in MayThey tried to boost volume, and convinced that fail with CG would be compensating with free volume, to have more chance to be listed in future https://i.ibb.co/LgrTwQh/Screenshot-2021-12-13-at-22-22-35-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngThan we not control process and find in July, that stopped volume assistance. They renew it after request, on that moment on three pairs In early Aug was few letters about BNB pair possibility They request with additional payments for this In late Aug we ask about check their volume trading assistance, wasn't stable They ignored it Than we not control the volume assistance and checkup it in Dec - two pairs from three was not active and Coingecko isn't possible during their last emails at all they changed/add new rules and ask about new money depositing for volume boosting seems ask about new 950$ for CG form update. Here is the full letter, because on previous screenshot only part visible https://i.ibb.co/p4dJ2TC/Screenshot-2021-12-14-at-04-44-18-GREEN-price-market-cap-on-Etherscan-CMC-Coin-Gecko-Trading-View-an.pngYou may see, that additional services payments for updates needed (you may see its not purple, added specially) CMC(950$) + CG(950$) and only after at least CG(950$) they will update etherscan. And after all of this, they delisted GREEN from Tokpie and post, that they something technically can't here on Bitcointalk. his old GREEN token could NOT be provided technically anymore. Shame on me The first reason, why we wait, that this volume assistance can be positive in long term for possibility to be listed on CoinGecko. Shame on me
The second reason - is tried to trust to Tokpie, that with volume, that can do something. Shame on me
So, you confirm that service was ok. But then, you decided that is better to blackmail money from us and abandon your ERC20 token.
|
|
|
|
I'm somewhat sure you're aware that there is an active and unsolved scam accusation against you and your partner, TOKPIE. I'll really appreciate if you can give your side of the story on the thread to avoid a flag to be raised against both of the projects. Failed to give your side of the story will most likely validate the accusation and would persuade people --or at least me-- to support the flag against you. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376009.0I'll hope to heard next from you on the thread from above link. The fake accusation has been already replied in full here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5376009.msg58706349#msg58706349 |
|
|
|
ok Hello guys, we completely don't agree with the blaming man! CryptorClub cheated Tokpie and its users in two ways: 1. He got the listing service a long time ago (April 25): https://tokpie.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360019702238-The-Green-Token-GREEN-Listed-on-Tokpie and had not made any blames until now. Why is he blamed now? Because he changed the token network from Ethereum to the Matik that has never been supported by Tokpie. 2. So, he decided to blackmail us by requiring a refund of 100% first. When we refused to satisfy such a ridiculous request, he wrote this post and requested a 50% refund. This man is a blackmailer! Regarding listing on trackers, we made everything from our side, but this man simply could not satisfy trackers' requirements in terms of his project quality. Bottom line.- Ask yourself why CryptorClub has been silent since April 25? - Ask yourself why Tokpie has already listed over 120 projects for the last 12 months and only this man is blaming us? - We kindly ask bitcointalk's admins to close this fake blaming post and red flag CryptorClub user. [...] Now that both party is here, discussion and investigation should be easier. BTCITA187, I'd like to give you a mind-blowing information: email screenshot works both ways. Just like how CryptorClub could provide history of email exchanges between them and TOKPIE, you can too. As you claimed that they have been silent since 25 April, and only now started to complain in order to blackmail a refund, can you provide a screenshot of email history indicating that it is indeed true that your last email with them is as how they provide in the evidence, and there were not any other emails in between April and December, whether from their side complaining about the broken agreement, or from you asking anything --thus, proving and favoring your side that you've delivered the product as promised and there were no issue up to earlier this month.
Screenshot 1: https://ibb.co/X3g9YS8
Screenshot 2: https://ibb.co/d7LS2qP
Screenshot 3: https://ibb.co/QDCYS0v
Screenshot 4: https://ibb.co/sySrtWMSecond, is there a logical, acceptable, or whatever reason you can provide that explains why you stopped the lifetime volume assistance support? No matter who blackmailed who --I'd like to point out that YOUC, your partner, is also blackmailing CryptorClub, threatening that they'll have a very bad review that'll appear on google's top result-- a deal is a deal, you promised volume assistance that's free for as long as the project live. Not only that, as per their claim, you also failed to deliver the promise where they'll be listed on CoinGecko, CMC, etc.
The logic is simple. The Green exchange listed its ERC20 GREEN token on Tokpie (on April 25) and Tokpie made what was offered (screenshots above). Then, Green exchange changed (NOT TELLING to Tokpie) its token to the new one GrandpaGreen (GGREEN) running on Matic network. Proving screenshot: https://ibb.co/ZBhnyk9
Proving link on their telegram: https://t.me/greencoinexchange/417. But, Tokpie had never been supporting the Matic network (and CryptorClub knows that), so vol service and even trading his old GREEN token could NOT be provided technically anymore. CryptorClub decided to use it as an occasion to get money back despite a lot of work made for him. Shame man.
Moreover, the fact that he did not notify us about such a vital network change means that he cheated us.I couldn't care less about what other project said about you in the past. There are a lot of projects that started good and left the stage in the years that follow. Like YOUC, for example, and how their thread is now abandoned. So, what is your version for these two accusation points I state above?
Agree with you! but our Btt thread is not abandoned and part of the positive feedbacks provided above are fresh |
|
|
|
Please be aware of many scammers so send funds carefully.
|
|
|
|
|
your website is not working
|
|
|
|
Good day!
In the 1,5 weeks that have passed since the announcement of GOpherON Lab we, with a great surprise for ourselves, received a lot of letters with questions about the project. Due to the unexpected interest of the community, it was decided to reduce the threshold level and decrease the number, as well as the price, of tokens by 10 times in order to provide more interesting conditions for participants of this crazy trip; updated information is provided on the website, as well as below.
Token Symbol: GOON
Token Type and Platform: ERC-20, Ethereum
Total Token Supply: 1.000.000.000
Community Token Supply: 700.000.000
Founders and Team Token Supply: 80.000.000 (locked for 1 year)
Tokens Reserved for Funding: 160.000.000 (locked for 3 years)
Advisors and Bounty Campaign Token Supply: 60.000.000
Minimal Purchase Volume: 20.000 GOON
Accepted Crypto: ETH
Fixed Token Price: 0.000001 ETH
Token distribution: not later than 1 hour after contribution; tokens come unlocked.
P.S. Since a new smart contract is required because of the change in the terms of the token issue - the start of ITO is shifted to 17 November 2021.
Once again, what is the token address? |
|
|
|
|
What's the token address?
and by the way your telegram (stated on the website) doesn't exist
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
