This is the earliest transaction which has to reach 100 confirmations, before it can be spent. It is 73 now. The rest of the transactions are horribly chained after that, so, it could be a while...
|
|
|
|
so im wondering if friedcat is using blockchain.info wallet
Are you actually serious? lol I would love to lol too, but I remember that not so long ago friedcat left 1k+ btc on glbse...  |
|
|
|
Qual é o prazo de pagamento?
Posso passar minha ordem pra alguém?
No, if I'm understanding it right, he's asking what's the deadline for payment, and if he's allowed to transfer the order to somebody else's. |
|
|
|
furball: the latency is (from my experience) mostly determined by your maxblocksize. set it to 5000 (so you can catch a few transactions that might have bloated fees) and your latency should drop a lot. less transactions = lower latency. also less orphans
Thanks so much for the tip zvs, will definitely give that a go. ... and another p2pooler makes p2pool 100 times worse than using any of the top pools ... Just for the record: It's not another, it's always the same one.... |
|
|
|
Miners and nodes who have the updated anti-dust code won't relay or mine those transactions, regardless of what fee you put them AFAIK.
With their percentage of the hash power of the network, obviously ASICMINER can mine its own blocks, including its own transactions. They don't need them to be relayed by anybody... That said, and as I already said before, sending those outputs, even being feasible to ASICMINER, is a really bad idea because damages the overall health of the network. |
|
|
|
Putting Hashking on your dartboard I can understand. But what's wrong with Maggie?  There was a coal mine and a steelworks in the town I grew up in until the early 1980s. Now there is no work and lots of heroin addicts. Some of my people, here in Argentina, also could tell you some of what was wrong with her, but meh.... |
|
|
|
Can anyone answer why we don't solo mine?
I dont have read a reason for that either except of variance. The chance of finding a block is higher with a pool with more hashing power. Though i dont know why it should be so much better to pay a fee. I cant imagine that variance gives 3 or more percent that the poolfees takes away. Variance is one answer. Accountability to shareholders is another - it's easier for shareholders to estimate the earnings if the stats are on a public pool. ASICMINER could mine on a public p2pool instance... |
|
|
|
Bitparking is a nice MM pool supporting stratum. May be worth a try...
|
|
|
|
|
MOORE dividends are been paid periodically. They're just not posted in the thread.
BTW. If anybody wants to sell some, shoot me a PM.
|
|
|
|
I am unable to send my litecoins from my litecoin-qt wallet. I have posted in other forums with no response after days. I am currently using Litecoin-QT v0.6.3-beta. OS is Win7 Ultimate SP1 64bit. When I attempt to send coins the program gives me the following errors and closes itself.   I have uninstalled, removed all appdata, and re installed from scratch (re-downloaded block chain and reloaded my back up wallet .dat file) and still get the same issue. I have also uninstalled the v0.6.3-beta and replaced with v0.6.3c-beta and still receive the same error. I get the same error with using sendtoaddress in command line interface. error: {"code":-1,"message":"ReserveKeyFromKeyPool() : unknown key in key pool"} Getting frustrated searching forum after forum and google search after google search without finding anything about my issue. Does anyone have any insight on how I can fix this issue? Looks like your wallet got corrupted. Do you have any backup? |
|
|
|
Please make it easy to count the number of decimal spaces.
0.000035 and 0.0000035 seem too similar and mistakes can happen.
I would recommend adding commas after decimal points too.
0.000,035 and 0.000,003,5
Or at least, make sure that each number has 8 digits after the decimal point. Don't get rid of the zeroes.
0.00003500 instead of 0.000035
(This is done on the My Assets page. But its not done on the Bid and Ask tables of the actual stock page.)
Thanks for keeping on rocking.
Yup, it will be #.####,#### when its supported right all over the site. Or you can introduce a way to use the mBTC and μBTC notation on the site. That would do it, and it would be consistent with the satoshi client. |
|
|
|
I have not received a dividend payment this week. (Got last week's.)
Network luck is pitiful (7 blocks in ~3 hours) right now. LOTS of transactions not getting confirmed as a result, so your dividend may just be stuck in limbo at the moment. BTW. Is it really needed to confirm the number of shares with satoshi's? Using the blockchain for communications isn't a good idea. It spams the system, bloating everything. Just saying... |
|
|
|
|
Friedcat:
Could you setup some kind of "Announcement" locked thread, so we can be updated without all the noise and speculation on this thread?
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
rLUDMMu977W6s349AKW4JbB8RLpiv9CX9P
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, obviously you're free to break every upstream api, and to implement any specific thing that you like. But the implicit cost of any unneeded divergence with bitcoin is massive, breaking compatibility with third party software which has to be adapted specifically to your coin, and making it impossible or tremendously difficulty to merge any upstream change...
|
|
|
|
|
getmemorypool is removed upstream. It would be certainly better to implement getblocktemplate, if possible...
|
|
|
|
Care to post a summary of those emails? Inquiring minds wish to know.
why to summarize if they can be posted in full length? Yeah, it would be great if you can make everything public, as it always should have been. The secrecy with which everything has been always handled only builds over the overall scammy feeling of the whole matter... If this hasn't been a plain scam from day one (sadly, I have not proof whatsoever of it), at least it has been a huge scammy negligence. Whatever it is, this guys shouldn't be doing public businesses nevermore. Well, anyway, calling theirs thing business is a huge overstatement... And Paul deciding on a rush, almost alone, what to do, and deciding to keep the remaining hardware for himself is a scam on itself... |
|
|
|
I appeal to the liquidator of the company, the price of coins reached a high level, if the remaining coins to sell now - may be enough to Fiat that would cover all losses for claimants.  To sell at a time when the market is strong demand for the coin, and not after the correction. Believe me, I've been around for a long time watching this economic experiment, though A huge part of the debt is denominated in BTC. Most BTC holders won't be happy if somebody decides to sell theirs BTCs to pay some others theirs fiat... |
|
|
|
oh, a lot of things happened since i last checked.
server gone, miners off
... short notice vote without any prior discussion.
This alone is enough to declare the whole thing void. So I'm proposing to start a discussion to decide ourselves what to do. I'm proposing myself to take things in charge. I can run the miners from Argentina, where energy rates are really low. But I would support Mila too, if he wants to take the torch. two weeks later long post
month later vote from nowhere.
not cool
and no word from other 6 founding members
Long post saying basically nothing, by the way. Until this last post I didn't knew miners weren't working. So many breaches of fiduciary duty... Looks like some people are just playing games here... |
|
|
|
|
I'm not in the mood for arguing right now, but I just want to state clearly that I won't recognize anything as settled if Paul proceeds as stated.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
