Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 03:02:02 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Economy / Speculation / Re: Get ready for incoming crashes on: January 25, 2015, 09:09:43 PM
The crashes already over
Now bitcoin price already at $250

We will see more rise for a while Smiley
But bitcoin before the price rise up more guys

still far away from uit's glory price, another crash could be expected at a slightly higher price, than the current one
There will always be consistent downward pressure on bitcoin.  Big Miners have bills to pay and need to sell regardless of price.  They'll sit on what they can while they can afford to.

The current situation is a clear example of problems the bitcoin network will face in the future. Miners only continue to operate when it’s profitable. Bitcoin value will always be tied to operating costs of people, equipment, facilities & energy.
Not always, once big old money comes thanks to initiatives like the Gemini exchange by the Winklevii we'll see a bigger demand than offer which will translate in an uptrend.
Even under the shadow of Mt. Gox & Bitstamp, this will be scary huge.  Strap in, 2015 will be a wild ride if this ETF is approved. This could save the large Mining operations for awhile.  The just curious money alone will create a second bubble, remember to set your sell triggers.  Then buy back after the dust settles.

“But Mr. Luria sees Bitcoin’s wide price fluctuations as a risk for investors. Bitcoin isn’t the only commodity that trades 24 hours a day, but it does have wilder price shifts than many other assets.

“The price could decrease tremendously after the market closes, and you won’t be able to do anything about it,” Mr. Luria said.”

http://[Suspicious link removed]/vnu5HV
2  Economy / Speculation / Re: Get ready for incoming crashes on: January 25, 2015, 04:44:50 PM
The crashes already over
Now bitcoin price already at $250

We will see more rise for a while Smiley
But bitcoin before the price rise up more guys

still far away from uit's glory price, another crash could be expected at a slightly higher price, than the current one
There will always be consistent downward pressure on bitcoin.  Big Miners have bills to pay and need to sell regardless of price.  They'll sit on what they can while they can afford to.

The current situation is a clear example of problems the bitcoin network will face in the future. Miners only continue to operate when it’s profitable. Bitcoin value will always be tied to operating costs of people, equipment, facilities & energy.
3  Economy / Economics / Re: Is bitcoin too volatile? on: January 25, 2015, 04:34:26 PM
bitcoin is not volatile, and it's value is not volatile, only the price is volatile
I believe in the technology to a point, but for it to be a widely accepted currency it needs to be fairly stable.  Would you accept your paycheck only in BTC at this point?  Could you survive only using it to exchange for goods & services instead of your local fiat? 

4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 04:23:43 PM

Just because the price is going down? Many stocks go down then recover especially when they are stocks of a new high tech company. Bitcoin is still in business!
Bitcoin is supposed to be a currency not a stock.

It is not meant to be none, at least from the start:
Quote
As a thought experiment, imagine there was a base metal as scarce as gold but with the following properties:
- boring grey in colour
- not a good conductor of electricity
- not particularly strong, but not ductile or easily malleable either
- not useful for any practical or ornamental purpose

and one special, magical property:
- can be transported over a communications channel

If it somehow acquired any value at all for whatever reason, then anyone wanting to transfer wealth over a long distance could buy some, transmit it, and have the recipient sell it.

It might resemble a currency, but a currency is more than some stuff you can use to buy other stuff

Actually it's supposed to be an alternative currency.  And it's only purpose is to hold value to trade for or "buy other stuff"

“Bitcoin was a genius invention, but its implementation became corrupted by people whose aim was to make money – not bitcoins, but dollars.” ~ BCnext 
5  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Buying a bitcoin for $300? on: January 25, 2015, 01:48:28 PM
Hi, I bought a bitcoin from virwox for 200GBP = 300USD. Was this a good price? I could only buy it off virwox because on localbitcoins prices for one bitcoin were £172 and virwox was only £28 more and I don't have online banking? Did I buy at a good price or was it too high?
Sit on it for a few months.  It's speculation buy low, sell high:)
6  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 01:38:13 PM

79% of what?  The high bitcoin price $1,200 to $250 = 79% decrease

That's the price decrease, not company's loss.
Trent Russell already answered that but you ignored it.

I didn't declare them insolvent, I just don't trust any company offering a guaranteed BTC to $ return especially when you read the TOS.

No one asks you to trust them. Again, if you're concerned about their model you should ask them to clarify in the first place. Did you bother to do it?

I had a roommate from Panama that said that for enough $$$$ you could essentially do what ever you wanted as long as the right people were paid off.

That could be applied to any country, the definition of "enough $$$$" will vary tho.
Still, Panama being corrupted doesn't mean every business registered there is automatically a fraud.

Now back to my original problem with bitcoin volatility.   

To be widely accepted, bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain fairly stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 35% of it's value week to week.  Currently you still have to convert to fiat $ to pay bills.  Would your utility company, landlord or mortgage company deal with +/- 35% weekly value fluctuations?   Would you be able to pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(


Price averaging. Your kids will eat in " -35% week" if you saved a surplus from "+35% week".

Volatility is inevitable in the early stages. What do you suggest? Pegging it to USD?

Price averaging is not practical when you have no idea how high or low it can go.  As you can see by the 2014 charts, your guess is as good as anyone's.

The current situation is a clear example of problems the Bitcoin network will face in the future. Miners only continue to operate when it’s profitable. Bitcoin value will always be tied to operating costs of people, equipment, facilities & energy.

Will their be enough individuals running long term hashing power to support network transactions when mining is over?  What will their operating costs be? 

Will the system eventually transform into something centralized that will charge transaction fees to support operating costs?  Which would be very similar to the banking system that we have today but without Government backing.
7  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 01:19:06 PM

Do you really call "Coinapult" a solution?  Do you seriously think that they really could survive holding a 79% loss on the books for over 6 months & still be able to pay commitments?
To (hedge) a 79% loss you need an alternative income source to support it.  Located in Panama, I imagine they have so many other alternate income streams, really?
I wouldn't count on them fulfilling their commitments when the BTC price fluctuates wildly.


79% of what?


79% of what?  The high bitcoin price $1,200 to $250 = 79% decrease


I explained above why a loss (or gain) in bitcoin relative to the locked currency does not imply a loss on the books for the service. (It's not complicated.) For some reason you're still pretending that a 79% loss in the price of bitcoin relative to the USD implies the service provider has a 79% loss on the books. Now the question is: what is your motive in pretending that?

You’re right,

To my knowledge Coinapult is not currently carrying any loss on the books until they commit.  They are locking BTC to a current BTC=fiat trade value.

In their Actual Locking TOS:  “After your acceptance of the quote described above, subject to these Terms, your Fixed Bitcoins will be converted into the right to receive a future amount of variable bitcoins corresponding to the quoted underlying asset or currency value (the “Variable Bitcoins”).”

What will the value of the “Variable Bitcoins” be?

Considering the current wild fluctuations in BTC, it concerns me that any company offering this service is exposing themselves to a significant risk even in a 24hr period from offer to acceptance.

Taking into account the past few months of volatility. They have to maintain significant assets to cover the extreme recent BTC price fluctuations.
8  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 12:43:14 PM

Now back to my original problem with bitcoin volatility.   




I Love Bitcoin’s Volatility

http://nakamotoinstitute.org/mempool/i-love-bitcoins-volatility/
Bitcoin is supposed to be a currency not a stock.
9  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 12:34:37 PM

Do you really call "Coinapult" a solution?  Do you seriously think that they really could survive holding a 79% loss on the books for over 6 months & still be able to pay commitments?
To (hedge) a 79% loss you need an alternative income source to support it.  Located in Panama, I imagine they have so many other alternate income streams, really?
I wouldn't count on them fulfilling their commitments when the BTC price fluctuates wildly.


79% of what?

Anyhow, if you're concerned about their business model just ask them directly to explain it to you (before declaring them insolvent). IIRC they're active on this forum.

And they're not the only business that offers such service:

http://www.coindesk.com/first-glimpse-inside-halsey-minors-new-payments-platform-bitreserve/

https://bitreserve.org/en/homepage

https://bitreserve.org/en/status

BitReserve have offices in US and Shanghai, if Panama is not good for you.

ps I don't use neither Coinapult or Bitreserve, so I cannot vouch for any of them.

79% of what?  The high bitcoin price $1,200 to $250 = 79% decrease

I didn't declare them insolvent, I just don't trust any company offering a guaranteed BTC to $ return especially when you read the TOS.

I had a roommate from Panama that said that for enough $$$$ you could essentially do what ever you wanted as long as the right people were paid off.

Now back to my original problem with bitcoin volatility.   

To be widely accepted, bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain fairly stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 35% of it's value week to week.  Currently you still have to convert to fiat $ to pay bills.  Would your utility company, landlord or mortgage company deal with +/- 35% weekly value fluctuations?   Would you be able to pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

10  Economy / Economics / Re: Is bitcoin too volatile? on: January 25, 2015, 11:58:06 AM
WHen the US Colonies were first established each State had it's own currency, and exchange rates were likely a bit volatile. It wasn't until a single currency (the Dollar) emerged that things settled down. It's possible we're seeing the same with cryptocurrencies today...with the difference being that the strong contender to be the single cryptocurrency already exists, bitcoin.
It's not  the same tho. Dollar is under severe regulations, Bitcoin is true free market, so not sure if it can be as stable without extreme regulations.

Regulation is anathema to Bitcoin. Better to have a volatile, unregulated cryptocurrency than a stable, regulated one.
To be widely accepted bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 30% of it's value week to week.  Could you pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

A swizz employee living in france got his spending power increased by 30 % last week. A french empoloyee living in Schweiz got his spending power reduced. Only regulated currencies, no bitcoins involved. Regulators can not fix that, any more than daytraders. Probably, the market can do the regulation better. Stable value of money is an illusion, has always been.

Merhaba Erdogan, I lived in Turkey for 3 years and as economies go, you have a unfortunate base economic reference.  I appreciate that you have suffered through some of the worst economic times that most people can't even imagine.  In the US the landlord or mortgage company want their money on time and on value.  They aren't interested in spending power, they want $$$.

I don't live in Turkey, I just run it. Smiley

Do you live in Germany or Austria?

I could tell you, but I prefer to be maximally anonymous here, so I can express myself freely. Anyway, a friend of a friend is hired by a swiss company, but lives in france.


Understood, Barış seninle olsun
11  Economy / Economics / Re: Is bitcoin too volatile? on: January 25, 2015, 11:49:00 AM
WHen the US Colonies were first established each State had it's own currency, and exchange rates were likely a bit volatile. It wasn't until a single currency (the Dollar) emerged that things settled down. It's possible we're seeing the same with cryptocurrencies today...with the difference being that the strong contender to be the single cryptocurrency already exists, bitcoin.
It's not  the same tho. Dollar is under severe regulations, Bitcoin is true free market, so not sure if it can be as stable without extreme regulations.

Regulation is anathema to Bitcoin. Better to have a volatile, unregulated cryptocurrency than a stable, regulated one.
To be widely accepted bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 30% of it's value week to week.  Could you pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

A swizz employee living in france got his spending power increased by 30 % last week. A french empoloyee living in Schweiz got his spending power reduced. Only regulated currencies, no bitcoins involved. Regulators can not fix that, any more than daytraders. Probably, the market can do the regulation better. Stable value of money is an illusion, has always been.

Merhaba Erdogan, I lived in Turkey for 3 years and as economies go, you have a unfortunate base economic reference.  I appreciate that you have suffered through some of the worst economic times that most people can't even imagine.  In the US the landlord or mortgage company want their money on time and on value.  They aren't interested in spending power, they want $$$.

I don't live in Turkey, I just run it. Smiley

Do you live in Germany or Austria?
12  Economy / Economics / Re: Is bitcoin too volatile? on: January 25, 2015, 11:35:50 AM
WHen the US Colonies were first established each State had it's own currency, and exchange rates were likely a bit volatile. It wasn't until a single currency (the Dollar) emerged that things settled down. It's possible we're seeing the same with cryptocurrencies today...with the difference being that the strong contender to be the single cryptocurrency already exists, bitcoin.
It's not  the same tho. Dollar is under severe regulations, Bitcoin is true free market, so not sure if it can be as stable without extreme regulations.

Regulation is anathema to Bitcoin. Better to have a volatile, unregulated cryptocurrency than a stable, regulated one.
To be widely accepted bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 30% of it's value week to week.  Could you pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

A swizz employee living in france got his spending power increased by 30 % last week. A french empoloyee living in Schweiz got his spending power reduced. Only regulated currencies, no bitcoins involved. Regulators can not fix that, any more than daytraders. Probably, the market can do the regulation better. Stable value of money is an illusion, has always been.

Merhaba Erdogan, I lived in Turkey for 3 years and as economies go, you have a unfortunate base economic reference.  I remember when $1USD = 1,200,000 TL  I appreciate that you have suffered through some of the worst economic times that most people can't even imagine.  In the US the landlord or mortgage company want their money on time and on value.  They aren't interested in spending power, they want $$$.
13  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 10:48:59 AM
damn, i sold all BTC at 180 USD  Cry - now iam panic buying!
I sold a bunch at lows like that twice. I finally learned my lesson and became a permabull.

well, actually that was a joke and i bought alot  Grin

-----------

@mmsmears

btc will not be stable for a loooong time. but that is not a problem. there is already a service called "LOCKS" which basically locks the btc value. other services will add similar things and make btc stable.

Are you talking about the "Locks" service provided by Panama-based bitcoin wallet provider Coinapult?  

If so my BS meter is flashing RED.  They would have to have significant assets to cover the extreme recent BTC price fluctuations.  

There's a reason companies setup in Panama, the Fed's can't easily haul them in for fraud.  


that is what iam talking about. best solution so far. you can also use some financial products (hedge) for this kind of stuff.

do you have a better solution for that problem  Wink ?
Do you really call "Coinapult" a solution?  Do you seriously think that they really could survive holding a 79% loss on the books for over 6 months & still be able to pay commitments?
To (hedge) a 79% loss you need an alternative income source to support it.  Located in Panama, I imagine they have so many other alternate income streams, really?
I wouldn't count on them fulfilling their commitments when the BTC price fluctuates wildly.


Coinapult: TOS
Locking your Bitcoins
You may choose to “lock” a certain amount of bitcoins in accordance with these Terms (the “Fixed Bitcoins”). When you “lock” your bitcoins, you are converting your Fixed Bitcoins into the right to receive a future amount of bitcoins based upon a future offered rate. We do not offer exchange services, and you are only entitled to receive bitcoins from us as set forth in these Terms.

Locking Quote
Before “locking” your Fixed Bitcoins, you will obtain a quote of the locking value of the Fixed Bitcoins corresponding to the value assigned by our system to an underlying asset or currency. Coinapult will communicate a time window to accept the quote for locking your Fixed Bitcoins into Variable Bitcoins.

Actual Locking
After having received a locking value for a certain amount of Fixed Bitcoins, you may accept the quote. After your acceptance of the quote described above, subject to these Terms, your Fixed Bitcoins will be converted into the right to receive a future amount of variable bitcoins corresponding to the quoted underlying asset or currency value (the “Variable Bitcoins”). By accepting the quote, you are further authorizing Coinapult to display a Variable Bitcoin balance in your wallet corresponding to the underlying asset value of your Fixed Bitcoins at the time of the lock.



 

14  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 09:51:30 AM

Just because the price is going down? Many stocks go down then recover especially when they are stocks of a new high tech company. Bitcoin is still in business!
Bitcoin is supposed to be a currency not a stock.

Unless people actually use it, it will be seen as a stock Sad

It’s no wonder why mainstream people are scared of bitcoin.  There’s such a mix of speculators treating BTC like a commodity investment & purists that want mainstream adoption as an everyday currency.  “News flash” it can only do one function well, it’s either a growth investment or a currency.  To attract new major venture capital investment, bitcoin needs to be volatile and have room for rapid growth.  For mainstream people to adopt it as an everyday currency, it needs to be moderately stable.

To be widely accepted, bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain fairly stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 35% of it's value week to week.  Currently you still have to convert to fiat $ to pay bills.  Would your utility company, landlord or mortgage company deal with +/- 35% weekly value fluctuations?   Would you be able to pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

“Bitcoin was a genius invention, but its implementation became corrupted by people whose aim was to make money – not bitcoins, but dollars.” ~ BCnext
15  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 09:33:51 AM

Just because the price is going down? Many stocks go down then recover especially when they are stocks of a new high tech company. Bitcoin is still in business!
Bitcoin is supposed to be a currency not a stock.
16  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 08:56:48 AM
damn, i sold all BTC at 180 USD  Cry - now iam panic buying!
I sold a bunch at lows like that twice. I finally learned my lesson and became a permabull.

well, actually that was a joke and i bought alot  Grin

-----------

@mmsmears

btc will not be stable for a loooong time. but that is not a problem. there is already a service called "LOCKS" which basically locks the btc value. other services will add similar things and make btc stable.

Are you talking about the "Locks" service provided by Panama-based bitcoin wallet provider Coinapult?  

If so my BS meter is flashing RED.  They would have to have significant assets to cover the extreme recent BTC price fluctuations.  

There's a reason companies setup in Panama, the Fed's can't easily haul them in for fraud.  
17  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I'm fucking out. bitcoin will be over soon..confirmed. on: January 25, 2015, 08:37:37 AM
Idiots bail at the first sign of down trends... Would like to personally thank You for future profits.
God luvs idiots  Wink

It’s no wonder why mainstream people are scared of bitcoin.  There’s such a mix of speculators treating BTC like a commodity investment & purists that want mainstream adoption as an everyday currency.  “News flash” it can only do one function well, it’s either a growth investment or a currency.  To attract new major venture capital investment, bitcoin needs to be volatile and have room for rapid growth.  For mainstream people to adopt it as an everyday currency, it needs to be moderately stable.

To be widely accepted, bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain fairly stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 35% of it's value week to week.  Currently you still have to convert to fiat $ to pay bills.  Would your utility company, landlord or mortgage company deal with +/- 35% weekly value fluctuations?   Would you be able to pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(

“Bitcoin was a genius invention, but its implementation became corrupted by people whose aim was to make money – not bitcoins, but dollars.” ~ BCnext
18  Economy / Economics / Re: Is bitcoin too volatile? on: January 25, 2015, 06:16:10 AM
WHen the US Colonies were first established each State had it's own currency, and exchange rates were likely a bit volatile. It wasn't until a single currency (the Dollar) emerged that things settled down. It's possible we're seeing the same with cryptocurrencies today...with the difference being that the strong contender to be the single cryptocurrency already exists, bitcoin.
It's not  the same tho. Dollar is under severe regulations, Bitcoin is true free market, so not sure if it can be as stable without extreme regulations.

Regulation is anathema to Bitcoin. Better to have a volatile, unregulated cryptocurrency than a stable, regulated one.
To be widely accepted bitcoin needs to settle down. People want their currency value to remain stable, not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  Imagine if your paycheck was paid only in bitcoins and you would gain or loose 30% of it's value week to week.  Could you pay your rent, mortgage, car & health insurance or buy groceries? Sorry kids, we don't eat this week:(
19  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Turning off miners on: January 19, 2015, 09:52:16 PM
Solar is definitely the way to go if you can afford a $30,000 solar system.  

I’ve been looking into Proof of Stake altcoins like NXT.org.  Both systems have their issues but PoS doesn’t have the need for massive equipment and power requirements that Proof of Work altcoins need to function.  PoS makes more sense to me since people are invested in the currency, not the equipment & power needed to support it.

Yet ONLY pos, can lead to holding and not using it as an currency.

Like I said “Both systems have their issues”.  Many people wish that more were holding Bitcoins now to stabilize the value. People want their currency value to remain stable not fluctuate wildly like a commodity stock.  

The current situation is a clear example of problems the Bitcoin network will face in the future. Miners only continue to operate when it’s profitable. Bitcoin value will always be tied to operating costs of people, equipment, facilities & energy.

Will their be enough individuals running long term hashing power to support network transactions for free when mining is over?

Will the system eventually transform into something centralized that will charge transaction fees to support operating costs?  Which would be exactly like the banking system that we have today.
20  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Turning off miners on: January 19, 2015, 08:59:11 PM
20 kw per day is huge man.

Hope you will create a topic on that. I want to see this.  Grin

Go SOLAR ftw!

Solar is definitely the way to go if you can afford a $30,000 solar system. 

I’ve been looking into Proof of Stake altcoins like NXT.org.  Both systems have their issues but PoS doesn’t have the need for massive equipment and power requirements that Proof of Work altcoins need to function.  PoS makes more sense to me since people are invested in the currency, not the equipment & power needed to support it.
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!