 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
|
Awesome, thank you!
I just joined the discord and hopefully will start there.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I'm interested in starting with Idena and would appreciate an invite.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Sent as well!
If you have more forms like this, I'm interested.
|
|
|
|
breel: no, it's not the same issue, you need to read the new readme instructions on how to build now. it can't be the same issues unless you found a way to run MinGW on linux.
Indeed! |
|
|
|
I'm also getting an issue in Linux with the jansson submodule :/ make[2]: Entering directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-sgminer-dev-git/src/sgminer/submodules'
Making all in jansson
make[3]: Entering directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-sgminer-dev-git/src/sgminer/submodules/jansson'
make[3]: *** No rule to make target 'all'. Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-root/aur-sgminer-dev-git/src/sgminer/submodules/jansson' |
|
|
|
I should also mention that changes to sgminer might be needed to accomodate this new kernel. I don't have any plans to do it. no need to worry about reverse engi it atm, but your work is appreciated. just use pool gaurd. to the person who made this updated kernal, thanks but we pay enough in fees with pools and transfers. I have already reversed it  , I posted the kernel with the supposed speed improvements. http://pastebin.com/XxLpewZH But it might not work without making sgminer compatible !Replaced darkcoin.cl with yours posted, no speed increase in sph-sgminer. You have to delete the .bin files and try again. Didn't work for me either  I replaced the contents of darkcoin.cl with what was linked. I deleted all .bin files besides the one I use to launch sgminer. Using sgminer 4.1.0-96-g983e. Miner wouldn't even start for me so I'm probably doing something wrong... As I mentioned this before, it is possible it doesn't work without modifying sgminer to work with it. Strange though, a user claimed it compiled the kernel for him. Your paste bin has a typo (missing the first '/') but even with that, it still crashes the GPU... so not sure what else is missing. |
|
|
|
Shouldn't the last person not make anything in a ponzi scheme game? |
|
|
|
did you run autogen.sh? if not you have to
yes i've run ./autogen.sh sph-sgminer$ ./autogen.sh
libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'.
libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'.
libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4'
libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'.
libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh'
libtoolize: putting macros in AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR, `m4'.
libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4'
libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4' then i cant help you :S nothing i can do without access. when you run configure and it fails, check the config.log for the last entries. it should tell you why it failed. i can give you access? teamviewer? im so desperate to get this working. what version of libcurl do you have installed? Maybe the one from your distro is just too old |
|
|
|
Not if you are mining myriad with x11 or qubit algo. Won't mining using these algos not get your GPU to the same temperature as Scrypt? If not, why would that be? Do they use less of the cpu? Thank you! Scrypt is more memory-intensive and so the GPU will draw more power and generate more heat. Oh that's interesting. But I don't understand, how the fact that it uses less memory means less power drawn. Does the card only power up the memory chips used? Thanks! |
|
|
|
Not if you are mining myriad with x11 or qubit algo. Won't mining using these algos not get your GPU to the same temperature as Scrypt? If not, why would that be? Do they use less of the cpu? Thank you! |
|
|
|
|
Can't the mods just ban this guy from creating more accounts on the board?
|
|
|
|
|
I'll read that thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
@jl2012: Yes these are correct questions.
1- In the non-virtual world, I believe that person would lose anything gained from a thief (in case of a suit of course), that could apply to a virtual currency. You could add delay between being able to send newly received funds, but that seems like a major hassle for the overall population so maybe not a good idea.
2- Well that's part of the risk of course, would the cons be greater than the pros? maybe.
3- If it is done at the user level, I doubt people want to manually keep up with small stuff it'd be a hassle.
Probably the same if some organizations are in charge of "blacked lists".
I suspect it would be mostly focusing on the BIG ones, like Sheep, Gox, etc. In these cases it probably makes no difference if the claim is legit or not (ie if an external thieft came in, or it was an internal job, both end up with the same result)
But you didn't reply to my question about the fiat, why?
In no part I assumed I knew exactly how something like this would work, I am merely asking the question.
(most of us didn't know how to get a P2P currency and yet we have one now...)
|
|
|
|
No, there is no "on the other hand".
Why is that? |
|
|
|
Great post!
On the other hand it'd be great to have a way to "invalidate" the stolen coins, that would only affect the thief that could not spend the coins anymore...
All the other coins would increase in value, so that's good for the community as a whole, even if it does not repay the people whom the coins were stolen from.
This invalidation/block could be optional of course.
I think if something like this could work, it would also reduce the potential issues in the future.
How to judge and who will judge? The court? Then why don't you simply use fiat? Maybe each user could judge for himself? Or maybe we could have blacklist plugins that can read list of "blacklisted coins", kind of like AdBlock Plus can get various list of Ads to filter. Then users would just opt in or out of these. How do I refuse stolen fiat money? there is no way for me to know that any coin/bill is stolen... but with the blockchain it may be feasible. |
|
|
|
You do understand you will never convince miners to erase 3,000 blocks of the blockchain however if you did, then Bitcoin is done. Remember over those 3,000 blocks, newly mined coins have been involved in transactions and this action would double spend all of those. The coins originally minted would never exist and thus the coins spent wouldn't. Merchants, other users, exchanges would all see the downstream transactions (which have 6 ro 3,000+ confirmations) suddenly go unconfirmed and invalid.
While this in theory could be done at any time it is generally accepted to be impossible. If miners by decree can double spend transaction not 1 or 2 confirmations into the blockchain but 3,000 blocks deep then no receiver can ever be sure that the transaction is irreversible. There is a certain level of faith in all currencies that create the perception of value, and Bitcoin is no exception. Among those faiths, Bitcoin users believe that while it is possible in theory to 51% the network and undo transactions thousands of blocks deep, that it would have such an economic cost that it infeasible. All users accept this faith or they wouldn't be using bitcoin (or would require 10,000+ confirmations before concluding the transaction). Your proposed action (although I think it has no chance) if successful would break that faith. Without faith in the irreversibility of transactions, there is no value or utility to Bitcoin. Bitcoin would be dead. I am not talking the exchange rate goes down a bit and recovers, I mean completely abandoned as a worthless experiment and development moves on to future systems which don't have the vulnerability (likely some floating checkpoint system which acts as a check to the proof of work).
How do you use a currency that at any time could simply be "undone" and erased from your wallet by the actions of a third party? Would you use that currency? I know I wouldn't. I genuinely feel sorry for those who lost significant amounts of money by misplacing their trust in MtGox but this is a situation where the cure is worse than the disease.
Great post! On the other hand it'd be great to have a way to "invalidate" the stolen coins, that would only affect the thief that could not spend the coins anymore... All the other coins would increase in value, so that's good for the community as a whole, even if it does not repay the people whom the coins were stolen from. This invalidation/block could be optional of course. I think if something like this could work, it would also reduce the potential issues in the future. |
|
|
|
Hmmm, I've tried to do the same and followed this transaction: https://blockchain.info/address/1NwuCH9szpshHZoKJ6AsCLUYFu39rN2jsjbut I eventually ended up in a tumbler (no proof, bug huge amount of BTC moving every few minutes for a few days in February...). Of course, that might just have been my luck and that was some of the coins stolen from the malleability issue. |
|
|
|
|
