I guess you already have a NAS setup? Your servers running the nodes also need to be able to mount a NFS volume. Go to your bitcoin.conf and set the datadir to your newly mounted volume.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/4r48oa/running_a_node_with_the_database_on_a/d4yolwm/

This link has a lot of information that's going to be useful to you.

Everyone here is talking about Pokerstars...

And I have to admit that I am yet to find a BTC accepting site that is reliable.
Most of them are either proved scams like betcoin or really poorly made gambling site like Nitrogen...

Never knew about this myself since I usually stick to gambling on my PC which is why this was a good thread to check out in my case. I have an android mobile which is why I too will check out android apps for gambling soon.

I play poker on PokerStars regularly and I especially liked the UI of their website when compared to some other poker sites.

The offers are ok in my opinion and the tutorials are helpful. I will be checking out the relevant android apps soon.

---
Thanks everyone and again, apologies for this minor New Years hiccup 

I wonder what will happening if the wallet hacked. To maintain security of the wallet, i think it must be a huge responsibility to do that.
In fiat currency, if you lost your bank account, you may can recover your account with the bank help. But in crypto, once you lose your account, you cannot recover it back if your account already drained out.

still not credited 250 bits. does admin rarely come online?

@jeremypwr

I think there's been a mistake in the payments for last week. I should've received 0.005 for week (12/24 -12/31), instead, I've received 0.015  Waiting for your reply.

  HAHA....Keep on playing..you are bound to win someday.

 Are you in my loaded Denarium raffle here?>>>  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5091347.0

And the winner starts with a KING name like yours  

Alrighty then! Lets roll with 556703  

Goodluck to ye all!~

Yeah I know but I can't afford to keep it in crypto at this moment.

firstly my goal in this challenge is to build fiat value and not crypto amount. So I can't afford to keep in crypto in the evening and wake up it dropped to much and see a couple of days work vanished.
But I do set buy order before going to bed.I mostly set my buys 5-15% lower as the value @ time of going to sleep.

One of the following days or weeks I am also starting the same challenge with the same amount but then I will try to build as much crypto as possible.

So if I stay in BTC overnight in that one it does not matter cause the BTC value will remain the same. But I rather do not have open positions when going to sleep. I could put up stop loss but I rather have only open positions when I am trading during the day and take some smaller profits than hoping there will be a bounce at night. In this way I try to avoid too many losses. At this moment I did not close any position at a loss. After 12 days every single trade got closed with profit and thats the way I like it.

It is never "negative" when you follow the best practice even if you don't know the reason for it.

I've already pointed out this flaw and also pointed out that it is the same with any other decentralized way of doing it. You can't prevent people from registering any address with any name no matter what method you use.

I set up an electrum wallet, and it seemed to give me the option to add a custom word, which i did. So there were 13 words and the word I added was not from the pool of words.
So I tried to put the seed into a wallet but nothing showed.

TBH it's a bit of a ballsup as i wasn't 100% sure which 12 word seed I used before the word i added, so i tried all my seeds

First of all this is encouraging address reuse which should be avoided.

Secondly you are complicating things by a lot! Try to think simpler and try to stick with what bitcoin already offers.
Let's see what you want to do.
You want to link a bitcoin address to another "information" which can be anything including Email, phone number, website link,...
So why not use OP_Return?

It offers all you want. It signs a "message" so the owner of the key would be clear and it can include any "information" in it. You just have to make a new transaction from that address and include that "information" inside a OP_Return output.
Like this (the link to my github page):
Then all the clients have to do is to search the blockchain for OP_Return outputs and build a local database from them.

It inherits the same flaws as your proposed system as it encourages address reuse and also it has no mechanism from stopping anyone from linking anything to anything because of decentralization!

It can be used to debunk all the FUD posts that spring up all over this forum and other online sites whenever a large amount of bitcoin is moved. For a period of two weeks or so in December, we had at least one new topic every day posting about how "a whale" was moving 600k bitcoin, which they were definitely about to dump and bitcoin was going to crash to zero. By knowing that the addresses in question were actually Coinbase's cold storage, and they were simply moving the bitcoin from their current cold storage system to a new one, it was easy to point this out and stop the rising panic amongst all the newbies who believe everything they read at face value.

----

oclVanitygen generates addresses by using OpenCL. OpenCL can run on GPUs, in contrast to C. After OpenCL thinks an address it created has the expected prefix, it passes the private key (actually the delta value of it), the calculated P2PKH hash and the idx value to the C part of the software. When the GPU calculated hash doesn't match the CPU calculated hash, it dumps the info for debugging.

Short Answer: It would, of course, have printed the private key if it had found an address with the expected prefix.

I'm wondering if there are any blueprints for such an idea, I think it would be quite easy to do and broadcast people's addresses from a client when an email or a phone number gets input.

This could be integrated with a few clients beyond that, I'm wondering if the solution already exists? The idea being someone takes an address and signed message from it in a way that verifies an email or phone number, a valid from date and a valid to date. Probably run similar to a DNS setup.