Yes and bitcointalk is a private forum with censorship and strict rules. The are co-community driven maybe but a lot of censorship and too much control to certain members do happen here. The only difference is, the platform is free to use. The fact that your admins can delete a post makes censorship, biased opinions and one-sided view much applicable in case of a disagreement.

Don't want to go deep in the implementation part but just some UI reviews since you asked for it
1. The way bets are displayed looks vague and not attractive. Not-structured is the correct word I'd say.
2. Colour schemes are out of contrast. Use an online contrast selected to see which shade goes well with what.
3. The sliding/animation effects are too dull. The website needs a revamp man. Don't go about changing individual things, hire a UX guy and relaunch it.

True. There is so much potential for someone to just come up with an open source protocol like ICO-Bench which would be community driven and wouldn't be controlled by sock puppets like Ico-Bench admins.

That doesn't sound too comforting. The generated content can be modified/updated/deleted by the admins and won't be immutable. This is the problem blockchain should solve and not promote it. You either are a community-driven platform or you aren't, there is no in-between.

P.S :Change that react favicon you might have got with the CRA boilerplate.

Damn, you took it another level! And thanks for linking me the quote of the century
I need to get that tattoed on one of my private body parts. Now we patiently wait for someone to take this crap seriously and actually use your template to launch a project. Technically, finding the scam ICO's has become easier than ever!

Did you notice one thing common in every game related suggestion posted above? None of the games played in real life can be cheated are publicly verifiable without the digital systems. Life was better back then I guess.

Rules of the games have changed in terms of the house edge. Back then, there was literally no house edge. The losing bets were the only source of income for the provider.

I wonder if they will now bribe the author to remove that article from the medium. Don't be surprised if that article disappears within a week.

Maybe the entire team is a part of it and that's how they make money?

Of course mate! This generation takes anything seriously and dwells on these sources as their primary influence. They think their money is in the same hands just because a site has good ratings on another website.

That's really a nice description you have put up there. (Many start-ups don't bother giving basic details and their threads like this are not taken seriously). I can assure you will find the desired candidates here but they wouldn't be comfortable with sharing any personal details with you. The one who will send your resumes, linkedIn profiles would be the market hunters just looking to make a quick buck. Most of the talented developers, managers, I have seen respect anonymity and would like to work anonymously. I know you wouldn't want a candidate like that and that's why you should try looking for people in real life as well.

I'm really waiting for a good alternative to Blockchain's block explorer. I thought this one would hit the spot but no, it's very basic and doesn't really even have the basic features of what Blockchain has. The night mode is interesting and without the night mode, the website looks too dull. They should have least included real-time block logging or a view where debit/credit transactions are clear. For now, I don't really think have much to make a shift from blockchain's explorer.

Maybe he just wants to be anonymous for personal reasons. Why don't you jabs understand anonymity has nothing to do with criminal activities? One can just be anonymous because he doesn't believe in having his personal information over the internet? I don't see anything wrong with that.

Just find an exchange which isn't interested in knowing what do you look like in real life. It's hard to find them these days but I'm sure something's out there.

That's an intuitive conclusion here.

He did not? He isn't a god that he will be able to predict before time if the project's going to be a scam in the future. Fake team pictures and other lame stuff isn't the case here. Why you don't think that the bounty whores are equally responsible if they get scammed? Only an idiot will blindly participate in a bounty without doing a bit of research himself.

At this point, your stupid ass is making this post-off-topic. I would give you the article if I had given two flying fucks about your existence. You indeed are showing a typical behaviour of scammers who are cancer to this forum. Now, go fuck yourself and stop derailing the thread then it already is.

As much as I support your scam finding abilities and always take them seriously, this one seems a bit off. Why? -> There are tons of white-paper writing authors who usually write white-papers for these low-class ICOs. Is there a chance all these white-papers are written by the same author in the same format?

You don't. You violate the basic rules of moarlity which is using someone's lack of awareness to make yourself some money. That is my personal opinion and doesn't have to align with what others think.

Provide more information about your project including

 - Is the code open sourced or verifiable before installing in the local machines (it should be)
 - What will be the reward for the testers? They aren't going to test them with their own monies anyway.
 - Are there any rewards for bugs if found and reported in testing?
 - Your website link.

The requirement always comes when it's the time for sending out the payments. I'm not fond of supporting the bounty hunters but anyone in their right mindset would ask very first questions to the team their KYC requirements. The team can introduce any ridiculous rules if the project investment is a hit and they want maximum profits for themselves.

So? You don't even own a business, what does the company have hired you for? Conning people into giving them free monies? It's better you research more about the company you work for and see how they can be using you to lure users.

It's hard to figure out from the description what game are you referring to but I hope it's this : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_game

Even today especially in the third world countries street gambling games are quite common. I've played them myself and it's way better than online gambling in terms of probability fair and stuff. Like I recently saw a video where a rat is allowed to run randomly into a number of holes with bets on them. Now this can't be made rigged by teaching a rat to run only in the selective holes.

The day they truly adopt bitcoin is the day when the term banks will be taken out of financial dictionaries. Banks and Bitcoins two separate things, the adoption of each other just means destroying the underlying concepts and vision. Banks will adopt a centralised blockchain but not bitcoin.

That doesn't matter really. As long as his match with Gregor was concerned, it could have been a fixed match and Gregor lost for winning a huge sum of money! Things wouldn't be the same with Khabib because he isn't as money hungry as Gregor is.

Why do all the MMA fighters have to box some cocky chump in a ring? This works only in favour of one.