|
I've been here since '13 and I have been seeing the same thing being repeated here. Let me tell you: GPUs will never become obsolete. hey will always find their place to mine coins where FPGAs and the ASICs can't reach.
|
|
|
|
Hello! Tell me please ico Papel coin scam? Thanks in advance!
a lot of newbies in the official thread saying just "good project" , "nice project". Not a good sign. |
|
|
|
Hi
If I connect a gpu to a cable pcie of a psu and the riser with a cable of a different psu, can it be a problem?
Apologies for my bad command of english.
Don't do that, unless your psu are hybrid support. read and educate yourself about it on google first. For starters, this seems highly unsafe to me. Edit: I had googled about powering your mobo with different gpus and powering your gpu with different, and you were advised to not. |
|
|
|
proof of stake is not safe. Poof of work is power hungry. Choose one.
seeing from which side? whether from the type/ series GPUs? if see from there, of course, have a different such as if see from the power consumption between NVIDIA and AMD cards. of course, NVIDIA doesn't have hungry power consumption but if see AMD such as R9 I agree has hungry power consumption. I was talking about overall though. Say bitcoin uses as much electricity as a country. If someone did study on the whole crypto market, it could be so much more. PoS has little power consumption compared to pow. |
|
|
|
I wish this worked out. This coin had as much potential to be a success as the NEM.  |
|
|
|
idk whats the problem. I sync until block 70k close the wallet. later the wallet starts syncing blocks from 175k blocks  I did try many times. it goes back 100k-something blocks |
|
|
|
|
Is the mobo new or used one? I have used old mobos and never had such a problem. Like the last poster said check your oc settings again. It's likely that they're not working or not setup.
|
|
|
|
|
proof of stake is not safe. Poof of work is power hungry. Choose one.
Proof of stake is considered unsafe because one person holding big amount of coins could fork the blockchain. Low difficulty if people are offline = forked blockchain. But proof of work also has 51% attack.
|
|
|
|
I think best airdrop for me was NEM. But I sold it when it was only $600.  |
|
|
|
|
what is a "quantum proof" network? it sounds cool but what is it really? in past, people have claimed new algos and hey were always scam.
|
|
|
|
|
what is hashrate like on a 1050 ti?
|
|
|
|
|
newbies with one liners swarming this thread is not surprising. This has been seen with a number of projects in the past. Will see if I will make it through to the end. Flagged for negative trust on my profile that is. Not sure how to fix that. Thanks for assuring that I won't be flagged at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
the market is bearish, but isn't that normal in crypto? I see so much crying in this thread.
|
|
|
|
|
do you have complete wordpress theme developer course?
|
|
|
|
This made my day.  Wouldn't it be easier to just write a few lines of text by yourself then to paraphrase somebody else? |
|
|
|
Just found this and it looks like a real gem. Attempting to acheive an equal and fair distribution is certainly no easy task on the Bitcointalk forums with so many people owning multiple accounts to take advantage of any airdrops that come up. NEM is without doubt the greatest airdrop that we have seen and I was fortunate enough to be in the right place at the right time when NEM was announced. Things did not turn out so lucky for me with NEM however in the end. The NEM registration process was very open and only required a post expressing interest for the first 4000 accounts I seem to remember. This process still took a while as there were not anywhere near as many people around back then. I think that beyond the first few pages of the thread, very small but increasing NXT donations were required. The open nature of the stake claiming of course led to a lot of people making multiple claims with different accounts. The earliest price I remember for NEM was that people were trading stakes for around 30 LTC in an OTC thread. When it first listed on Poloniex it was around 150 satoshi/NEM. This was about 2.5 BTC per stake. For anyone holding multiple stakes this was a massively easy sell and so the price began a downward grind all the way to 30 satoshi. Sadly for me I sold all my NEM at around 75 sats for a grand total of around 1.7 BTC.  NEM wasn't very long after the Communitycoin and Sharecoin projects which were fully distributed via Bitcointalk and it did seem at the time that NEM was going to follow the price trajectory of these coins which ended up worthless. My son was born around this time and I went into crypto hibernation and never really looked back on the NEM project after selling. This was a harsh lesson and I now always hold a bag of any coin, just in case! With the parallels Nevra will have with NEM in terms of the distribution, it makes a lot of sense to fork the NEM code base as a starting point. As well as the fact that the tech behind NEM actually turned out to be pretty awesome. It's quite interesting that NEM was originally going to fork NXT to make a more fairly distributed version of that coin. Maybe someone will fork Nevra in a few years to try and iron out anything that doesn't go quite right with the distribution method here.  If this project can manage to get these stakes in the hands of something close to 1000 unique individuals then it will be quite an achievement and something that I'd really like to be involved in. Maybe it will allow me to put my NEM demons to rest! Something like that also happened to me. I was part of the nem token distribution and you only had to send $5 to get a stake in the nem token. I kept up with the NEM token for quite sometime, until I was fed up of declining prices of the token and finally I sold it for 0.8btc or even less. Not realizing that was the only bottom NEM has ever reached. I was under a debt to somebody and I had to give up on those coins as I couldn't bring myself to take more debt in hopes of NEM token going bigger. (ShareX and communitycoin etc were dying in those days, due to the lack of general public interest). Now the dynamics of cryptocurrency markets are different and I have high hopes with XEV. I think this coin will stand out of the crowd if it can overcome the common problem of distribution. I believe even the NEM was victim of sock puppets. Don't you think? This was also the time when NEM stakeholders were sent fake emails pretending to be NEM developers. And I got phished out with it too. And was used to send emails to more stakeholders. Also the why I have a negative trust. |
|
|
|
|
this was great P&D coin. Pity that it had to die.
|
|
|
|
|
I was left a false negative. And I started threads about it on here. But to no avail. Maybe the moderators of this forums are too busy to look into it. I hope that is not a problem for being a stakeholder here.
I am willing to provide any necessary details to ensure this is a negative by mistake.
Regarding the XEV, I am interested in being part of it. I have worked on compiling different Cryptocurrency wallets for different coins. I go by the same name on Github.
|
|
|
|
still nothing it would be nice if he just removed the negative. my first account was hacked. There's loads of proof for that. |
|
|
|
How does one build qt 4.8 projects on qt 5?
I use the greaterThan(QT_MAJOR_VERSION, 4): QT += widgets and added -static but the compiled file throws runtime errors on opening or sometimes closing. Is there anything else to do?
I don't know about building a 4.8.x bitcoinQt on a Qt 5.x system? But when I build 4.8.x on a 4.8.x (Windows 8.1) system, I found I got similar errors if I didn't delete all the .obj & other files in the build directory. The make file isn't too bright about what needs to be compiled and what doesn't. Ron My build dir is already clean. I compiled a clean source. No luck so far. I think this runtime has to do with how qt is not statically linking libs. I pasted some dlls into the coins release folder but no dice. Looking at http://www.qtcentre.org/threads/27729-statically-link-Qt-libraries-%28not-build-static-library%29 I tried the suggestions there and I still ended up with a dynamically linked bitcoin-qt.exe or *coin-qt.exe If you look at message #1 in this forum it is not clear what Qt is created on one's system. I did read, but can't find the link now, that one needs to build a set of libraries for Qt that are dynamic for the use of Qt creator and Qt designer (if you use them) and a set that is static for building one's applications. I don't know if that is so, nor how one would keep the environment straight Ron I still haven't figured this one out. And I stopped hacking at it for now. Did you find anything helpful? I use this and it works fine greaterThan(QT_MAJOR_VERSION, 4) {
QT += widgets
DEFINES += QT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE=0
} if you have errors, post them here, so people can help you. I have that in my code. My qt version is 5.3. The app starts fine. When I open debug window and enter any word or whenever I close the wallet. it closes with generic "this application has requested the runtime to terminate in an unusual way" I noticed the final qt file size is only 9.few mb which is low if qt would statically link libs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
