Thank you for confirming once again that you have a severe obsession with measuring a member's worth solely through signature campaigns and post frequency.

You talk about monetization, monetization my foot, I couldn't care less about signature campaign money. I run my own real-world business and don't rely on forum payouts to make a living. Unlike you, I don't need to post endlessly to hit a weekly quota, nor do I throw baseless allegations at others to justify my presence here. You got exposed when your intelligence was questioned, and your fragile ego has been in meltdown mode ever since. You were wrong then, and you are wrong now.

Taking a few days off just means I have a actual life and don't spend every breathing moment on Bitcointalk trying to police users. I will post whenever I have the time, but I certainly won't waste my valuable time arguing with a cheap mentality—someone who lives off campaign earnings and views everyone with paranoid suspicion, just like your colleague nutildah.

Keep monitoring my log. It must be exhausting living with that level of paranoia.

I appreciate the constructive tone of your reply and the advice.

We may disagree on how tags are used or how quick assumptions are formed about new/returning accounts, but I respect that you explained your rationale without hostility.

I agree on one thing: time and consistent actions speak louder than back-and-forth arguments on a thread. My goal was never to drag out conflict, but simply to address what I felt were unfair tags placed on my profile.

That being said, I stand firmly by my words regarding nutildah. Right from day one, when he mockingly told me to "enjoy your rank up," his actions have been driven by pure ego rather than fairness. Constantly looking for excuses to target returning or new accounts is a harmful precedent that damages the welcoming environment this forum should have.

I have said what I needed to say regarding my position. Moving forward, my focus will strictly be on participating constructively and letting my activity speak for itself.

Fair enough, and I appreciate you clarifying your stance in a calm manner.

To give you an honest answer: when I returned to the forum, my intention was simply to participate normally and learn the basics like merits and signatures. But when you get targeted with neutral/negative tags and face heavy accusations right out of the gate, you don't have the luxury of taking months to figure things out. Necessity forces you to read Meta topics, understand how DT works, and learn how to defend yourself very quickly.

If you review the thread, you will notice the word "tag" coming up repeatedly. I am not blind; I can see everything on my profile, including the neutral tag you left on my account. In my view, that tag was also a misuse of power simply because I was speaking the truth. If you check the second thread I created, I laid out the entire situation in detail showing how nutildah’s ego was bruised.

That shift in tone wasn't planned—it was pure survival mode after being backed into a corner. I'm not trying to play a veteran; I'm just defending my account against what I genuinely believe is an unfair situation.

---

You don’t need anyone to pop your bubble—you’ve already proven you live in one by asking your own DT circle to validate your power trip.

When you weaponize negative tags over a hurt ego instead of actual proof, no amount of seeking approval from your echo chamber changes the fact that it's a blatant abuse of power. Keep hiding behind your DT status; everyone watching outside your little circle sees it for exactly what it is.

You are so blinded by your own power and ego that you actually expect members to act like your personal servants. I don't answer to you, and I am not going to perform tricks on command just to satisfy your fragile pride.

Your entire argument is a desperate attempt to save face after your initial baseless accusations fell flat. Everyone following this thread already sees it for what it truly is: a childish abuse of DT power triggered by a hurt ego, not actual evidence.

You don't need years on this forum or a degree in Bitcointalk history to recognize obvious ganging up and power abuse—you just need basic common sense.

Digging through my old local posts because you lack any solid arguments only proves my point. Save the cheap sarcasm. Experiencing ego-driven censorship firsthand doesn't require a steep learning curve, and no amount of post-digging will cover up how nutildah and his cheerleaders are misusing the Trust system.

---

Who do you think you are—the president of the forum? I am not your servant, and I have no obligation to jump through hoops just to satisfy your ego.

Free AI detection tools are non-deterministic, they update models, change algorithms, and give different outputs over time. Expecting the exact same score hours/days later on a live scanner is just a convenient distraction. The truth is, after getting called out and humiliated on your baseless AI claim when I gave you a proper response, your fragile ego couldn't handle it. Now you are desperately clinging to this micro-detail just to save face.

Keep the tag. I don't care. Everyone reading this thread can see right through your tactics, this negative tag was slapped on out of pure spite and a hurt ego, not actual evidence.

Your reply perfectly exposes your worldview: you assume every member here is just a commodity hunting for signature campaign payouts. That might be how you operate, but it isn't my motivation.

I am not going anywhere. I don't post here for campaign earnings, so you can keep your tags. Your expectation that I will "abandon" this account will go unfulfilled, regardless of how many neutral or negative tags you and your peers throw at it.

You mention my knowledge of DT, but it doesn't take years of posting to see the rot. Your colleague, nutildah, has made it crystal clear that "Trust" is just a tool for ego-driven censorship. His blatant misuse of power to silence anyone who challenges his flawed narrative is exactly what is poisoning this forum, and your support of that toxic behavior is just as pathetic.

It’s a classic "heads I win, tails you lose" setup. When I post in broken English, you claim I'm farming; when I take the time to communicate clearly, you claim I'm an alt. Your attempts to frame my improvement as "suspicious" are just desperate excuses to keep this witch hunt going.

Keep hunting for "imaginary alts" and waiting for me to quit. Every day this account remains active is a direct refutation of your little narrative.

You have only zero value for me. Keep it up to fulfil your posting quota and misuse of your power.

I have already said before that this person is stubborn to the extreme.

He will never admit that he made a mistake; he only abuses his power. Now, when everyone is asking him to reconsider his decision, instead of accepting it, he is even rejecting the advice of senior members.

This is because he is stubborn and selfcentered, he believes that whatever he did was right and everyone else is wrong.

He must have held a personal grudge over some old post because that is just who he is. Even though I am new here, I have come to understand his true nature very well.

I already said in the other thread that theymos has given a box of matches to a monkey, and he will soon set the whole forum on fire.

And this guy nutildah is an extremely stubborn person. He just thinks that whatever he did is right, and he never admits his mistakes at all. Even now, he has done the exact same thing.

So you guys can try all you want, but this person will not listen. Only one person can fix him, and that is the forum admin, theymos. Otherwise, he will leave this forum burned down. Mark my words, and very soon all of you will realize that I was right.

I knew from day one that you are far too stubborn to ever admit when you are wrong. I have provided clear explanations and facts since the beginning, but no one can reason with pure arrogance. Go ahead and keep this thread open so everyone can watch how you continue to abuse your power. Leaving DT and sigban access in hands like yours is like handing a box of matches to a monkey—sooner or later, it will burn the whole place down, and theymos will realize this soon enough.

Keep showing everyone what kind of person you are, someone who cares only about protecting his own fragile ego rather than acknowledging the truth or treating innocent members fairly. Continue your powertrip, but your complete lack of objectivity is on full display for the whole forum to see.

So out of everything discussed, this is the only remaining concern you could dig up?

Let me address it directly: on that day, the tool showed 51%. My only mistake was that I did not take a screenshot at that moment. If I had saved a screenshot, I would have direct proof right now. Unfortunately, I don't have it, and I own up to that oversight.

Unlike you, I am fully capable of admitting when I made a mistake or lacked foresight. But you can stack as many AI accusations as you want, I know I am not using AI, and since I am telling the truth, I have no obligation to keep endlessly defending myself to you. Believe it or not, that is up to you, otherwise, mind your own business.

Keep misusing your power, and stick to your initial narrative, like when you challenged me to rank up on day one, rather than admitting you made an error. You will never admit a mistake because your ego will not allow you to bend, as you think it ruins your reputation. But keep in mind, what you are doing is completely wrong, and sooner or later, you will realize it.

You are extraordinarily stubborn and completely incapable of admitting when you are wrong. But that is expected from someone who operates with your kind of mindset.

Your allegations remain completely unsupported by facts, whether you accept that reality or not.

Other users simply blindly follow what you and your circle do to exercise their own DT power. As I have stated repeatedly, I do not care about these tags. I have already explained my position transparently. If people want to abuse their authority just they can go right ahead.

Where I post, whether in the Wall Observer or anywhere else on this forum is absolutely none of your concern. You have already abused your power as much as you could, so shut the fuck up.

Standard "boating accident" logic in reverse.

End of the day, Bitcoin doesn't care who buys it or why.

This is actually a very constructive suggestion. Providing the original native text alongside a translation would make it much easier for native speakers to verify the context and intention, helping to differentiate genuine users from automated AI generators.

If the forum mandates or adopts this practice, I would be more than happy to include my original text in future posts.

---

The thread you created against me from day one is completely baseless.

My early posts were short one-liners written when I was extremely low on time, along with only one posts in the gambling board. And this is showing that my English level changed and posting behaviour changed? Disgusting.

You claim that I deleted my first post. Prove it. Show everyone which post was deleted. It is very easy to throw around baseless allegations, but much harder to back them up with proof. You are simply misusing your power without providing a single piece of real evidence.

You and nutildah operate with the exact same mindset. On day one, nutildah challenged me to rank up my account to prove myself. Both of you are just trying to validate your initial false assumptions at any cost, simply because you are afraid of admitting you were wrong and ruining your reputation. But you are completely wrong.

I repeat my request to theymos: both JollyGood and nutildah should be removed from the DT list. They slap baseless accusations on users and then go to any length to force their narrative when proven wrong.

As for your claim that I will abandon this account because I cannot monetize it, I am still right here, and I will continue to enjoy participating on this forum whenever I am free. Neither your tag nor nutildah tag makes any difference to me.

Regarding campaign earnings, 30% of my business income already goes directly to helping those in need. I do not rely on this forum for money. Even if I were to join a campaign and earn anything, every single cent would go straight to charity. So keep your false assumptions to yourself.

You have clearly run out of real arguments, which is why you are resorting to fabricated stories about deleted posts and English changes, points I have already explained transparently. Keep trying, but your narrative has zero weight.

I am not very familiar with all the details of the contest, but your options make sense. If you ask me, setting a minimum threshold of around 250 merits would be a good starting point. After that, selecting the top 10 to 20 submissions and leaving the final choice to the host's judges seems fair. If the host provides the judging panel, they will likely pick the rightful winner.


Reading through this entire thread is honestly ridiculous. It is hard to comprehend what is actually going on here.

Let me share a few of his previous quotes where he repeatedly asks the exact same question, just like in the PM mentioned in the OP:

This is a plain misuse of authority.

He acts as if he is completely infallible and incapable of ever being wrong.

Who is he, and why should anyone be trying to impress him? Just because he holds DT status? Asking this same repetitive question to almost every new user is completely baseless. If every new account is automatically assumed to belong to an existing user, then new members might as well not join at all.

Now he is acting like an astrologer who can somehow predict the future without presenting concrete evidence.

I strongly urge theymos to look into how nutildah and JollyGood are managing their DT status. Even if my request is ignored because I am a new user, continuing with this mindset will harm the forum's health.

If they want absolute control without adhering to objective standards, they should set up their own platform and manage it however they see fit.

So writing a short, readable paragraph without spelling errors is now proof that someone is using Grok? That is a massive reach.

I wrote that post myself expressing my own thoughts on the topic, and I will continue to participate in the forum naturally. And again I am saying you are just misusing you power.

And I am still on my words that I did not use Grok or AI. The thing is that you don't want to accept because acceptance will insult you.

Thank you for pointing out that quote from theymos. To be honest, I was not fully aware of this specific guideline regarding grammar polishers and text restructurers. My intention was only to make my non native English clear and readable, not to bypass forum rules or use generative AI slop.

Now that this rule has been brought to my attention, I understand the boundary clearly. I appreciate the clarification, and I will strictly follow these guidelines in all my future posts.




I have already explained earlier why I posted in the Wall Observer thread.

I do not intentionally leave typos to "fool" anyone. When using standard grammar checkers or typing out non native thoughts, the output depends heavily on how the text is input or commanded. Sometimes sentence structures still end up awkward, and typing errors remain.

I have been completely transparent about my context, and there are no hidden accounts or motives behind my posts.

Regarding the Pangram screenshots:

As I have explained many times I use grammar checkers to refine my English since it is not my native language. These tools restructure sentences to sound formal, which third party AI detectors routinely flag as "AI generated" or "humanized AI." And cherry picking a specific AI detector simply because it fits a narrative to prove someone wrong is unfair.

Linking me to CryptoYar just because of a couple of short AI detector scans is a huge stretch. You are trying to connect me to a completely different user without any real proof.

I have zero intention of dishonest posting or farming. I will continue posting naturally in my own voice sometimes using grammar polishers.

​Hello everyone,

​I am aware that I am a relatively new member here and that many might side against me, but I kindly ask the community to look at the facts neutrally.

​The situation began when I quoted nutildah in a thread here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5589786.msg67004276#msg67004276

​In the following post, nutildah claimed my response was generated by Grok:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5589786.msg67004937#msg67004937

​He also stated:


​Later, while browsing the Wall Observer (WO) thread (which I didn't even know stood for "Wall Observer" at the time), nutildah posted this:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg67018502#msg67018502

​When Heuristic awarded merits neutrally, nutildah followed up here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg67018867#msg67018867

​He then made another post targeting me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg67019683#msg67019683

​I replied to explain my stance:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg67020010#msg67020010

​However, he created another post against me:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg67021747#msg67021747

​To which I responded again:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg67022526#msg67022526

I am clearly inviting everyone check my post history. Check if these are written by AI.

He just gave me a neutral tag without even listening to me. Isn't this a misuse of power? I came to know in WO that he has the power to issue signature bans. I am not saying he is using it incorrectly, but if he is using it for his personal ego, will this be good for the forum?

​

---

​Regarding JollyGood, he created a thread about my account here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5590543.msg67016825#msg67016825

​I provided a detailed response explaining my activity gap and work routine:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5590543.msg67017115#msg67017115

​In response, JollyGood stated:

​He is assuming I operate multiple accounts, which is false. Registering an account in 2023 and returning after a break due to work commitments should not automatically mark someone as an account farmer. I have provided honest explanations, yet I am still being treated with suspicion.

---

I hope you all will see it neutrally.

I don't know if this is right or wrong, but I am inviting @theymos, @JayJuanGee, and other senior members to check if I am actually in the wrong.

Of course, This user should be banned because he hurts your ego.


You replied to me with this, and you are sticking to your words because I still don't know how I found the WO and started posting there. I was enjoying it, but you went there and checked, thinking, 'Oh no, if he ranks up, my words will become garbage. How is this possible? I must catch him at any cost.' Oh, come on, man, just get out of that mindset. It was just casual posting in WO, but it hurt you.

I know there are many who just go to your side because I am just new member here.

Because I am on his ego list. So


So this rule is only for me.


If sapling is right so your post is also AI generated.


After correction of grammar and punctuation.


51% Sapling

So this is the standard to check anyone's posts?

I know you have the power and you can use it at anytime. But don't use it in the wrong way.


And for this I already replied.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg67020010#msg67020010

Don't say that too loud or they'll start running AI detectors on vapourminer next.