Bitcoin Forum
April 19, 2024, 05:23:58 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 150 »
1781  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Bitcoin wallet to avoid on: February 05, 2022, 09:33:20 AM
it is better to use a none custodial wallet that you are in control of the keys to be able to restore the wallet on any other wallet provider app or site.

It's even better if you choose non custodial and open source wallet with decent reputation.

This wallet is too familiar as a scam in this forum, there have been many accusations and problems in the past and even once locked Elonmusk funds. LOL
You can PM this guy or their official thread if your balance has not been credited, and create a thread or move this thread on the scam accusations board if you don't get a response.
Thanks for your reply I have contacted they support and all they could say it that there is deposits delay on their server that I have to wait for the issue to get resolved.

Ask them how long you'll need to wait until the "issue" resolved, IMO they expect you'll forget about the issue soon by giving vague answer.
1782  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is keysend the best way to transfer custom data between peers with lightning? on: February 04, 2022, 11:16:43 AM
Is there any other way?. I'm thinking that maybe lnurl can be used to transfer custom data somehow, but haven't explored that path yet.

You could abuse comment field in payRequest to send small amount of data. But both peer must explicitly enable comment field and it's limited by 2000 character on the URL (which also contain payment information), so it's more practical to use comment field to send notes/download link instead.
1783  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin literally fixes this on: February 03, 2022, 12:27:20 PM
I don't disagree with your statement, but it's like comparing apples with oranges. Bitcoin is cryptocurrency while GoFundMe is crowdfunding platform. They could suffer from similar fate as long as they rely on centralized service (e.g. BitPay).
1784  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Is it possible to recover overwritten wallet files? on: February 03, 2022, 10:40:00 AM
Doesn't "previous version" feature on Windows is disabled by default?
By default, it's enabled for the drive you have installed windows on.
As electrum wallet files are stored on the same drive as windows is installed, previous versions should be automatically saved for them.
The problem is that restore points aren't created every time you make change to a file.

The following image has been taken from "Properties" window of the folder my electrum wallets files are stored in.
As you see, three restore points have been created in the past 30 days.



Thanks for the information. While it's better than no backup, another problem is "Previous Version" use low percentage of partition space. If the partition space is really small and user frequently write files, it's possible Electrum wallet files won't be or less frequently backed up.
1785  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Risk assesment of hardware-based exploits on the network on: February 01, 2022, 12:57:12 PM
Is there a way to get a list of which hardware is being used for nodes on the network and sort it on a list? I assume many people take extra steps to not leak this data so probably we can't get a good idea of what hardware is sustaining the network.

Exact hardware (CPU brand, CPU type, etc.)? I doubt it. But we do know some Bitcoin nodes run on VPS. It's indicated by Bitcoin node IP which is in IP range of certain VPS provider. Those VPS provider usually state their hardware specification, so you could get minimum number of node which use modern Intel/AMD CPU.
1786  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How to start wallet development? on: February 01, 2022, 12:50:02 PM
Depending on your end goal, contribute to or privately modify existing open-source wallet should be better option since you could reuse existing component and avoid create new/re-implement existing standard.
1787  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Looking for a Simple Buy bitcoin Api or a No code dapp builder for same on: January 31, 2022, 11:36:40 AM
The one service that came close was paxful virtual bitcoin kiosk which is not clear how to use, but it has exactly what I want to do.

Another service that i know is https://ramp.network/. There are multiple ways to integrate it with your website/application, but there's easy way by adding 1 HTML tag (https://docs.ramp.network/web/quick-start-hosted/).

P.S. i never use this service, so you should additional research (such as their ToS).
1788  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Totally Noob: How to check That Your Private Key Is Random on: January 31, 2022, 10:02:50 AM
  • randomly
  • unique (as same level as electrum)

How about this?

Code:
xxd -l 32 -ps /dev/urandom
# 1bcfc845367bb56264f8fba8886fefa86294ac96c86ef269f1ad208b1b1faa48

Please: Dont say just download electrum or any other well-reviewed software.

Why not? It's most practical option if you're not cryptography/math expert.
1789  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What does a non-mining node do for the network? on: January 30, 2022, 11:40:18 AM
I don't think any "ASIC resistant" algorithm would be desirable to implement. All it would do would be to make it more difficult to develop ASICs, and there is always the risk that the person advocating for a particular algorithm has already done some research on how to create ASICs for that algorithm.
So far based on what I've seen ASIC resistant meant you can't use bitcoin SHA256d ASICs to mine that algorithm but creation of an application-specific integrated circuit (ie. ASIC) is very well possible. Even those that tried using more memory with memory expensive algorithms ended up having ASICs.

While i agree with your statement, very few ASIC-resistant perform good enough. For example, developing Ethash ASIC took long time and it's efficiency isn't very big against GPU (if you compare efficiency between GPU and ASIC with different ASIC-resistant algorithm). RandomX also looks promising, but time will tell how well it perform.

P.S. Do we even want an ASIC resistant algorithm?

As long as there's multiple competitor on SHA-256 ASIC, i would say no.
1790  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: [warning] Vulnerability in all major Linux distros gives full root privileges. on: January 27, 2022, 10:11:11 AM
And that's why you shouldn't run random application/script you found on internet, even if you use Linux.

This might be a bigger issue for a business that allows multiple employees to access a machine that has access to the business's hot wallet (or other secrets). In those cases, this is something that needs to be patched ASAP.

Application with lots of dependency also risky, i expect someone will try to perform supply chain attack on programming library.
1791  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Massive list of Bitcoin-friendly VPS /VPNproviders on: January 27, 2022, 09:48:59 AM
They did conclude, however, that:
Quote
However, for developers and business owners, BitLaunch can provide a great value for money and keep their privacy intact throughout the process, which is a rare commodity in this day and age.
Since your question regarding the pricing and specification/type of VPS they offered was still standing, I decided to create a dummy account to explore within. When you want to create a server you are presented with a wide array of options:

--snip--

As an aside, you are only able to "launch" the VPS if you fund your account with money - which, as far as I'm aware, is only possible by either using Bitcoin, Ethereum or Litecoin.

Thanks for your effort, i appreciate it. But it's almost 3 times of original, no wonder they require you to sign up to see the spec/price. There's better alternative such as SporeStack (https://sporestack.com) which is accountless and cheaper.
1792  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Private Key recovery from WIF format on: January 25, 2022, 12:12:00 PM
--snip--
Code:
10989651.89 * $0.332 = $3,648,564.4 (about 87 BTC when i write this post)
Using my program numbers look more optimistic:
on vast.ai single rtx3090 costs 0.414, single rtx3080Ti costs 0.314. I think their performance is similar (maybe paying 25% less for 3080Ti makes sense, I do not know now).
On rtx3090 I measured performance around 3450Mkeys. It gives 58^11/3450000000/3600s = 2011807 hours => $832 888

According to Wikipedia, RTX 3080 Ti and RTX 3090 have very similar TFLOPs. So it should be cheaper to rent 3080 Ti where you could reduce the cost up to 25% (rough estimation).

Code:
            | Half            | Single          | Double
RTX 3080 Ti | 27.955 (34.100) | 27.955 (34.100) | 0.437 (0.533)
RTX 3090    | 29.284 (35.581) | 29.284 (35.581) | 0.458 (0.556)

Anyway, the question is where to find - let's say - 6000 cards to solve it in +-2 weeks...

I expect you'll need to register to many GPU renting marketplace and VPS provider. But VPS provider usually offer enterprise GPU instead (such as A5000) which is far more expensive.
1793  Economy / Reputation / Re: [Discussion] Bitcointalk Community Awards 🏆 on: January 25, 2022, 11:56:34 AM
I need clarification, does that mean full member or higher with 0 merit eligible to vote?
True ... but I added a note saying that the OP has the discretion to ignore the votes of newly awakened accounts and inactive posters.

Quote

I saw the note, but it doesn't say anything about active account which never/almost never receive merit. But i trust you'll ignore vote from obvious abuser.
1794  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Do Web Hosting Providers Accept BTC? on: January 25, 2022, 11:53:30 AM


Your VPS is far more expensive than most popular VPS provider (such as Linode). With those price, i could find different VPS provider (which accept BTC) with better privacy policy or better specification. Additionally, you linux image is a bit outdated, i couldn't find Debian 10 or Ubuntu 20.04 LTS. I would advice you to take more time to setup your service before announce/promote your service.
1795  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Best Linux distro to run a full node on: January 24, 2022, 11:47:57 AM
I just want to ask if anyone had used "Tails" Debian-based Linux distribution for running a full node yet... and if you did, what was your experience with it? I use "Tails" as a portable operating system to preserve my privacy and anonymity, but I would want to try to use it for a Full node too... but for that I will have to enable the persistent storage ..which might compromise that.  Huh

Do you guys have a easy to use tutorial to run a Full node on Tails? I know people who have tried before and they had several issues with the restrictive default firewall rules.  Roll Eyes

What you need isn't Tails which specifically designed as live OS. You should check different linux-distro such as Whonix and Qubes. For Whonix, you can check this guide https://www.whonix.org/wiki/Bitcoin_Core.

If you're willing to try newer linux distro, check Created a Hardened Linux OS for Crypto Hodlers.

but if I can figure out how to make a CMD batch file or powershell script that makes the Bitcoin service run on Windows, that would be nice too.

It's should possible with "hack" like this, https://www.howtogeek.com/50786/using-srvstart-to-run-any-application-as-a-windows-service/.
1796  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What happens to your network if bitcointalk go offline on: January 24, 2022, 11:16:19 AM
A lot of people might hop across to stack overflow or reddit.

Stackoverflow is great place for technical question/problem, but it's not meant for casual discussion.

--snip--
So now, how this forum become offline if it seems we are in the decentralized website?

Bitcointalk is centralized, so it's possible this forum going offline.
1797  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Foundation Passport (FE) hardware wallet review and walkthrough on: January 23, 2022, 12:19:46 PM
I didn't expect someone would review $299 device (excluding possible import tax and shipping cost). But with such high cost, i'm really annoyed they don't bother include rechargeable lithium AAA when they include industrial class microSD.

  • microSD: This is a method that the Passport itself offers, but I find very risky. As soon as you insert an SD card into a computer, basically any process and any unprivileged app running on it, that has filesystem access (most of them, even the browser..) can read and modify the contents of that SD card. It should be pretty easy to write a background program that waits for SD cards and replaces PSBT files on the fly.

IMHO, if people choose FE rather than other hardware wallet (such as Ledger and Trezor) which is cheaper and easier to use, it's more likely they have better secure practice. I wouldn't worry about malicious application which replace PBST file if you perform good security practice and verify the transaction before sign/broadcast process.

If they can fix the insufficient battery life, lower the price, and manage to create a HW that won't suffer major security issues and vulnerabilities in the future, this would be something I would consider purchasing for long-term storage. At the moment, it isn't.     

I doubt it's easy to lower the price when it's still assembled in U.S which have high wage cost.
1798  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What does a non-mining node do for the network? on: January 23, 2022, 11:48:57 AM
Quote
First of all, how would consensus work when are 2 different PoW (SHA-256 and other algorithm for CPU) on the network?
Currently, changing the mining algorithm from SHA-256d to something different is not needed. All that is needed to decentralize mining, is receiving smaller amounts of coins without having to trust any centralized mining pools. I can imagine people moving single satoshis, millisatoshis, or maybe smaller amounts in decentralized way. The algorithm can be the same, as long as it is not broken.

I agree it's not needed to change SHA-256 and it'd be great to reduce dominance of centralized pool. However, i'm not talking about changing SHA-256, but running 2 algorithm together since i assumed that's what @itel meant.
1799  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin and smart contracts (RGB Protocol) on: January 23, 2022, 10:44:43 AM
For those interested, you can read more about it here[1][2].

[1] https://bitcoinmagazine.com/guides/a-brief-introduction-to-rgb-protocols
[2] https://rgb-org.github.io/

Their GitHub repository[1] also contains lots of resource (mostly PDF slide and video). But personally i only check concept PDF slide[2] and part of their FAQ[3]

[1] https://github.com/LNP-BP/presentations
[2] https://github.com/LNP-BP/FAQ/blob/master/Presentation%20slides/RGB%20%26%20Spectrum%20explanation%20for%20business.pdf
[3] https://www.rgbfaq.com/

I would also like to know what are your thoughts on it and how big of an impact it could have on bitcoin.

While there are many parts i don't understand, there are few over-estimated promises/offer. For example (on concept PDF slide page 13),
1. Zero storage cost is simply impossible when you utilize Bitcoin blockchain (to store the smart contract state).
2. Extreme scalability is limited by Bitcoin network and Lightning Network channel/routing.

Talking about impact, it heavily depends on availability of user-friendly software which support RGB (and related protocol such as Spectrum). But assuming it's available, IMO it has similar impact with LN.
1800  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: What does a non-mining node do for the network? on: January 22, 2022, 11:43:13 AM
Why not to add a 'slow' CPU mining option to the full-node software?

Am I missing something here?

First of all, how would consensus work when are 2 different PoW (SHA-256 and other algorithm for CPU) on the network?

Additionally when it comes to doing work we have no way of distinguishing what hardware was used to perform that work. In other words someone could build a new ASIC to mine the new "slow CPU mining option" and we would be right back where we started.

Even without ASIC, someone could simply build CPU farm (just like miner build GPU farm). Besides, used CPU/server rack sometimes could be found really cheap on online shop.
Pages: « 1 ... 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 [90] 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 ... 150 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!