33 chain=0 msg="is_temp_return @ design 110 valid return nun.+ time="2025-04-29
12:28:28" level=error pid=24033 chain=0 error="asic num error" msg="detected asic num less than design(0<110)"
time="2025-04-29 12:28:28"
level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="detect chip num 0 design num 110"
time="2025-04-29 12:28:29"
level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="is_temp_return @ design 110 valid return_num:*
time="2825-84-29 12:28:32"
level=error pid=24033 chain=0 error="asic num error" msg="detected asic num less than design(0<110)*
time="2025-04-29 12:28:32"
level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="detect chip num ® design num 110"
time="2025-04-2912:28:33"
level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="is_temp_return 0 design
time="2025-84-29 12:28:36"
level=error pid=24033 chain=0 error="asic num error" msg="detected asic num less
time="2025-84-29 12:28:36"
level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="detect chip num 0 design num 110"
time="2025-84-29
12:28:36 level=error pid=24033 chain=0 msg="failed getting chip temp"
time="2025-04-29
12:28:36" level=fatal pid=24033 chain=0 msg="read no sensor chip temp
time="2025-04-29 12:28:36"
level=fatal pid=24033 chain=® msg="uneffective temp exceed limit (3), uneffective_value_count = 4!"
time="2025-04-29 12:28:36" level=notice pid=24033 chain=0 msg="chain 0, chip temperature array:
-64
-64 -64 -64 -64 -64 -64 -64 -64 -64 -64
NE
This log was from back when I started the 4th one in the miner room, I feel like it threw off the airflow balance.
Only 1 random one out of the 4 would turn off and 3 would remain running at a stable level.
(So for example could be miner number 2 or miner number 3, the problem isn’t specifically with 1 of the miners.)
