Bitcoin Forum
October 13, 2024, 05:33:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Economy / Services / Re: [CFNP][banned mixer] Mixer Review#2| 6mBTC+50% OFF | Bonus 10mBTC & 10% OFF for ALL! on: November 02, 2023, 01:46:00 PM
Quote
Ratimov

All the identified issues have been fixed, and a couple of additional sentences have been added to the tasks. As always, a full report will be provided after all the revisions.

Quote
TryNinja

Smiley

---> The traffic that clients send to our server cannot be decrypted without our private key. Mathematics...

<--- The traffic that we send to clients can only be decrypted with their "private client key". This key is stored in the client's browser environment and only for the duration of the session. Each client's browser generates a unique key pair.

Stealing client keys is only possible through a "heavy-handed injection" of malicious code during the proxying process by DDOS-Guard.

Furthermore, the attacker would need to manipulate "security headers". Our "security policy" at the header level prohibits any traffic transmission to external resources. This will also be very noticeable.

Such an attack is technically possible but theoretically implausible and highly impractical.

1. Injecting malicious code would be detectable.
2. No project would take such a reputational risk.
3. Such an attack cannot be sustained, at most, it could intercept some of the clients' public keys, which would be pointless.

The current protection is almost an ideal solution against MITM.

In addition to protecting against MITM, this technique poses significant barriers in:

- Hacker attacks
- DDoS
- Creating phishing sites
- Intercepting traffic in case of browser malware infection
- Data tampering and injections in case of browser malware infection

...

But we've also enabled a "paranoid mode" Smiley
We've created a "Bot" that periodically visits the site and checks the SHA-256 sums of the files passed by the DDOS-Guard proxy server.
In the event of data tampering, we'll quickly detect it and take action.

...

We are continuing to work on updates. In the coming days, a full report on the work done will be provided, and the winners of the second phase of testing will be announced.
22  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: November 01, 2023, 03:56:36 PM

We have implemented protection against Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks.
All critical data on the website is encrypted using the RSA asymmetric cryptography algorithm.

Now, DDOS-Guard or any other service providing DDoS protection won't be able to intercept our clients' data.

Here's how it works:

- When placing an order in the browser environment, a pair of 2048-bit RSA keys is generated (ClientPublicKey and ClientPrivateKey).
- Inside our JavaScript, there is our system's public key (SystemPublicKey).
- When placing an order, the client's browser encrypts the transmitted data using our public key (SystemPublicKey). Only we can decrypt this data because only we have the private key (SystemPrivateKey).
- In response from the server, the client also receives encrypted data, which was encrypted using the client's public key (ClientPublicKey). Only the client can decrypt the received data because only they have the private key (ClientPrivateKey).
- In addition, it is impossible to intercept order addresses by inspecting HTTP requests. OrderID is simply absent in the requests.

Encryption has been implemented for all critical parts of the project, namely:

- Order creation
- Order page
- Downloading a Letter of Guarantee
- Using the tumbler code
- Support

We would appreciate any feedback related to this update (primarily of a technical nature).
23  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: October 25, 2023, 02:19:34 PM
Quote
I know, because the point of coinjoin is to create fungible coins which follow the exact same pattern. X inputs which are owned by several entities are consolidated, creating Y outputs. This process provably obfuscates the ownership. The fact that AML bots treat these as "100% tainted" tells a lot about the mixing effectiveness. They cannot tell who's who, and thus, treat the entire set of outputs as "tainted", which is beyond insane.

And, to my great regret, there's nothing that can be done about it. Such systems will continue to operate, and over time, their numbers will grow. I'm afraid to predict, but it seems to me that the next step is mandatory verification of transactions by miners before adding them to blocks Smiley

Quote
Until when is the question. You're a privacy-focused service which tries to adapt with anti-privacy organization that rely on utter guesswork, which I find fundamentally erroneous. You say that you want to adapt, I'm genuinely curious with what estimations you base your work since anything can be treated as "tainted" by these people with no justification given.
To me, it seems that you've observed which techniques are considered "red flags" by their software, and you try to mitigate to alternative privacy methods. Is that it?

We tested a vast number of transactions in the AML bot. In reality, their system is quite simple. It's all based on the concept of good and bad. For instance, if you have 1 BTC with a 100% risk after CoinJoin, it's enough to mix this address with another 1 BTC from a verified exchange to reduce the risk to 50%.

In our system, we eliminated the most obvious patterns for identifying bad coins and configured payout logic based on Blockchair patterns. The result is a very effective system that, with a large pool of coins and a growing customer base, will become the best of its kind.
24  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 02:23:43 PM
Quote
To which update are you referring to?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5467457.msg63044753#msg63044753

Quote
That is a question for [banned mixer]. How do you make sure that your "AML scoring" is acceptable?

We have already answered this question above.

Quote
✅ Our platform is not designed for satisfactory results in systems like AMLBot.
Conduct an experiment, connect 10 different addresses of yours with another 10 new addresses in your wallet in one transaction, after which each address in your wallet will have a 97% risk according to AMLBot's assessment. In this case, the AMLBot system will think that you were trying to use CoinJoin technology. Do you think this is a fair risk assessment?

We are sure (through testing) that using CoinJoin "completely" is not possible because it becomes a 100% pattern in systems like AML bot and Chainalysis. After today's update, our system uses a hybrid approach, but it will take time for you to notice the difference as new transaction chains are formed.

We're not trying to achieve a favorable AML score by giving up full CoinJoin. We're adapting to the current situation. Everyone has learned to detect it and label those transactions negatively. Why bother with that? We can take a different approach.
25  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 06:56:50 AM
Quote
It's just sad how some people don't appreciate the censorship resistance this network provides in such efficient and effective manner.

To some extent, we've implemented what you need. In reality, please test our service in one month, and you'll see that previous transactions will no longer have the same obvious 1-2 pattern. It takes time to create pools and make transactions less conspicuous. Notice that in your review, you mentioned transactions that occurred before the update. We cannot modify the blockchain.
26  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 06:19:25 AM
Quote
To me, the point of a mixer is to make it as hard as possible for a third party to tell which outputs correspond to which inputs.

In the current reality, it's no longer easy to just rely on CoinJoin. You use decentralized exchanges without KYC, which makes CoinJoin a suitable option for you. But how many share your situation? Maybe just 0.01%?

Quote
"AML scores", "tainted coins" and the like, are all inaccurate, made-up nonsense that undermine Bitcoin as currency and attack our privacy.

I agree, but that's the situation right now. Sadly, we might eventually see miners being mandated to include transactions only from verified sources in blocks Smiley

CoinJoin doesn't sever the link between your old and new coins.

For example, you have 1 BTC, and it's publicly known to belong to you. I also have 1 BTC, publicly known to be mine. After a CoinJoin transaction to 10 addresses (0.2 coins each), all 10 addresses receive the marker "Yours and Mine" (50/50), but this doesn't mean the marker disappears.
This is why CoinJoin services function without a hitch; it's just too easy to monitor them.

In our case, the connection is entirely severed.
27  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | [banned mixer] | BITCOIN MIXER ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 04:54:21 AM

🔥👍 We've finished a significant update.
Our system now considers all the heuristics listed on the Blockchair website (100+ indicators).
This means that Blockchair (or anyone else) can no longer determine the recipient's address or where the change went when analyzing our transactions.
28  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 03:07:38 AM
Quote
I do understand that most mixing isn't done so that nobody can tell it's a mixer transaction, the goal is to break the connection between the coins you send and the coins you receive, which you did manage to achieve based on my analysis, I just think that if someone is digging deeper to find out all of this info, it would be wiser to make things more difficult for them even by a small degree.

Analyzing blockchain transactions becomes significantly easier once it's known that you've used a mixer Smiley. Naturally, this grants access to scrutinize past transactions. However, in most cases, after just the second iteration, it becomes challenging to distinguish between the recipient and the change.

Purely mathematically, for a more paranoid approach, using CoinJoin after each payout is tempting to ensure there's no chance of reviewing clients' past transactions.

But here, two immediate issues arise:

1. In this operation, you're immediately exposing not one client of the mixer but hundreds (Example Tx).
2. Your coins will receive a 100% risk rating in AML bots and similar systems, making them unacceptable to any verified exchange or trading platform.

An effective mixer's goal is to disconnect your old and new coins, and we achieve this fully.
29  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 24, 2023, 02:26:54 AM
Quote
BlackHatCoiner,
Again, not strong anonymity.

First off, we're not a CoinJoin mixer.
We operate on a client-to-client basis.
When a user opts for the "premium" level, investor coins are added to the pool.
Let's make a note of that!

Next, I'm not quite following your suggestions regarding improving anonymity.

Our current mixer setup completely severs the connection between your coins.
You might see past transactions from the payout address, but those aren't your coins, right?

Let me let you in on a "secret": when using the Tumbler code, you're guaranteed not to receive your own coins back, even after a thousand "payout-change" iterations.
Even if your coins were partially transferred to another client, using the Tumbler code ensures you'll never get back the coins that remained in the service as change. To me, that sounds pretty fantastic, not "not strong anonymity".

You're deeply mistaken if you think you can achieve the same level of anonymity just using your own wallet. Mathematically, it's just not possible.

First off, our current mixer pool already contains hundreds of addresses with various balances. After testing, that number will soar into the thousands. Try mixing any amount different from your last transaction, and you'll see entirely different addresses. Of course, when testing with amounts like 0.001 BTC, the service won't pay you from an address with a 1 BTC balance. It adjusts according to your amount. In this context, it's plausible that without using the Tumbler code, you might come across your old address someday.

The solution is in place; for maximum anonymity, use the Tumbler code.

THE ESSENCE OF A GOOD MIXER IS TO HAVE A LARGE COIN POOL AND A SYSTEM THAT PROPERLY DISTRIBUTES COINS AMONG CLIENTS.

At present, we only use 10 BTC, but after testing, we'll SIGNIFICANTLY expand the pool. As for the system, it's fully implemented.

From what I gather, you suggest a "payout -> coinjoin -> payout" scheme? That's a pretty bad idea. Not a single verified exchange will accept your coins. The UniJoin mixer already operates on this scheme: after mixing with them, your coins will instantly be flagged with a 97% risk on the AML bot and similar systems, marked as "COINJOIN". CoinJoin schemes are easily detected, and such coins will attract undue attention. Tx.

You've got the MixTum mixer in your signature. I assume nobody forced you to promote that particular mixer, so it's a conscious choice, right? Did you test it before showcasing it in your signature? That mixer sources its payouts from the Huobi exchange, and what's more, all client payouts come from a single address with a "large balance", until it's depleted. Test it for yourself – due to the significant initial balance, you can track their payout history for several weeks! Is that what you call anonymity?

And with that, I'm directly addressing your question about the 0.0002 BTC fee for each receiving address.

In our case, to get a list of all our current addresses (to stage an attack on our pool), one would need to make hundreds of orders with different amounts, paying roughly $5+ for each payout, plus the service fee (and that wouldn't even scratch a tenth of our pool post-testing). Given that different security levels have separate coin pools, such an attack becomes extremely costly. No analytics-type organization will bother with that.
Using your mixer as an example: to de-anonymize all its users in recent weeks, it would take $10-20, right?

Trust us, we've explored all possible operational methods, scrutinized "every competitor" out there.
Our current system is the only one that truly works without any harmful side effects, and most importantly,
it's a real thorn in the side for analytic companies.
30  Economy / Services / Re: [banned mixer] Mixer Review#2| 6mBTC+50% OFF | Bonus 10mBTC & 10% OFF for ALL! on: October 24, 2023, 02:25:37 AM
Quote
BlackHatCoiner,
Again, not strong anonymity.

Answer
31  Economy / Services / Re: [banned mixer] Mixer Review#2| 6mBTC+50% OFF | Bonus 10mBTC & 10% OFF for ALL! on: October 22, 2023, 06:01:48 AM
Mikeywithm,
Thank you for your review Smiley
Replied in the message.
32  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 22, 2023, 05:58:24 AM
The questions and suggestions from the testers of the first and second Review are collected below.



Faisal2202

Quote
"Whenever I write something and want to send it I have to click on the send button, while it should also be done by clicking enter key on the keyboard, it also did not work with shift+Enter. Which means, we have to click via mouse on the send option."

✅✅✅ Added this feature.



mikeywith

Quote
Leave us a message
An error has occurred. Please refresh the page and try again.

✅✅✅ This error might occur if you try to leave a page while a form is still loading. We've added a warning to address this situation.

Quote
The (Please, download the letter of guarantee before a transfer) is hardly noticeable, it must be more visible than the deposit information.

✅✅✅ We added an icon to highlight this text Smiley

Quote
- The tumbler code is somewhere at the bottom of this page, very easy to miss if you don't scroll down and honestly I almost forgot about it since my attention was on the deposit process, the page has a ton of blank space at the top, alongside the logo and steps icons at the top, all of which are taking a lot of "wasted" space

-I think this page should be squeezed to fit a single screen without having to scroll down, where everything needed (Letter of Guarantee + Deposit status + tumbler code appears in the same height level without needing to scroll)

✅❎ We use adaptive web design to ensure pages look consistent in modern browsers our clients use. Usability tests guided information block placement. We'll keep testing new layouts, potentially modifying some blocks in the future.

Quote
No easy way of entering the order number should one close the page by mistake, if someone doesn't pay enough attention to the URL which contains the order number /order#JTPFXE5B-ABCDE then it will be hard for them to go back to the same order without contacting the support team.

✅✅✅ The full page address is repeated in the letter of guarantee. A separate page for entering the order ID seems unnecessary to us.

Quote
1. Despite receiving the transaction the timer is still running on the order page as if it's still yet to come.
2. However, the timer on the website is showing 1h.17mins (not sure why)

❎ ! Unable to reproduce this error. There may have been connection interruptions between your browser and our website.

Quote
The warning that says after the deposit is made:
If one of the outputs has a round value (like exactly 0.1 BTC) — this output can be considered as the recipient. Instead of sending 0.1 BTC, send for example 0.100124.

Is pretty useless at this point, it should show on the first page, and then again on the top of the deposit page not at the bottom, now since you can't control what the user sends, you could at least control what you send by slightly modifying your 0.0002 BTC fee to make it in a dynamic range of say 0.000015 - 0.0002

✅✅✅  We cannot and should not alter the final incoming amount.
If a user wishes to receive exactly 0.001, it is their choice. We merely provide a warning about how such a transfer will be treated.
For instance, if they need to pay for a service that requires an exact amount, altering it would cause problems.

! Additionally, the calculator is available at every mixing stage, providing a warning about the recommended transfer amount just before the transfer.

Quote
1- You consolidated 3 smaller outputs that were not needed

✅✅✅ I don't find anything suspicious. In fact:

1. I can't identify the recipient here (similar to Blockchair).
2. This isn't the usual mixer behavior; typically, it follows a 1-2 pattern.

Excellent work! Smiley

Quote
This input > bc1qkpgugjv55lp0my23m0txn0azww5rvxwyf8qh5p of 0.00022350 is clearly the change address of this transaction
https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/29cecb7abf2b2455ac842f0f2ca20bc64eeafa650244f100dc2ec248549de845
Which came from this address bc1qmtxzrvnzr3ryak5jeprz3eqqsgpq9t4hzvd2g5

✅✅✅ You know that you used a mixer, so it's likely to assume that the addresses from which the funds were received also belong to the mixer and could have been used for payouts before, possibly including you.
Still, it's very suspicious, possibly a negative experience. Noted. Wink  Grin

Quote
I don't like the security level options, it's complicated for the average user, and there should be only one type of mixing, a mixing that works, and the fees to be different only in regards to the outgoing transaction network fee, not that actually privacy result.
✅✅✅ We believe it's a great feature. More details are available in the FAQ section.

Quote
The website should be translated into more languages, personally, I'd like to see it support Arabic.
⌛⌛⌛ Added to the task list.
33  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 21, 2023, 03:30:50 AM
I apologize for the delays in responses; to be honest, project tasks take precedence at the moment.



Quote
BlackHatCoiner,
Could you please explain how front-end Javascript enhances user's anonymity? As far as I know, it can only hurt it: https://tor.stackexchange.com/a/21987. And if you don't mind, how it protects the server's anonymity?

JavaScript plays a crucial role in the operation of our service. Apart from handling backend security against DDoS attacks, complicating the creation of phishing sites, and enhancing usability, the use of JavaScript allows us to maintain a "competitive advantage in terms of security and anonymity" for both us and our clients. Security experts, upon a thorough "review" of the project, will understand the specifics of what is being discussed. It doesn't make sense to publicly disclose all the security methods of our project.

Quote
BlackHatCoiner,
The funds I received in the second mixing were literally taken by the change of the first mixing. That is absolutely unacceptable if I'm requesting from your service to have my coins received in multiple addresses. The whole point of using multiple addresses (AKA, split mixing), is to not reveal common ownership.

As mentioned earlier in the report, we have made changes to this section. Now, for a specified period, deposit funds are temporarily held for all clients.

Quote
dkbit98,
Are there any significantly big changes and improvements with your service from last time you organized review campaign?
First review campaign was only few months ago if I remember correctly.

@icopress ...

Quote
hugeblack,
Since it will not be removed, is there a guarantee that the lifetime discount does not affect privacy.

We have provided a detailed explanation of how the Tumbler code operates in previous messages. Unlike the "conventional" approach, our method is secure.

Quote
hugeblack,
The problem was that I did the mixing process twice, two minutes apart. I completed the first, and after two minutes, a new mixing process began with the same value as the previous one. The problem was that I got my coins from the address of the previous mixing process. In other words, you either have a software problem or you have a problem with the reserves.

As mentioned in the report earlier, we have made changes to this section. Now, for a specified period, your deposit funds are temporarily locked for all clients.

Before, if you didn't use the tumbler code and sent coins in a similar amount to a prior deposit, your coins could be selected for payment to another client, possibly you.
and this is perfectly reasonable, logical, and correct...

Quote
AHOYBRAUSE,
I also applied for the 2nd review campaign, maybe I can test it again but if not that's fine.

Thank you for your previous review. Like all our other contributors, you've played a part in improving our project Smiley
Now, we'd like to hear feedback from new testers.
34  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 19, 2023, 07:09:52 PM

[banned mixer] launches the [banned mixer] Mixer Review#2!
Leave your applications and take part.
We are looking forward to confirming the list of members.
Good luck to all the applicants!
35  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 18, 2023, 04:11:19 PM
The questions and suggestions from the testers of the first Review are collected below. I've tried to show most of them.

Ratimov

Quote
"The maximum value within one transaction is 10 BTC, which is not that much; many mixers allow you to exchange 50 BTC. To mix large amounts, you will have to additionally communicate with support."
⌛⌛⌛ After completing all tests, we're ramping up our mixing pool soon – bigger transactions are on the horizon.

Quote
"The mixer offers up to 10 addresses to add, and they support all address formats except Taproot."
✅✅✅ We've added Taproot support now, so you're all set for every address format.

Quote
"The delay is dynamic and varies from 0 to 72 hours, which is not so much, considering that many services offer a delay of much more than 3 days, but I like that there is a breakdown here not only by hours, but also by minutes."
✅✅✅ Honestly, we've found that going beyond 72 hours doesn't make much difference.

Quote
"The weaknesses of this service are the inability to select the distribution of bitcoins by address in percentage terms, and there is also a lack of latency distribution for individual addresses."
✅✅✅ Just to clarify, since the inception of our service, we've actually had the feature to distribute bitcoins by address in percentage terms and to set latency distribution for individual addresses. Perhaps it might've been overlooked? Do check again, and let us know if you need any assistance navigating through it.

Quote
"I would also add an option for a random number of transactions, this will increase anonymity. Or you could choose how many transactions to split the bitcoins into."
✅✅✅ We've already implemented that feature. Now, our system distributes coins using 96 different sending patterns, and yep, that includes sending from various address types. We're all about upping that anonymity game.

Quote
"When you come to the mixer, select a language, then select mixing parameters, click on the Continue button, then the service, when you go to a new screen, resets your language settings and shows English by default. You have to select the language you need again."
✅✅✅ Thanks for pointing that out. We've fixed the issue, so your language preference should stick throughout the process now. Give it another go and let us know if everything's smooth.

Quote
"After creating a second separate transaction, the mixer on my first mixing produced the following error:.... What does it mean? Why did it arise? The service does not explain this in any way on the screen, you can only guess and write to support. Does the service really not like merged transactions, but no one explained this."
✅✅✅ Thanks for bringing this to our attention during the testing phase. We've now updated our platform to display descriptions for all potential errors, so users will have a clearer understanding of what's happening.

Quote
"I didn't actually send money to the deposit address more than twice, I sent it to a different address each time, but within the same transaction"
✅✅✅ Our system was initially set up to flag any non-standard behavior as a potential threat, leading to the transaction being marked as an error. Good news is, we've updated this. You can now send transactions and even increase the fee during the process. Our system won't mistake it for a double-spend, and your transaction will go through smoothly. Plus, if there's a transaction cancellation, your order will revert to its initial state, waiting for a new transaction. Hope this clears things up!

Quote
"Payment of commission to miners by the service is generous"
✅✅✅ We've made adjustments and corrected the overly generous miner fee.

Quote
"Order information expires after 24 hours, and chat history expires after 48 hours, although a feature could be added to force this history to be deleted immediately."
✅✅✅ Just a quick heads-up: we've now added a feature allowing clients to delete order information directly from the order page without waiting for the 24 hours to lapse.

Quote
"Just create a separate email for any questions and complaints, where I won’t need to remember and copy all sorts of links for chat. A separate email address is always more reliable than the internal service page."
❎ Thanks for the suggestion. However, based on the history of ChipMixer, email played a pivotal role in its shutdown. According to regulatory reports, ProtonMail might not be as anonymous and secure as many believe. So, for now, we won't be introducing email support to maintain the highest levels of security and anonymity. Hope you understand.

Quote
"I emphasize, precisely in expanded form, because the internal support chat on the mixer’s website only has a text version of the problem description;"
✅✅✅ We've completely revamped our internal chat. Lots of new features have been added, including automatic updates. We're always striving to make our platform more user-friendly and efficient.

Quote
"you can’t even attach a screenshot there."
❎ For security reasons, we don't plan to add the functionality to attach screenshots. Text-based messages provide a secure means of communicating with our support team, and we believe it's sufficient to convey any necessary information.

Quote
"Get an email account, create a telegram support, create several options for contacting service representatives so that I don’t have to remember these links for chat and at the same time keep the mixer page open to communicate with support and wait for answers."
❎ For the sake of security, we don't plan to support Telegram. Telegram's recent privacy policy changes involve disclosing user information, including IP addresses, upon regulatory request, which raises concerns about user privacy. We aim to prioritize the utmost privacy and security for our users.

Quote
"Next, I would like to note the meager set of external communication sources, which I already talked about in the Support section. There are only Twitter and Bitcointalk to choose from. Add Email, telegram, reddit, discord, anything that could increase the search and support for this service on the Internet."
❎ We currently do not intend to add any additional communication channels beyond our internal chat and Bitcointalk forum. This decision is rooted in our commitment to maintaining complete control over privacy for both us and our users. We believe this approach best aligns with our mission to provide a secure and anonymous service.

Quote
"Also, why is there no PGP fingerprint on the main page of the site?"
❎ There is no option to add the PGP fingerprint on the main page of the site without using Email for support. However, in case we need to sign any messages, we'll use the official Bitcoin address of the project - 1TUMBLRXHDjFZacmFLbuDn2Rw1rcPgacR.

Quote
"There is no referral program, but this is rather not a drawback, but a wish for the further addition of such an opportunity."
⌛⌛⌛ A referral program is on our roadmap for future additions. Your suggestion aligns with our plans for further enhancements.



Charles-Tim

Quote
"I noticed it is hard to slide those percentage to the accurate amount someone desires... ", "If possible the amount in percentage to be mixed into different addresses can be edited, it would be excellent, instead of using only fee slider."
✅✅✅ We've added a feature that allows you to use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard to make more precise adjustments to the sliders in the mixing form. This should provide a more accurate way to set the desired percentage.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



hugeblack

Quote
"Dark mode is not supported."
✅✅✅ We've added a dark mode feature. Now you can enjoy the service with a more comfortable viewing experience in low-light environments.

Quote
"Site does not work when JavaScript is disabled."
❎ We currently do not intend to implement that functionality because JavaScript is essential for the proper operation of the site. Additionally, JavaScript helps resolve various issues related to client anonymity and provides protection against DDoS attacks.

Quote
"Mixer don't have restore your order page based on TX-ID."
✅✅✅ A link to your order has been added to the guarantee letter. You can always revisit your order using this link, even after closing your browser tab.

Quote
"Remove discount system and LIFETIME DISCOUNT"
❎ We won't be removing the discount system and lifetime discount. Our system fully incorporates this functionality without compromising the anonymity of our clients. We've previously explained this feature in detail in our forum thread and discussed how the Tumbler code operates.

Quote
"Use ProtonMail to receive support requests."
❎ We don't plan to use ProtonMail for receiving support requests. Chipmixer previously used ProtonMail, but that project no longer exists.

Quote
"Add a lighter version that does not support JavaScript, such as ---> https://clean.[banned mixer]/"
❎ At the moment, we are not considering adding a lighter version that doesn't support JavaScript.

Quote
"Random service fee: The user usually chooses the lowest fee within Basic, Standard, Premium. Adding a forced random option within these levels will enhance privacy."
❎ Implementing a forced random option for service fees within the existing levels doesn't provide practical benefits, as we see that most users already choose service fees randomly to enhance privacy.

Quote
"You did not mention what will happen if the user deposits after 24 hours."
✅✅✅ A detailed response to this question has been added to the FAQ section on the project's website.

Quote
"Adding support for the Lightning Network"
❎ Support for the Lightning Network is not in our current considerations.

Quote
"Paying to a friend"
❎ We don't intend to include the 'Paying to a friend' feature in our services. This functionality is more similar to a cryptocurrency wallet feature, and our primary focus is on providing a different set of services.

Quote
"I noticed that when I received payments, the mixer was paying a lot of fees."
✅✅✅ We've made adjustments and corrected the overly generous miner fee.

Quote
"Unfortunately, this is very disappointing. I received the same coins that I sent when testing Basic, and this indicates that there is not enough stock of bitcoins or complete reliance on the tumbler code."
❎ Using the Tumbler Code is essential to avoid such issues. You can find information about it in various sections on our website.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



AHOYBRAUSE

Quote
"The discount only start from 1 btc so I guess it’s not for the average user."
❎ There are projects with higher requirements for discounts, and we consider our rates to be reasonable.

Quote
"Mandatory transaction fee seems a bit high and could be dynamic."
❎ The minimum fee helps protect our pool from de-anonymization attacks. At the time of withdrawal, the fee is dynamic and is selected based on the Bitcoin network's current load.

Quote
"FAQ, even though explaining everything well, could be written better"
✅✅✅ We've made significant improvements to the FAQ section based on feedback from testers. It now contains a wealth of new information and clarifications to better assist users.

Quote
"It would be nice if the user can choose to change how many % would go to to how many addresses in a different way, by manual input for example."
❎ This feature has actually been available since the project's inception.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Learn Bitcoin

Quote
"The website UI looks good, but I was searching to switch to Night mode as I wouldn't say I like using bright screens."
✅✅✅ We've added a dark mode feature. Now you can enjoy the service with a more comfortable viewing experience in low-light environments.

Quote
"The problem is that users must copy and save their support page link."
✅✅✅ We've taken this into account and made improvements. Now, the link to your ongoing support conversation is duplicated on the chat page, making it easier for you to continue where you left off even if you close your browser tab.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



SmartGold01

Quote
"The minimal deposit was little bit huge, I suggest the minimal deposit should be reduced and fit on 0.0005BTC or below..."
❎ The minimum deposit is an important part of our system's security measures, and we believe the current amount is set at an optimal level.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



BlackHatCoiner

Quote
"You rely on javascript. I strongly recommend you to either let people audit the code of both your front-end and back-end, or get rid of javascript completely."
❎ JavaScript (JS) plays a crucial role in maintaining the security and anonymity of our project. Without JS, the level of anonymity and functionality we offer could not be fully realized. Perhaps some of the testers who attempted to assess our service, including DDoS testing, have gained a deeper appreciation for this technology. They may have also noticed specific technical aspects while interacting with our website. In a nutshell, JS enables anonymity for both us and our clients.

Quote
"You have not DNSSEC enabled, which can significantly reduce the risk of various DNS-based attacks, such as DNS spoofing, cache poisoning, and man-in-the-middle attacks."
⌛⌛⌛ I'm sorry, but our DNS provider (DDOS-Guard) currently does not support DNSSEC, although they have promised to add this feature in the future. We do not plan to transfer the domain to another DNS provider as we have not found a suitable candidate that meets all our requirements related to anonymity and security.

Quote
"You have not set the Content-Security-Policy header (which protects from cross-site scripting)."
✅✅✅ This conclusion is incorrect. We have implemented all the necessary security headers, including the Content-Security-Policy header, since the launch of our project. You can verify this here https://securityheaders.com/

Quote
"Was this written on the go? Looks sketchy."
✅✅✅ We've made significant improvements to our FAQ section, addressing any previous issues and adding new content. Additionally, we've corrected typos on the website to enhance user experience.

Quote
"A little while later, after waiting for confirmation, I got this:"
✅✅✅ Our system was initially set up to flag any non-standard behavior as a potential threat, leading to the transaction being marked as an error. Good news is, we've updated this. You can now send transactions and even increase the fee during the process. Our system won't mistake it for a double-spend, and your transaction will go through smoothly. Plus, if there's a transaction cancellation, your order will revert to its initial state, waiting for a new transaction.

Quote
Actual mixing. When the user receives mixed coins, they have to look mixed. That's the point of the mixer; to improve fungibility and privacy, and the manner to accomplish it is to make it difficult for outsiders to de-anonymize known-mixer outputs. However, there needs to be a discernible indicator that these coins indeed originated from a mixer, so that anyone attempting to trace them can give up.
✅✅✅ Our system distributes coins using 96 different sending patterns, and yep, that includes sending from various address types. We're all about upping that anonymity game.

Quote
"Security levels". The user has no manner to verify whatsoever how their "Premium" coins are more private; which is a lie in the first place as I demonstrated. Premium coins which I expected to withdraw on different addresses, were withdrawn with direct blockchain connection. Minimum privacy there."
✅ Please note that the funds you received were from an address with a much larger sum than you requested for withdrawal. By structuring our pool into levels and using various sources of coins, we aim to protect our pool from de-anonymization, making it more costly to attack. This approach enhances the overall security and privacy of our service.

Quote
"Pricing. Please explain me why each receiving address costs an additional 20,000 sat. Your fee range of 0.4% to 3.60% is quite reasonable. However, as you've acknowledged, I didn't receive an equally good product for the price I paid when comparing the "Basic" and "Premium" options."
✅ The minimum receiving address fee is "one of the methods" to protect our pools from de-anonymization, the primary function of which is to make such an attack as expensive as possible.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



dkbit98

Quote
"Website design is ok, it's clean, and I didn't notice any big spelling mistakes, but first thing that caught my eye was Absolutely Reliable claim on main page. Either Tumbler has hired gipsy fortune teller or they have top secret time traveling machine when they are already claiming to have many positive customer reviews on forums, and they just recently started this service."
✅ It's a part of our SEO strategy! But believe us, in the future, it will be true.

Quote
"Note that after finishing my mixing I was presented with a button to write a review, and it was redirecting only to their bitcointalk forum topic."
✅ In addition to that, this button does not pass a referer, so your data remains secure (blocked at the security headers level and in the HTML code). Smiley

Quote
Fees page is saying that fees are smaller when larger amount of Bitcoin is sent for mixing, and they still boldly claim that for 100 or more BTC there is 50% discount and 0.20% service fee. I will have to say that I really suspect they have 100 or more Bitcoin, unless they are using other centralized services, but I will talk more about that later. When they first appeared in bitcointalk I asked them this question and I think they rchanged 100 btc claim to 10 btc in FAQ page, but it's still there in Fees page.
✅✅✅ A detailed response to this question has been added to the FAQ section on the project's website.

Quote
"This is where I received my first error or bug while I was testing Tumbler, and I was asked to refresh browser and continue."
✅ It's possible there was a connection interruption between your browser and our system's backend, and refreshing the page was a troubleshooting step to address this.

Quote
"I also want to use manual delete option for Support chat."
✅✅✅ We've added the option for manual deletion in the support chat.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



stompix

Quote
"Checking the first tx I was so glad they overpaid 3x times, I looked at the topic, so what the first two members had to say and...I knew it. It had to be, I knew it was coming! The other tx had the exact fee, weight, virtual size!"
✅✅✅ The problem has been resolved.

Quote
"A bit inconvenient to recreate the order page, but a good thing to put it in the letter"
✅✅✅ A link to your order has been added to the guarantee letter. You can always revisit your order using this link, even after closing your browser tab.

Quote
"...issues with replaced transactions, needs to be fixed"
✅✅✅ The problem has been resolved.

Quote
"I'm a bit concerned about those tumblers codes, how does it track the amount mixed?"
✅ We have provided a detailed explanation of how it works and why it is secure in our forum post.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



TryNinja

Quote
"Many positive customer reviews on forums speak about [banned mixer]'s reliability and solid reputation." -> maybe link some of them, otherwise it doesn't matter what you say."
✅ It's a part of our SEO strategy! But believe us, in the future, it will be true.

Quote
"what about warning people about the risk of using a third party proxy middleman and maybe recommend users to use the Tor mirror?"
⌛⌛⌛ We'll consider adding a convenient notification, but at the moment, we don't see a way to do it without compromising the usability of the site.

Quote
"A question about the tumbler code: How do you keep track of which coins are related to that user? For example, I send from my address X to your mixer address A. Then I come back later and mix again with my code. How do I *NOT* get the coins from mixer address A? If you're saving that information on your database, isn't this a privacy issue?"
✅ The Tumbler code is stored with the user themselves. The code = Reverse Encryption Algorithm ( Deposit key + Total amount ). We do not store deposit amount data and can determine a customer's discount based on the information they provide to us. We have provided a detailed explanation of how it works and why it is secure in our forum post.

Quote
"I believe coins should move around a little bit more before they are sent straight to a new customer."
✅✅✅ We have added protection, which means that for a certain period, the user will not receive their coins back, even without using the Tumbler code.

Quote
"All transactions had their change address identified by Blockchair, maybe because a 3-type address sent to a 1-type address and the change was also a 3-type address?"
✅✅✅ We've already implemented that feature! Now, our system distributes coins using 96 different sending patterns, and yep, that includes sending from various address types.

Quote
"For a third mix, I tried sending coins and then cancelling my tx though RBF. It was detected after some time and a message showed up: "An error occurred during order processing. Please "contact support (what if I resend it? Nothing showed up, so I cancelled it again)."
✅✅✅ We've now updated our platform to display descriptions for all potential errors, so users will have a clearer understanding of what's happening. Plus, if there's a transaction cancellation, your order will revert to its initial state, waiting for a new transaction.

Quote
"I wanted to try something different, so after noticing that there was no captcha required on the order page, I wrote a script that brute forces sessions as an attempt to find someone else’s randomly. Assuming a order id format "XXXXXXXX-XXXXXX" and 36 characters (A-Z/0-9), there was 36^14 possible ids. Maybe too much? Still, I wanted to try. Grin"

👓 The ORDER-ID is generated independently of any database connection, allowing for the creation of at least 1.000.000.000 unique IDs without impacting the system's performance. It simply generates a valid ID with a signature for your 'future' session using an algorithm-based approach without database involvement. We closely monitored your attempted attack. In the event of a CSRF breach and the initiation of a mass order creation, our protection mechanisms would have been activated, resulting in a denial of service. Additionally, an automatic captcha would have been triggered. Nevertheless, we appreciate your stress test, which has led to many optimizations.

Furthermore, IP blocking based on excessive requests is inherently present but currently disabled. We were curious to see where you would end up Smiley

Currently, the system is equipped to handle high loads with cluster support and includes features to protect against and filter out malicious traffic. Therefore, there is a possibility that we may no longer need the services of DDOS-Guard in the future.

Quote
"You're new, of course, but put an avatar and card on your twitter account so you don't look inactive and careless (Grin): https://twitter.com/tumbler_io"
⌛ According to our task queue, in the future, we plan to add an avatar to the Twitter/X account.

Quote
"Extra suggestion: let people deposit multiple times before they receive their coins. For example, I can send 0.001 BTC from my address A to your deposit address X + send 0.003 BTC from my address B to your deposit address Y. My output will be 0.001 + 0.003 = 0.004 BTC. This makes it so the output can also be higher than a single input transaction (A alone, or B alone)."
✅✅✅ We have created over 90 transaction sending patterns, each of which operates based on various mixing conditions.

Quote
What happens if the transaction takes longer than that to confirm?
✅✅✅ We have added extensive clarifications to the FAQ section regarding your inquiries related to order timing

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Gladitorcomeback

Quote
"A good mixer/tumbler didn't keep any type of history for long time to secure whole process. [banned mixer] keeping transaction history for 24 hours support history for 48 hours which is not good where as other competitors/mixers not keeping any log. The good thing is that we can delete this history anytime we want but automatic delete should ne reduce to atleast 24 hours."
✅✅✅ We have added the option for users to delete their tickets and information about their orders themselves.

Quote
"Review: [banned mixer] customer support is not good enough while some other mixers have very fast support services which also provide telegram support , fast enough and available 24/7."
✅ We have a system for evaluating the performance of our support team, and we will strive to improve our support system over time to provide better service.

Quote
"Only using 3 address which is easy to track which mixers used."
✅✅✅ We have created over 90 transaction sending patterns, each of which operates based on various mixing conditions.

Quote
"Over all fee is much high"
✅✅✅ The problem has been resolved.

Quote
"Sending btc after 24 would be considered loan, why not refund?"
✅✅✅ After 24 hours, if we haven't received deposit information, the order is deleted, including the deposit address and its private key. In other words, a refund becomes impossible. Added to FAQ.

Quote
"No captcha at the start which could lead to DDOS attack."
✅ The protection will only be activated in the event of an attack, we do not disrupt the use of the service unnecessarily.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



bitmover

Quote
"As you might know, when chipmixer was seized they also got their hard drives with lots of information.  I am curious about what information do you keep associated with Tumbler Code. It could be nice to share what kind of information is stored."
✅ We have provided a detailed explanation of how it works and why it is secure in our forum post.

Quote
"I suggest to upgrade all deposit addresses to native segwit format, bech32 (starting with bc1..) so everyone save money in fees."
✅✅✅ We have changed the deposit address to bech32 format, and payments may also come from other types of addresses.

Quote
"Blockchair identified the change address and classified the transaction privacy as Critical."
✅✅✅ We have analyzed all Blockchair patterns and made the necessary adjustments.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



examplens

Quote
"If we talk about dark mode, I think that black (HEX #000000) is not an ideal solution, or at least it should have one more shade."
✅ This is sepia color, we simply "inverted" the original colors.

Quote
"I believe you already know about the negative impact of anonymity when there is an intermediary between your service and the user. However, why choose DDoS-Guard, when they have a rather bad reputation?"
✅ We believe it's an excellent service operating in the "right" jurisdiction.

Quote
"When you say that you delete all logs within 24 hours at the latest, can you be sure that DDoS-Guard also not collecting any data?"
✅😁✅ By choosing DDOS-Guard, we are absolutely sure it's not CloudFlare Smiley

Quote
"AML Bot recognized the address from which I received Bitcoin as a low-risk score. Well, even though I chose almost the lowest level of anonymization, it seems satisfactory. Again, I leave open the question of how adequate AMLBot is."
✅ Our platform is not designed for satisfactory results in systems like AMLBot.
Conduct an experiment, connect 10 different addresses of yours with another 10 new addresses in your wallet in one transaction, after which each address in your wallet will have a 97% risk according to AMLBot's assessment. In this case, the AMLBot system will think that you were trying to use CoinJoin technology. Do you think this is a fair risk assessment?

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Bitcoin_Arena

Quote
"In fact, such details should put somewhere more visible and not hidden at the bottom where one has to scroll a whooping 14 pages down in order to see the bottom. It should be around 2 pages maximum."
😳😷😊 - SEO part.

Quote
"DDoS protection service. The service uses DDoS Guard to protect itself against DDoS attacks, which can turn out to be a loophole in the future for a service that promises its customers ultimate privacy. With the dangers DDoS Guard could pose, I think you should look for alternative ways. Better safe than sorry."
✅ We consider DDOS-Guard to be a very good service. It is better than its competitors that are located in questionable jurisdictions.

Quote
"The support for other available languages is pretty good, except for the Terms and Privacy."
❎ We do not plan to translate the Terms and Privacy (at least for now).

Quote
"Once the 24 hours have passed, this order page should expire or the deposit address should be hidden if it has not received any deposit with instructions to the user to start the mixing process afresh. Refreshing it bring this error message, which is persistent. Please fix"
✅ It's possible there was a connection interruption between your browser and our system's backend, and refreshing the page was a troubleshooting step to address this. In the future, there are improvements intended for the part that manages this connection.

Quote
"I am not really satisfied with how the coins are mixed and can easily help the Chainalysis experts or services connect the dots without much effort."
✅✊✅ We disagree with you. Currently, our mixing algorithms and payout patterns are the most advanced in the market. In the event of an order, with the recommended mixing settings, you would encounter significant difficulties with de-anonymizing your new addresses as an analyzer.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Trofo

Quote
"Why is there a need for captcha? Never seen that on mixer before. Are there bots using mixing services and even if there are why would that be a problem if they are paying same fees."
✅ Captcha is automatically enabled in case of an abnormal number of new orders.

Quote
"Backend needs a lot of work to reach the level of best mixers out there. First there is a feeling like there should be much more funds available."
⌛⌛⌛ Once we're done with all the testing, we'll be boosting our mixing pool.

Quote
"Would also like to read much more about how actual mixing works (what is happening with our BTC on Tumbler wallets)."
⌛⌛ In future updates, we will add more technical information to our website about how mixing works.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Hamza2424

Quote
"While Reviewing the Mixed coins privacy I would like to add that the privacy level of the mixed coins on the Basic standard is average, it made a score of 60 points and easily got tracked, and immediately Blockchain linked both my receiving addresses I think it could have been more efficient if we had increased the transaction delay."
✅✅✅ We have analyzed all Blockchair patterns and made the necessary adjustments.

Quote
"First of I would like to mention that there's a bug in the support chat."
✅✅✅ The problem has been resolved. The chat has been completely redesigned.

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Wind_FURY

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



GeorgeJohn

All other issues you've mentioned have already been addressed and resolved as described in the previous responses.



Potato Chips

Quote
"I guess there is no video."
⌛⌛⌛ Video is in development. Deadline is by the end of the year.

Quote
"Another thing I noticed is the big/inflated claims which I’m not a fan of."
✅✅✅ We have corrected many texts.

Quote
"To improve this, I would suggest showing an “invalid address” error next time so it’s more clear for the end user."
✅✅✅ We've now updated our platform to display descriptions for all potential errors, so users will have a clearer understanding of what's happening.

Quote
"Furthermore, the change address from my first mix was used for my second mix."
✅✅✅ The sending system has been revamped.



Faisal2202

Quote
"You guys should add the total receiving amount too when we increase the number of receiving addresses. You can add that section right there where I marked red. It will come more handy while keeping track of how much we are paying on fee and how much we are going to receive in total. I had to use a calculator. I know none of the other Mixers I have experienced, have this feature besides just a simple fee calculator, but it will be super comfy and UI will become more user-friendly."
✅✅✅ We have added the feature you recommended. Now, you can see the total receiving amount when you increase the number of receiving addresses. We hope this makes tracking your payments and fees more convenient.

Quote
"It would be great if we would manually write the percentage to allocate to each address (when we add more then one receiving addresses). But most of the mixer don't have this feature too, I think its on purpose. And just to add, I really liked the strategy of not allowing users to divide the amount into equal parts like in 50% 50% parts. No matter how much I tried but we can't divide them in equal parts. First I thought that's due to the slider but later I came to remember that they have already wrote on their website that..."
✅✅✅ We've added a feature that allows you to use the left and right arrow keys on your keyboard to make more precise adjustments to the sliders in the mixing form. This should provide a more accurate way to set the desired percentage.

Quote
"Whenever I write something and want to send it I have to click on the send button, while it should also be done by clicking enter key on the keyboard, it also did not work with shift+Enter. Which means, we have to click via mouse on the send option."
⌛⌛⌛ We appreciate your suggestion, and we plan to add the functionality to send messages by pressing the Enter key on the keyboard in the future. Your input helps us improve the user experience.

Quote
"We all know that, Twitter has rebranded to "X" even though the domain is not changed yet, but the Logo is changed in all over the world. So, you should also use the up-to-date logo of Twitter (opps), of "X" in the bottom. Acceptance of new changes increase impression."
✅✅✅ We have updated the logo for "X", to ensure it is current and accurate, as you suggested.

Quote
"A link can be given for users to direct go to the page you are referring to, Because it will be hard for newbies to search about Tumbler on BTT. More ease for the users will show more devotion and users will feel comfy with you."
✅✅✅ We have added links to the service thread on the BitcoinTalk forum for easier access and convenience for our users.

Quote
"I think you guys are trying to say --> Send the BTC to the address while you wrote "Send the transfer to the address." It is really very confusing while reading the website content, please correct it."
✅✅✅ The sentence has been corrected.

Quote
"Your website name is [banned mixer] <-- last io are in small letters, but in your website content, you wrote io as IO (in capital letters) which seems to be unprofessional and not really good too. I suggest you guys to use the io everywhere. It would also help to rank your main keyword."
✅✅✅ We have corrected these details in the website text.





Thanks to all the testers, we've tried to resolve all possible issues, and a tremendous amount of work has been done.
We look forward to the second round of testing!
Thank you all!
36  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 18, 2023, 02:51:53 PM
I'm glad to inform you that the first round of Bitcoin Mixer Review is completed and a great job has been done, in the next message I will provide a complete list of all edits.
37  Economy / Services / Re: [banned mixer] AVATAR Contest | Reward for Everyone on: October 10, 2023, 11:18:52 AM
🎉 And... drum roll... xLays, you nailed it! 1st prize, $200, and a whoppin' 50% lifetime discount is all yours!

Thank you! Since I also won in the Signature Design Contest and will receive another lifetime 40% discount, does that mean I'll receive a total of 90% lifetime discount code?

To be honest, I think I've only used a Bitcoin mixer once. So, Is it possible to convert the lifetime discount that I will receive from signature design contest into BTC instead?

Regards!

Hey!
Nailing top spots in two contests? Seriously impressive! You've clearly got mad design skills.
Just so you know, that 50% discount you bagged? It's the absolute max discount our service offers. Quite the catch! Contest rules are what they are.
I get that sometimes prizes can feel like that birthday gift you've already got.
But hey, life's full of surprises.
Nevertheless, big congrats on snagging the first place in one of the contests! Ride that wave! 🥇🤘
38  Other / Archival / Re: ➡️➡️ [ANN] | 🇹‌🇺‌🇲‌🇧‌🇱‌🇪‌🇷‌.🇮‌🇴‌ | Bitcoin Mixer ⬅️⬅️ on: October 10, 2023, 10:43:58 AM
If you have time on your hands to work on some SEO optimization  it will be nice to see you rank on the first page of Google with the "[banned mixer]" search  Smiley
Yes, that is important, let's make it natural as Yomix did. I am not sure they use SEO to optimize it, I am really sure Yomix did it naturally because they are good in marketing. So if [banned mixer] want be o top searching let do the same what yomix did by create the signature campaign and masive marketing on social media. The important thing 1st is to make people believe if [banned mixer] is Trusted. So if people already believe, the ranking will be shifted to the top place naturally.


To everything there is a season, blue Snow
39  Economy / Services / Re: [CFNP][banned mixer] AVATAR Contest | Reward for Everyone | Winner gets $200+ on: October 10, 2023, 10:25:34 AM

Hey everyone!

Big news on the Avatar Design Contest. Hats off to everyone who sent in their designs – you folks are just amazing!

🎉 And... drum roll... xLays, you nailed it! 1st prize, $200, and a whoppin' 50% lifetime discount is all yours!

🎉 PX-Z, you're up next! 2nd place and 40% off for life. Seriously cool stuff!

🎉 Rounding it out at 3rd is demonica with a 40% lifetime discount. Way to go!

A big fist bump to everyone else.
You're all getting a 10% discount for life 'cause, why not?
Cheers!
40  Economy / Services / Re: [CFNP][banned mixer] Signature Design Contest|Reward for Everyone|Winner gets $300+ on: October 10, 2023, 10:19:54 AM

Heya, designers!

Time to spill the beans on the Signature Design Contest. Man, choosing was tough with all those killer designs!

🥇 jayce, take a bow! 1st spot, $300, and a fat 50% lifetime discount. Rock on!

🥈 xLays, you're on fire! Snagged the 2nd spot and 40% off for good.

🥉 And not forgetting rat03gopoh, 3rd place with a neat 40% discount. High five!

Huge thanks to everyone who jumped in. All of you are bagging a 10% lifetime discount.

Cheers!
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!