IMO "mixer" is wrong term to use for bisq which is just a platform for p2p trading. A mixer by definition requires some kind of centralization, where as with bisq it is just regular trades from one person to other. Even if btc/xmr atomic swaps got implemented, assuming that it stays entirely p2p, I think it is very hard to make the legal argument against it without actually outlawing XMR altogether.
Bisq is a great project and I am looking forward to bisq2 getting developed further. The easy protocol in bisq2 seems good for people with no existing btc but for a seller the lower cost barrier of entry seems less favorable especially for payment platforms with high chargeback risk.
I havent followed bisq2 that closely, I just hope they are planning for protocols similar to bisq1 as well.
Having a discussion section in the program sounds actually really good and I see great potential in regular users being able to discuss various trading related things and to keep up with the development.